Literature DB >> 19941876

Mechanisms of dealing with DNA damage in terminally differentiated cells.

P Fortini1, E Dogliotti.   

Abstract

To protect genomic integrity living cells that are continuously exposed to DNA-damaging insults are equipped with an efficient defence mechanism termed the DNA damage response. Its function is to eliminate DNA damage through DNA repair and to remove damaged cells by apoptosis. The DNA damage response has been investigated mainly in proliferating cells, in which the cell cycle machinery is integrated with the DNA damage signalling. The current knowledge of the mechanisms of DNA repair, DNA damage signalling and cell death of post-mitotic cells that have undergone irreversible cell cycle withdrawal will be reviewed. Evidence will be provided that the protection of the genome integrity in terminally differentiated cells is achieved by different strategies than in proliferating cells. Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19941876     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2009.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  28 in total

Review 1.  The role of RAD9 in tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Howard B Lieberman; Joshua D Bernstock; Constantinos G Broustas; Kevin M Hopkins; Corinne Leloup; Aiping Zhu
Journal:  J Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 6.216

2.  DNA damage response by single-strand breaks in terminally differentiated muscle cells and the control of muscle integrity.

Authors:  P Fortini; C Ferretti; B Pascucci; L Narciso; D Pajalunga; E M R Puggioni; R Castino; C Isidoro; M Crescenzi; E Dogliotti
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 15.828

3.  Age-related gene response of human corneal endothelium to oxidative stress and DNA damage.

Authors:  Nancy C Joyce; Deshea L Harris; Cheng C Zhu
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 4.  DNA damage and autophagy.

Authors:  Humberto Rodriguez-Rocha; Aracely Garcia-Garcia; Mihalis I Panayiotidis; Rodrigo Franco
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  Differential epithelium DNA damage response to ATM and DNA-PK pathway inhibition in human prostate tissue culture.

Authors:  Zhewei Zhang; Zhiming Yang; Sari Jäämaa; Hester Liu; Laxmi G Pellakuru; Tsuyoshi Iwata; Taija M af Hällström; Angelo M De Marzo; Marikki Laiho
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 6.  Autophagy and its function in radiosensitivity.

Authors:  Yan Yang; Yuehua Yang; Xi Yang; Hongcheng Zhu; Qing Guo; Xiaochen Chen; Hao Zhang; Hongyan Cheng; Xinchen Sun
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-05-07

Review 7.  Proliferative capacity of corneal endothelial cells.

Authors:  Nancy C Joyce
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 3.467

Review 8.  Maintenance of genomic integrity after DNA double strand breaks in the human prostate and seminal vesicle epithelium: the best and the worst.

Authors:  Sari Jäämaa; Marikki Laiho
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 6.603

9.  DNA Damage Response and DNA Repair in Skeletal Myocytes From a Mouse Model of Spinal Muscular Atrophy.

Authors:  Saniya Fayzullina; Lee J Martin
Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol       Date:  2016-07-24       Impact factor: 3.685

10.  DNA damage mediates changes in neuronal sensitivity induced by the inflammatory mediators, MCP-1 and LPS, and can be reversed by enhancing the DNA repair function of APE1.

Authors:  Jill C Fehrenbacher; Chunlu Guo; Mark R Kelley; Michael R Vasko
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 3.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.