Literature DB >> 1994394

Assassins and zealots: variations in peer review. Special report.

S S Siegelman.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1991        PMID： 1994394     DOI： 10.1148/radiology.178.3.1994394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN： 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


× No keyword cloud information.
  9 in total

1.  Responsible authorship and peer review.

Authors:  James R Wilson
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 2.  Reviewing for clinical orthopaedics and related research.

Authors:  Richard A Brand
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Fraud and misconduct in science: the stem cell seduction: Implications for the peer-review process.

Authors:  M A G van der Heyden; T van de Ven; T Opthof
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 4.  Information for peer reviewers.

Authors:  P Huston
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-04-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Editorial peer reviewers' recommendations at a general medical journal: are they reliable and do editors care?

Authors:  Richard L Kravitz; Peter Franks; Mitchell D Feldman; Martha Gerrity; Cindy Byrne; William M Tierney
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A reliability-generalization study of journal peer reviews: a multilevel meta-analysis of inter-rater reliability and its determinants.

Authors:  Lutz Bornmann; Rüdiger Mutz; Hans-Dieter Daniel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Differences in citation frequency of clinical and basic science papers in cardiovascular research.

Authors:  Tobias Opthof
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Inter-rater agreement in the scoring of abstracts submitted to a primary care research conference.

Authors:  Alan A Montgomery; Anna Graham; Philip H Evans; Tom Fahey
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-03-26       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Reimagining peer review as an expert elicitation process.

Authors:  Alexandru Marcoci; Ans Vercammen; Martin Bush; Daniel G Hamilton; Anca Hanea; Victoria Hemming; Bonnie C Wintle; Mark Burgman; Fiona Fidler
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2022-04-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.