Literature DB >> 19937330

[Telemedicine in pacemaker therapy and follow-up].

A Schuchert1.   

Abstract

Present-day remote systems for cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) provide, in contrast to previous solutions, a broad range of data about the patient and the implanted device ("remote control"). Telemedicine includes remote monitoring as well as remote follow-up: Remote monitoring is the continual interrogation of the device to detect patient- or device-related adverse events earlier than with standard follow-up visits. Remote follow-up aims to replace scheduled and unscheduled face-to-face follow-up visits due to the interrogation of the automatic pacemaker functions. Currently available remote systems, such as Home Monitoring, CareLink, Merlin.net, and Latitude, have in common that they interrogate the device, send these data to a server, and provide the data to the physician on a secured web site. Automatic wireless interrogation of the device is the preferred solution; however, the devices must have been equipped with a micro-antenna, which is usually restricted to more recent pacemaker models. Knowledge about remote control in pacemaker patients is limited, because most remote applications were evaluated in ICD and CRT patients. While the most frequently reported clinical event in pacemaker patients is atrial fibrillation, the impact in routine clinical follow-up still has to be evaluated in detail. Device-related adverse events are rare. Large, long-term, randomized trials are comparing remote and conventional approaches with the aim of demonstrating the benefits of telemedicine in this patient group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19937330     DOI: 10.1007/s00399-009-0058-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol        ISSN: 0938-7412


  19 in total

1.  Follow-up of CRT-ICD: implications for the use of remote follow-up systems. Data from the InSync ICD Italian Registry.

Authors:  Maurizio Lunati; Maurizio Gasparini; Massimo Santini; Maurizio Landolina; Giovanni B Perego; Carlo Pappone; Maurizio Marzegalli; Carlo Argiolas; Anant Murthy; Sergio Valsecchi
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.976

2.  Rationale and design of a prospective study of the efficacy of a remote monitoring system used in implantable cardioverter defibrillator follow-up: the Lumos-T Reduces Routine Office Device Follow-Up Study (TRUST) study.

Authors:  Niraj Varma
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  Automatic home monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

Authors:  Jens Cosedis Nielsen; Hans Kottkamp; Markus Zabel; Etienne Aliot; Ulrich Kreutzer; Alexander Bauer; Andreas Schuchert; Hans Neuser; Burghard Schumacher; Herwig Schmidinger; Günter Stix; Jacques Clémenty; Dejan Danilovic; Gerhard Hindricks
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 5.214

4.  Remote control of implanted devices through Home Monitoring technology improves detection and clinical management of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Renato Pietro Ricci; Loredana Morichelli; Massimo Santini
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2008-11-16       Impact factor: 5.214

5.  Early automatic remote detection of combined lead insulation defect and ICD damage.

Authors:  Petr Neuzil; Milos Taborsky; Frantisek Holy; Karsten Wallbrueck
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 5.214

6.  "Home monitoring" for early detection of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator failure: a single-center prospective observational study.

Authors:  Melanie Hauck; Alexander Bauer; Frederik Voss; Slawomir Weretka; Hugo A Katus; Ruediger Becker
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 5.460

7.  Trial design of the clinical evaluation of remote notification to reduce time to clinical decision: the Clinical evaluation Of remote NotificatioN to rEduCe Time to clinical decision (CONNECT) study.

Authors:  George Crossley; Andrew Boyle; Holly Vitense; Lou Sherfesee; R Hardwin Mead
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 4.749

8.  Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: a safe, time-saving, and cost-effective means for follow-up.

Authors:  M J Pekka Raatikainen; Paavo Uusimaa; Mireille M E van Ginneken; Jacques P G Janssen; Markku Linnaluoto
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 5.214

Review 9.  Remote monitoring and follow-up of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

Authors:  Haran Burri; David Senouf
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.214

10.  Optimized post-operative surveillance of permanent pacemakers by home monitoring: the OEDIPE trial.

Authors:  Franck Halimi; Jacques Clémenty; Patrick Attuel; Xavier Dessenne; Walid Amara
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 5.214

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.