Literature DB >> 36153472

A high quality, industrial data set for binding affinity prediction: performance comparison in different early drug discovery scenarios.

Andreas Tosstorff1, Markus G Rudolph2, Jason C Cole3, Michael Reutlinger2, Christian Kramer2, Hervé Schaffhauser2, Agnès Nilly2, Alexander Flohr2, Bernd Kuhn2.   

Abstract

We release a new, high quality data set of 1162 PDE10A inhibitors with experimentally determined binding affinities together with 77 PDE10A X-ray co-crystal structures from a Roche legacy project. This data set is used to compare the performance of different 2D- and 3D-machine learning (ML) as well as empirical scoring functions for predicting binding affinities with high throughput. We simulate use cases that are relevant in the lead optimization phase of early drug discovery. ML methods perform well at interpolation, but poorly in extrapolation scenarios-which are most relevant to a real-world application. Moreover, we find that investing into the docking workflow for binding pose generation using multi-template docking is rewarded with an improved scoring performance. A combination of 2D-ML and 3D scoring using a modified piecewise linear potential shows best overall performance, combining information on the protein environment with learning from existing SAR data.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Docking; Drug design; Lead optimization; Machine learning

Year:  2022        PMID: 36153472     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-022-00478-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   4.179


  25 in total

1.  The PDBbind database: collection of binding affinities for protein-ligand complexes with known three-dimensional structures.

Authors:  Renxiao Wang; Xueliang Fang; Yipin Lu; Shaomeng Wang
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-06-03       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  Maximum unbiased validation (MUV) data sets for virtual screening based on PubChem bioactivity data.

Authors:  Sebastian G Rohrer; Knut Baumann
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.956

3.  Understanding Conformational Entropy in Small Molecules.

Authors:  Lucian Chan; Garrett M Morris; Geoffrey R Hutchison
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  Visualizing convolutional neural network protein-ligand scoring.

Authors:  Joshua Hochuli; Alec Helbling; Tamar Skaist; Matthew Ragoza; David Ryan Koes
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 2.518

5.  Free energy calculations by computer simulation.

Authors:  P A Bash; U C Singh; R Langridge; P A Kollman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-05-01       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Identification of Noncompetitive Protein-Ligand Interactions for Structural Optimization.

Authors:  Andreas Tosstorff; Jason C Cole; Robin Taylor; Seth F Harris; Bernd Kuhn
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Directory of useful decoys, enhanced (DUD-E): better ligands and decoys for better benchmarking.

Authors:  Michael M Mysinger; Michael Carchia; John J Irwin; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 7.446

8.  Rationalizing tight ligand binding through cooperative interaction networks.

Authors:  Bernd Kuhn; Julian E Fuchs; Michael Reutlinger; Martin Stahl; Neil R Taylor
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  BindingDB: a web-accessible database of experimentally determined protein-ligand binding affinities.

Authors:  Tiqing Liu; Yuhmei Lin; Xin Wen; Robert N Jorissen; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  General Purpose Structure-Based Drug Discovery Neural Network Score Functions with Human-Interpretable Pharmacophore Maps.

Authors:  Benjamin P Brown; Jeffrey Mendenhall; Alexander R Geanes; Jens Meiler
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 4.956

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.