Literature DB >> 19940737

Cobb angle progression in adolescent scoliosis begins at the intervertebral disc.

Ryan E Will1, Ian A Stokes, Xing Qiu, Matthew R Walker, James O Sanders.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Longitudinal radiographic study of patients with progressive idiopathic scoliosis.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative contributions of vertebral and disc wedging to the increase in Cobb angle during 3 phases of adolescent skeletal growth and maturation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Both disc wedging and vertebral body wedging are found in progressive scoliosis, but their relative contribution to curve progression over time is unknown. Which occurs first is important for understanding how scoliosis progresses and for developing methods to halt progression. Previous studies have not properly identified maturity, and provide conflicting results.
METHODS: Eighteen girls were followed through their adolescent growth spurt with serial spine and hand skeletal age radiographs. Each Cobb angle was divided into disc wedge angles and vertebral wedge angles. The corresponding hand radiographs provided a measure of maturity level, the Digital Skeletal Age (DSA). The disc versus bone contributions to the Cobb angle were then compared during 3 growth phases: before the growth spurt, during the growth spurt and after the growth spurt. Significance of relative changes was assessed with the Wilcoxon 2-sided mean rank test.
RESULTS: Before the growth spurt, there was no difference in relative contributions of the disc and the bone (3 degrees vs. 0 degrees, P = 0.38) to curve progression. During the growth spurt, the mean disc component progressed significantly more than that of the vertebrae (15 degrees vs. 0 degrees, P = 0.0002). This reversed following the growth spurt with the vertebral component progressing more than the disc (10 degrees vs. 0 degrees, P = 0.01).
CONCLUSION: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis initially increases through disc wedging during the rapid growth spurt with progressive vertebral wedging occurring later.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19940737      PMCID: PMC2784923          DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c11853

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  16 in total

1.  Rotational lordosis; the development of single curve.

Authors:  E W SOMERVILLE
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1952-08

2.  Intervertebral disc biomechanics in the pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Theodoros B Grivas; Elias Vasiliadis; Marinos Malakasis; Vasilios Mouzakis; Dimitrios Segos
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2006

3.  Maturity assessment and curve progression in girls with idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  James O Sanders; Richard H Browne; Sharon J McConnell; Susan A Margraf; Timothy E Cooney; David N Finegold
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Identifying sources of variability in scoliosis classification using a rule-based automated algorithm.

Authors:  Ian A F Stokes; David D Aronsson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Spinal growth.

Authors:  R A Dickson; P Deacon
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1987-11

6.  Disc and vertebral wedging in patients with progressive scoliosis.

Authors:  I A Stokes; D D Aronsson
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  2001-08

7.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis.

Authors:  L G Lenke; R R Betz; J Harms; K H Bridwell; D H Clements; T G Lowe; K Blanke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Relative anterior spinal overgrowth in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Results of disproportionate endochondral-membranous bone growth.

Authors:  X Guo; W W Chau; Y L Chan; J C Y Cheng
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-09

9.  Correlation between nucleus zone migration within scoliotic intervertebral discs and mechanical properties distribution within scoliotic vertebrae.

Authors:  D Périé; D Curnier; J Sales de Gauzy
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.546

10.  Computer-assisted algorithms improve reliability of King classification and Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis.

Authors:  Ian A F Stokes; David D Aronsson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  28 in total

1.  Spinal growth modulation using a novel intravertebral epiphyseal device in an immature porcine model.

Authors:  Mark Driscoll; Carl-Eric Aubin; Alain Moreau; Yaroslav Wakula; John F Sarwark; Stefan Parent
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-21       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Letter to the editor concerning: "a comprehensive review of thoracic deformity parameters in scoliosis" by Jonathan A. Harris, Oscar H. Mayer, Suken A. Shah, Robert M. Campbell Jr., Sriram Balasubramanian. Eur Spine J (2014) 23:2594-2602, DOI 10.1007/s00586-014-3580-8.

Authors:  Theodoros B Grivas
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Metabolic Effects of Angulation, Compression, and Reduced Mobility on Annulus Fibrosis in a Model of Altered Mechanical Environment in Scoliosis.

Authors:  Ian A F Stokes; Carole A McBride; David D Aronsson; Peter J Roughley
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2013-06-06

4.  Intervertebral disc changes with angulation, compression and reduced mobility simulating altered mechanical environment in scoliosis.

Authors:  Ian A F Stokes; Carole McBride; David D Aronsson; Peter J Roughley
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-06-26       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  The cartilage matrisome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Carol A Wise; Diane Sepich; Aki Ushiki; Anas M Khanshour; Yared H Kidane; Nadja Makki; Christina A Gurnett; Ryan S Gray; Jonathan J Rios; Nadav Ahituv; Lila Solnica-Krezel
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 13.567

Review 6.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis 3D vertebral morphology, progression and nomenclature: a current concepts review.

Authors:  Fraser R Labrom; Maree T Izatt; Andrew P Claus; J Paige Little
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-04-18       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Analysis of the cervical spine sagittal alignment in young idiopathic scoliosis: a morphological classification of 120 cases.

Authors:  Miao Yu; Clement Silvestre; Tanguy Mouton; Rami Rachkidi; Lin Zeng; Pierre Roussouly
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Small vertebral cross-sectional area and tall intervertebral disc in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Skorn Ponrartana; Carissa L Fisher; Patricia C Aggabao; Thomas A Chavez; Alexander M Broom; Tishya A L Wren; David L Skaggs; Vicente Gilsanz
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-05-16

9.  Predictors of spine deformity progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andriy Noshchenko; Lilian Hoffecker; Emily M Lindley; Evalina L Burger; Christopher Mj Cain; Vikas V Patel; Andrew P Bradford
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-08-18

10.  Defining the bone morphometry, micro-architecture and volumetric density profile in osteopenic vs non-osteopenic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Zhi-Wei Wang; Wayne Yuk-Wai Lee; Tsz-Ping Lam; Benjamin Hon-Kei Yip; Fiona Wai-Ping Yu; Wing-Sze Yu; Feng Zhu; Bobby Kin-Wah Ng; Yong Qiu; Jack Chun-Yiu Cheng
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.