Literature DB >> 12092488

Responsible authorship and peer review.

James R Wilson1.   

Abstract

In this article the basic principles of responsible authorship and peer review are surveyed, with special emphasis on (a) guidelines for refereeing archival journal articles and proposals; and (b) how these guidelines should be taken into account at all stages of writing.

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12092488     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-002-0016-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  15 in total

Review 1.  Effects of editorial peer review: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tom Jefferson; Philip Alderson; Elizabeth Wager; Frank Davidoff
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-06-05       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Integrity of the research process.

Authors:  P H Abelson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-05-29       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Rules for Referees.

Authors:  B K Forscher
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-10-15       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Assassins and zealots: variations in peer review. Special report.

Authors:  S S Siegelman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Changes to manuscripts during the editorial process: characterizing the evolution of a clinical paper.

Authors:  G P Purcell; S L Donovan; F Davidoff
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-07-15       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Radioimmunoassay: a probe for the fine structure of biologic systems.

Authors:  R S Yalow
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-06-16       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-03-19       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  An intervention to improve the reliability of manuscript reviews for the Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

Authors:  J Strayhorn; J F McDermott; P Tanguay
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 18.112

9.  Coping with fraud: the Darsee Case.

Authors:  B J Culliton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-04-01       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Lessons from the Darsee affair.

Authors:  A S Relman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-06-09       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  1 in total

1.  Some opinions on the review process of research papers destined for publication.

Authors:  Ehsan Roohi; Omid Mahian
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 3.525

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.