Literature DB >> 19937788

Advantage of next-generation frequency-domain optical coherence tomography compared with conventional time-domain system in the assessment of coronary lesion.

Shigeho Takarada1, Toshio Imanishi, Yong Liu, Hideyuki Ikejima, Hiroto Tsujioka, Akio Kuroi, Kohei Ishibashi, Kenichi Komukai, Takashi Tanimoto, Yasushi Ino, Hironori Kitabata, Takashi Kubo, Nobuo Nakamura, Kumiko Hirata, Atsushi Tanaka, Masato Mizukoshi, Takashi Akasaka.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intracoronary optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a high-resolution imaging modality used for evaluation of coronary lesion morphology. However, current time-domain OCT (TD-OCT) have a number of limitations with regard to both procedural usage and safety in the clinical setting. The next-generation frequency-domain OCT (FD-OCT), which has a much faster frame rate and pullback speed than TD-OCT, is expected to overcome these limitations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and usability of next generation FD-OCT in the assessment of coronary lesions.
METHODS: A comparison study was performed between FD-OCT and TD-OCT from the aspect of usability (set-up time), qualitatively (rate of clear image segment), and safety (adverse event) in 14 ischemic heart disease patients with 20 previously implanted coronary stents.
RESULTS: The mean time of the OCT procedure in this study from setup to completion of image acquisition was 3.2 +/- 0.8 min for FD-OCT and 11.2 +/- 2.5 min for TD-OCT (P < 0.01). In qualitative image assessment, FD-OCT has the potential to yield a higher rate of clear image segments (CIS) than TD-OCT (99.4% vs. 80.8%, respectively; P < 0.01). In addition to these improved characteristics, there were no ischemic ECG changes or arrhythmia associated with FD-OCT.
CONCLUSIONS: The next-generation intracoronary FD-OCT has better performance in the clinical setting and the potential to overcome several limitations of conventional TD-OCT systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19937788     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.22273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  35 in total

1.  Depth resolved detection of lipid using spectroscopic optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Christine P Fleming; Jocelyn Eckert; Elkan F Halpern; Joseph A Gardecki; Guillermo J Tearney
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  An assessment of the quality of optical coherence tomography image acquisition.

Authors:  Elder Iarossi Zago; Abdul Jawwad Samdani; Gabriel Tensol Rodrigues Pereira; Armando Vergara-Martel; Mohamad Amer Alaiti; Luis Augusto Dallan; Patricia Ely Pizzato; Vladislav Zimin; Anas Fares; Hiram G Bezerra
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Cut-off value of mal-apposition volume and depth for resolution at early phase of acute incomplete stent apposition after CoCr-EES implantation.

Authors:  Yohei Uchimura; Tomonori Itoh; Hideto Oda; Yuya Taguchi; Wataru Sasaki; Kyosuke Kaneko; Tsubasa Sakamoto; Iwao Goto; Masafumi Sakuma; Masaru Ishida; Tatsuo Kikuchi; Daisuke Terashita; Hiromasa Otake; Yoshihiro Morino; Toshiro Shinke
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-06-29       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  In vivo comparison of lumen dimensions measured by time domain-, and frequency domain-optical coherence tomography, and intravascular ultrasound.

Authors:  Soo-Joong Kim; Hang Lee; Koji Kato; Taishi Yonetsu; Ik-Kyung Jang
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-01-06       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Frequency-domain optical coherence tomography assessment of human carotid atherosclerosis using saline flush for blood clearance without balloon occlusion.

Authors:  C A Given; G F Attizzani; M R Jones; C N Ramsey; W H Brooks; M A Costa; H G Bezerra
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 6.  Concise Review of Optical Coherence Tomography in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Min-I Su; Chun-Yen Chen; Hung-I Yeh; Kuang-Te Wang
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.672

7.  Choice of Intracoronary Imaging: When to use Intravascular Ultrasound or Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Sudheer Koganti; Tushar Kotecha; Roby D Rakhit
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2016-05

Review 8.  Intravascular optical imaging technology for investigating the coronary artery.

Authors:  Melissa J Suter; Seemantini K Nadkarni; Giora Weisz; Atsushi Tanaka; Farouc A Jaffer; Brett E Bouma; Guillermo J Tearney
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-09

9.  Very long-term follow-up of strut apposition and tissue coverage with Biolimus A9 stents analyzed by optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Rodolfo Staico; Marco A Costa; Daniel Chamié; Hiram Bezerra; Luciana V Armaganijan; Ricardo A Costa; José Ribamar Costa; Dimytri Siqueira; Marinella Centemero; Áurea Chaves; Luiz Fernando Tanajura; Alexandre Abizaid; Fausto Feres; J Eduardo M R Sousa; Amanda G M R Sousa
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-03-03       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Impact of thin-cap fibroatheroma on predicting deteriorated coronary flow during interventional procedures in acute as well as stable coronary syndromes: insights from optical coherence tomography analysis.

Authors:  Tadatsugu Gamou; Kenji Sakata; Takao Matsubara; Toshihiko Yasuda; Kenji Miwa; Masaru Inoue; Honin Kanaya; Tetsuo Konno; Kenshi Hayashi; Masaaki Kawashiri; Masakazu Yamagishi
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 2.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.