Skorn Ponrartana1, Carissa L Fisher1, Patricia C Aggabao1, Thomas A Chavez2, Alexander M Broom3, Tishya A L Wren3, David L Skaggs3, Vicente Gilsanz4,5,6. 1. Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, MS #81, 4650 Sunset Blvd., Los Angeles, CA, 90027, USA. 2. Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 4. Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, MS #81, 4650 Sunset Blvd., Los Angeles, CA, 90027, USA. vgilsanz@chla.usc.edu. 5. Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. vgilsanz@chla.usc.edu. 6. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. vgilsanz@chla.usc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: When compared to boys, girls have smaller vertebral cross-sectional area, which conveys a greater spinal flexibility, and a higher prevalence of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that small vertebral cross-sectional area and tall intervertebral disc height are structural characteristics of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using multiplanar imaging techniques, measures of vertebral cross-sectional area, vertebral height and intervertebral disc height in the lumbar spine were obtained in 35 pairs of girls and 11 pairs of boys with and without adolescent idiopathic scoliosis of the thoracic spine matched for age, height and weight. RESULTS: Compared to adolescents without spinal deformity, girls and boys with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis had, on average, 9.8% (6.68 ± 0.81 vs. 7.40 ± 0.99 cm(2); P = 0.0007) and 13.9% (8.22 ± 0.84 vs. 9.55 ± 1.61 cm(2); P = 0.009) smaller vertebral cross-sectional dimensions, respectively. Additionally, patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis had significantly greater values for intervertebral disc heights (9.06 ± 0.85 vs. 7.31 ± 0.62 mm and 9.09 ± 0.87 vs. 7.61 ± 1.00 mm for girls and boys respectively; both P ≤ 0.011). Multiple regression analysis indicated that the presence of scoliosis was negatively associated with vertebral cross-sectional area and positively with intervertebral disc height, independent of sex, age and body mass index. CONCLUSION: We provide new evidence that girls and boys with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis have significantly smaller vertebral cross-sectional area and taller intervertebral disc heights - two major structural determinants that influence trunk flexibility. With appropriate validation, these findings may have implications for the identification of children at the highest risk for developing scoliosis.
BACKGROUND: When compared to boys, girls have smaller vertebral cross-sectional area, which conveys a greater spinal flexibility, and a higher prevalence of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that small vertebral cross-sectional area and tall intervertebral disc height are structural characteristics of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using multiplanar imaging techniques, measures of vertebral cross-sectional area, vertebral height and intervertebral disc height in the lumbar spine were obtained in 35 pairs of girls and 11 pairs of boys with and without adolescent idiopathic scoliosis of the thoracic spine matched for age, height and weight. RESULTS: Compared to adolescents without spinal deformity, girls and boys with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis had, on average, 9.8% (6.68 ± 0.81 vs. 7.40 ± 0.99 cm(2); P = 0.0007) and 13.9% (8.22 ± 0.84 vs. 9.55 ± 1.61 cm(2); P = 0.009) smaller vertebral cross-sectional dimensions, respectively. Additionally, patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis had significantly greater values for intervertebral disc heights (9.06 ± 0.85 vs. 7.31 ± 0.62 mm and 9.09 ± 0.87 vs. 7.61 ± 1.00 mm for girls and boys respectively; both P ≤ 0.011). Multiple regression analysis indicated that the presence of scoliosis was negatively associated with vertebral cross-sectional area and positively with intervertebral disc height, independent of sex, age and body mass index. CONCLUSION: We provide new evidence that girls and boys with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis have significantly smaller vertebral cross-sectional area and taller intervertebral disc heights - two major structural determinants that influence trunk flexibility. With appropriate validation, these findings may have implications for the identification of children at the highest risk for developing scoliosis.
Authors: V W Y Hung; L Qin; C S K Cheung; T P Lam; B K W Ng; Y K Tse; X Guo; K M Lee; J C Y Cheng Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: C Meyer; E Cammarata; T Haumont; D Deviterne; G C Gauchard; B Leheup; P Lascombes; Ph P Perrin Journal: Scand J Med Sci Sports Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 4.221
Authors: S D Cook; A F Harding; E L Morgan; R J Nicholson; K A Thomas; T S Whitecloud; E S Ratner Journal: J Pediatr Orthop Date: 1987 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.324
Authors: Kiumars Arfai; Pisit D Pitukcheewanont; Michael I Goran; C Jane Tavare; Linda Heller; Vicente Gilsanz Journal: Radiology Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Tishya A L Wren; Patricia C Aggabao; Ervin Poorghasamians; Thomas A Chavez; Skorn Ponrartana; Vicente Gilsanz Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-02-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kwong Hang Yeung; Gene Chi Wai Man; Min Deng; Tsz Ping Lam; Jack Chun Yiu Cheng; Ka Chi Chan; Winnie Chiu Wing Chu Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2022-07-10 Impact factor: 2.562