Literature DB >> 19937773

The development of stimulus-specific auditory responses requires song exposure in male but not female zebra finches.

Kristen K Maul1, Henning U Voss, Lucas C Parra, Delanthi Salgado-Commissariat, Douglas Ballon, Ofer Tchernichovski, Santosh A Helekar.   

Abstract

Juvenile male zebra finches develop their song by imitation. Females do not sing but are attracted to males' songs. With functional magnetic resonance imaging and event-related potentials we tested how early auditory experience shapes responses in the auditory forebrain of the adult bird. Adult male birds kept in isolation over the sensitive period for song learning showed no consistency in auditory responses to conspecific songs, calls, and syllables. Thirty seconds of song playback each day over development, which is sufficient to induce song imitation, was also sufficient to shape stimulus-specific responses. Strikingly, adult females kept in isolation over development showed responses similar to those of males that were exposed to songs. We suggest that early auditory experience with songs may be required to tune perception toward conspecific songs in males, whereas in females song selectivity develops even without prior exposure to song.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19937773      PMCID: PMC3724414          DOI: 10.1002/dneu.20751

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Neurobiol        ISSN: 1932-8451            Impact factor:   3.964


  34 in total

Review 1.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles.

Authors:  G Pfurtscheller; F H Lopes da Silva
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  The spatiotemporal dynamics of illusory contour processing: combined high-density electrical mapping, source analysis, and functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Micah M Murray; Glenn R Wylie; Beth A Higgins; Daniel C Javitt; Charles E Schroeder; John J Foxe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Selectivity for conspecific song in the zebra finch auditory forebrain.

Authors:  Julie A Grace; Noopur Amin; Nandini C Singh; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  CULTURALLY TRANSMITTED PATTERNS OF VOCAL BEHAVIOR IN SPARROWS.

Authors:  P MARLER; M TAMURA
Journal:  Science       Date:  1964-12-11       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation.

Authors:  K J Worsley; S Marrett; P Neelin; A C Vandal; K J Friston; A C Evans
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Fiber tracking in the cervical spine and inferior brain regions with reversed gradient diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  Henning U Voss; Richard Watts; Aziz M Uluğ; Doug Ballon
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-01-27       Impact factor: 2.546

7.  Localized brain activation specific to auditory memory in a female songbird.

Authors:  Nienke J Terpstra; Johan J Bolhuis; Katharina Riebel; Jorien M M van der Burg; Ardie M den Boer-Visser
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 3.215

8.  Some problems of occipital alpha block in man.

Authors:  D A Pollen; M C Trachtenberg
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1972-06-22       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Vocal imitation in zebra finches is inversely related to model abundance.

Authors:  O Tchernichovski; T Lints; P P Mitra; F Nottebohm
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Speech perception in infancy predicts language development in the second year of life: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Feng-Ming Tsao; Huei-Mei Liu; Patricia K Kuhl
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug
View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Quantification of developmental birdsong learning from the subsyllabic scale to cultural evolution.

Authors:  Dina Lipkind; Ofer Tchernichovski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Courtship song preferences in female zebra finches are shaped by developmental auditory experience.

Authors:  Yining Chen; Oliver Clark; Sarah C Woolley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Processing of communication sounds: contributions of learning, memory, and experience.

Authors:  Amy Poremba; James Bigelow; Breein Rossi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 4.  A behavioral framework to guide research on central auditory development and plasticity.

Authors:  Dan H Sanes; Sarah M N Woolley
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 5.  Early experience shapes vocal neural coding and perception in songbirds.

Authors:  Sarah M N Woolley
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.038

6.  Experience dependence of neural responses to different classes of male songs in the primary auditory forebrain of female songbirds.

Authors:  Mark E Hauber; Sarah M N Woolley; Phillip Cassey; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 7.  Investigation of musicality in birdsong.

Authors:  David Rothenberg; Tina C Roeske; Henning U Voss; Marc Naguib; Ofer Tchernichovski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  He hears, she hears: are there sex differences in auditory processing?

Authors:  Kathleen M Yoder; Mimi L Phan; Kai Lu; David S Vicario
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 3.964

Review 9.  It takes a seasoned bird to be a good listener: communication between the sexes.

Authors:  Eliot A Brenowitz; Luke Remage-Healey
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 6.627

10.  Altered auditory BOLD response to conspecific birdsong in zebra finches with stuttered syllables.

Authors:  Henning U Voss; Delanthi Salgado-Commissariat; Santosh A Helekar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.