Literature DB >> 27452406

DNA Damage Response and DNA Repair in Skeletal Myocytes From a Mouse Model of Spinal Muscular Atrophy.

Saniya Fayzullina1, Lee J Martin2.   

Abstract

We studied DNA damage response (DDR) and DNA repair capacities of skeletal muscle cells from a mouse model of infantile spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) caused by loss-of-function mutation of survival of motor neuron (Smn). Primary myocyte cultures derived from skeletal muscle satellite cells of neonatal control and mutant SMN mice had similar myotube length, myonuclei, satellite cell marker Pax7 and differentiated myotube marker myosin, and acetylcholine receptor clustering. DNA damage was induced in differentiated skeletal myotubes by γ-irradiation, etoposide, and methyl methanesulfonate (MMS). Unexposed control and SMA myotubes had stable genome integrity. After γ-irradiation and etoposide, myotubes repaired most DNA damage equally. Control and mutant myotubes exposed to MMS exhibited equivalent DNA damage without repair. Control and SMA myotube nuclei contained DDR proteins phospho-p53 and phospho-H2AX foci that, with DNA damage, dispersed and then re-formed similarly after recovery. We conclude that mouse primary satellite cell-derived myotubes effectively respond to and repair DNA strand-breaks, while DNA alkylation repair is underrepresented. Morphological differentiation, genome stability, genome sensor, and DNA strand-break repair potential are preserved in mouse SMA myocytes; thus, reduced SMN does not interfere with myocyte differentiation, genome integrity, and DNA repair, and faulty DNA repair is unlikely pathogenic in SMA.
© 2016 American Association of Neuropathologists, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA damage; DNA repair; Motor neuron disease; Satellite cell; Skeletal muscle; Spinal muscular atrophy; p53

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27452406      PMCID: PMC5015659          DOI: 10.1093/jnen/nlw064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol        ISSN: 0022-3069            Impact factor:   3.685


  81 in total

1.  DNA damage profiling in motor neurons: a single-cell analysis by comet assay.

Authors:  Lee J Martin; Zhiping Liu
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.996

2.  Strain differences in response to acute hypoxia: CD-1 versus C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Charles F Zwemer; Michael Y Song; Katari A Carello; Louis G D'Alecy
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2006-08-17

3.  Direct isolation of satellite cells for skeletal muscle regeneration.

Authors:  Didier Montarras; Jennifer Morgan; Charlotte Collins; Frédéric Relaix; Stéphane Zaffran; Ana Cumano; Terence Partridge; Margaret Buckingham
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Benign spinal muscular atrophy arising in childhood and adolescence.

Authors:  D Gardner-Medwin; P Hudgson; J N Walton
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  1967 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.181

5.  HSPB7 is the most potent polyQ aggregation suppressor within the HSPB family of molecular chaperones.

Authors:  Michel J Vos; Marianne P Zijlstra; Bart Kanon; Maria A W H van Waarde-Verhagen; Ewout R P Brunt; Hendrika M J Oosterveld-Hut; Serena Carra; Ody C M Sibon; Harm H Kampinga
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 6.150

6.  Microelectrophoretic study of radiation-induced DNA damages in individual mammalian cells.

Authors:  O Ostling; K J Johanson
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1984-08-30       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 7.  The DNA damage response and cancer therapy.

Authors:  Christopher J Lord; Alan Ashworth
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  GEMIN2 promotes accumulation of RAD51 at double-strand breaks in homologous recombination.

Authors:  Yoshimasa Takizawa; Yong Qing; Motoki Takaku; Takako Ishida; Yuichi Morozumi; Takashi Tsujita; Toshiaki Kogame; Kouji Hirota; Masayuki Takahashi; Takehiko Shibata; Hitoshi Kurumizaka; Shunichi Takeda
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Differentiation-induced radioresistance in muscle cells.

Authors:  Lucia Latella; Jiri Lukas; Cristiano Simone; Pier Lorenzo Puri; Jiri Bartek
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 10.  The comet assay for DNA damage and repair: principles, applications, and limitations.

Authors:  Andrew R Collins
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.860

View more
  6 in total

1.  DNA Damage Response and Repair, DNA Methylation, and Cell Death in Human Neurons and Experimental Animal Neurons Are Different.

Authors:  Lee J Martin; Qing Chang
Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 3.685

Review 2.  R-loop Mediated DNA Damage and Impaired DNA Repair in Spinal Muscular Atrophy.

Authors:  Juliana Cuartas; Laxman Gangwani
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 6.147

Review 3.  Spinal Muscular Atrophy Modeling and Treatment Advances by Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Studies.

Authors:  Raffaella Adami; Daniele Bottai
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 5.739

4.  Stretching magnitude-dependent inactivation of AKT by ROS led to enhanced p53 mitochondrial translocation and myoblast apoptosis.

Authors:  Jing Song; Yaqi Wang; Xiao Yuan; Qiuxia Ji; Cunhui Fan; Hongmei Zhao; Wenjing Hao; Dapeng Ren
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 4.138

5.  Rapid recruitment of p53 to DNA damage sites directs DNA repair choice and integrity.

Authors:  Yu-Hsiu Wang; Teresa L F Ho; Anushya Hariharan; Hui Chin Goh; Yao Liang Wong; Nicole S Verkaik; May Yin Lee; Wai Leong Tam; Dik C van Gent; Ashok R Venkitaraman; Michael P Sheetz; David P Lane
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Combined deficiency of Senataxin and DNA-PKcs causes DNA damage accumulation and neurodegeneration in spinal muscular atrophy.

Authors:  Annapoorna Kannan; Kanchan Bhatia; Dana Branzei; Laxman Gangwani
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 16.971

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.