Literature DB >> 11481553

Disc and vertebral wedging in patients with progressive scoliosis.

I A Stokes1, D D Aronsson.   

Abstract

A retrospective longitudinal radiographic study of patients with progressive scoliosis was conducted to determine the relative amount of wedging between vertebrae and discs as a function of progression of the scoliosis curve, cause of the scoliosis, and anatomic curve region. Posteroanterior radiographs of 27 patients with idiopathic scoliosis and of 17 patients with scoliosis associated with cerebral palsy were studied. The amount of wedging of vertebrae and discs at the curve apex was measured by the Cobb method and expressed as a proportion of the curve's Cobb angle. On average, the relative amount of vertebral and disc wedging did not differ significantly between initial and follow-up radiographs made after progression of the scoliosis. In both groups of patients, the mean vertebral wedging was more than the disc wedging in the thoracic region; the converse was found in curves in the lumbar and thoracolumbar regions. The patients with scoliosis associated with cerebral palsy had curves that were longer and more commonly in the thoracolumbar and lumbar regions. The relative wedging did not change significantly with curve progression and did not appear to differ by diagnosis. In the management of scoliosis, including small curves, it should be recognized that both the vertebrae and discs have a wedging deformity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11481553     DOI: 10.1097/00002517-200108000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord        ISSN: 0895-0385


  24 in total

1.  Estimation of the centre of mass for the study of postural control in Idiopathic Scoliosis patients: a comparison of two techniques.

Authors:  Karl F Zabjek; Christine Coillard; Charles-H Rivard; François Prince
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of axial vertebral rotation.

Authors:  Tomaz Vrtovec; Franjo Pernus; Bostjan Likar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Spinal growth modulation using a novel intravertebral epiphyseal device in an immature porcine model.

Authors:  Mark Driscoll; Carl-Eric Aubin; Alain Moreau; Yaroslav Wakula; John F Sarwark; Stefan Parent
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-21       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Spine slenderness and wedging in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and in asymptomatic population: an observational retrospective study.

Authors:  Claudio Vergari; Mohammad Karam; Raphael Pietton; Raphael Vialle; Ismat Ghanem; Wafa Skalli; Ayman Assi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Creation of an ovine model of progressive structural lordo-scoliosis using a unilateral laminar tether.

Authors:  John G Burke; Enzo Vettorato; Gudrun Schöffmann; R Eddie Clutton; Tim S Drew; J N Alastair Gibson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Validation, reliability, and complications of a tethering scoliosis model in the rabbit.

Authors:  Patricia M Kallemeier; Glenn R Buttermann; Brian P Beaubien; Xinqian Chen; David J Polga; William D Lew; Kirkham B Wood
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-04       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Nonfusion treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis by growth modulation and remodeling.

Authors:  David D Aronsson; Ian A F Stokes
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.324

8.  Structural and micro-anatomical changes in vertebrae associated with idiopathic-type spinal curvature in the curveback guppy model.

Authors:  Kristen F Gorman; Gregory R Handrigan; Ge Jin; Rob Wallis; Felix Breden
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2010-06-07

9.  Cobb angle progression in adolescent scoliosis begins at the intervertebral disc.

Authors:  Ryan E Will; Ian A Stokes; Xing Qiu; Matthew R Walker; James O Sanders
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Biomechanical simulations of the spine deformation process in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis from different pathogenesis hypotheses.

Authors:  I Villemure; C E Aubin; J Dansereau; H Labelle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-01-17       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.