Anouk van Berkel1, Dennis Vriens2, Eric P Visser3, Marcel J R Janssen3, Martin Gotthardt3, Ad R M M Hermus4, Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei2,5, Henri J L M Timmers4. 1. Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands anouk.vanberkel@radboudumc.nl. 2. Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; and. 4. Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 5. MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Abstract
Static single-time-frame 18F-FDG PET/CT is useful for the localization and functional characterization of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs). 18F-FDG uptake varies between PPGLs with different genotypes, and the highest SUVs are observed in cases of succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) mutations, possibly related to enhanced aerobic glycolysis in tumor cells. The exact determinants of 18F-FDG accumulation in PPGLs are unknown. We performed dynamic PET/CT scanning to assess whether in vivo 18F-FDG pharmacokinetics has added value over static PET to distinguish different genotypes. Methods: Dynamic 18F-FDG PET/CT was performed on 13 sporadic PPGLs and 13 PPGLs from 11 patients with mutations in SDH complex subunits B and D, von Hippel-Lindau (VHL), RET, and neurofibromin 1 (NF1). Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using a 2-tissue-compartment tracer kinetic model. The derived transfer rate-constants for transmembranous glucose flux (K 1 [in], k 2 [out]) and intracellular phosphorylation (k 3), along with the vascular blood fraction (Vb), were analyzed using nonlinear regression analysis. Glucose metabolic rate (MRglc) was calculated using Patlak linear regression analysis. The SUVmax of the lesions was determined on additional static PET/CT images. Results: Both MRglc and SUVmax were significantly higher for hereditary cluster 1 (SDHx, VHL) tumors than for hereditary cluster 2 (RET, NF1) and sporadic tumors (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively). Median k 3 was significantly higher for cluster 1 than for sporadic tumors (P < 0.01). Median Vb was significantly higher for cluster 1 than for cluster 2 tumors (P < 0.01). No statistically significant differences in K 1 and k 2 were found between the groups. Cutoffs for k 3 to distinguish between cluster 1 and other tumors were established at 0.015 min-1 (100% sensitivity, 15.8% specificity) and 0.636 min-1 (100% specificity, 85.7% sensitivity). MRglc significantly correlated with SUVmax (P = 0.001) and k 3 (P = 0.002). Conclusion: In vivo metabolic tumor profiling in patients with PPGL can be achieved by assessing 18F-FDG pharmacokinetics using dynamic PET/CT scanning. Cluster 1 PPGLs can be reliably identified by a high 18F-FDG phosphorylation rate.
Static single-time-frame 18F-FDG PET/CT is useful for the localization and functional characterization of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs). 18F-FDG uptake varies between PPGLs with different genotypes, and the highest SUVs are observed in cases of succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) mutations, possibly related to enhanced aerobic glycolysis in tumor cells. The exact determinants of 18F-FDG accumulation in PPGLs are unknown. We performed dynamic PET/CT scanning to assess whether in vivo 18F-FDG pharmacokinetics has added value over static PET to distinguish different genotypes. Methods: Dynamic 18F-FDG PET/CT was performed on 13 sporadic PPGLs and 13 PPGLs from 11 patients with mutations in SDH complex subunits B and D, von Hippel-Lindau (VHL), RET, and neurofibromin 1 (NF1). Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using a 2-tissue-compartment tracer kinetic model. The derived transfer rate-constants for transmembranous glucose flux (K 1 [in], k 2 [out]) and intracellular phosphorylation (k 3), along with the vascular blood fraction (Vb), were analyzed using nonlinear regression analysis. Glucose metabolic rate (MRglc) was calculated using Patlak linear regression analysis. The SUVmax of the lesions was determined on additional static PET/CT images. Results: Both MRglc and SUVmax were significantly higher for hereditary cluster 1 (SDHx, VHL) tumors than for hereditary cluster 2 (RET, NF1) and sporadic tumors (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively). Median k 3 was significantly higher for cluster 1 than for sporadic tumors (P < 0.01). Median Vb was significantly higher for cluster 1 than for cluster 2 tumors (P < 0.01). No statistically significant differences in K 1 and k 2 were found between the groups. Cutoffs for k 3 to distinguish between cluster 1 and other tumors were established at 0.015 min-1 (100% sensitivity, 15.8% specificity) and 0.636 min-1 (100% specificity, 85.7% sensitivity). MRglc significantly correlated with SUVmax (P = 0.001) and k 3 (P = 0.002). Conclusion: In vivo metabolic tumor profiling in patients with PPGL can be achieved by assessing 18F-FDG pharmacokinetics using dynamic PET/CT scanning. Cluster 1 PPGLs can be reliably identified by a high 18F-FDG phosphorylation rate.
Authors: Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Eric P Visser; Paul F M Krabbe; Bas A van Hoorn; Emile B Koenders; Antoon T Willemsen; Jan Pruim; Frans H M Corstens; Wim J G Oyen Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: G Eisenhofer; T-T Huynh; K Pacak; F M Brouwers; M M Walther; W M Linehan; P J Munson; M Mannelli; D S Goldstein; A G Elkahloun Journal: Endocr Relat Cancer Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 5.678
Authors: Henri J L M Timmers; Anna Kozupa; Graeme Eisenhofer; Margarita Raygada; Karen T Adams; Daniel Solis; Jacques W M Lenders; Karel Pacak Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2007-01-02 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Mary A Selak; Sean M Armour; Elaine D MacKenzie; Houda Boulahbel; David G Watson; Kyle D Mansfield; Yi Pan; M Celeste Simon; Craig B Thompson; Eyal Gottlieb Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Hartmut P H Neumann; Christian Pawlu; Mariola Peczkowska; Birke Bausch; Sarah R McWhinney; Mihaela Muresan; Mary Buchta; Gerlind Franke; Joachim Klisch; Thorsten A Bley; Stefan Hoegerle; Carsten C Boedeker; Giuseppe Opocher; Jörg Schipper; Andrzej Januszewicz; Charis Eng Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-08-25 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Wyanne A Noortman; Dennis Vriens; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Cornelis H Slump; Erik H Aarntzen; Anouk van Berkel; Henri J L M Timmers; Floris H P van Velden Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2022-08-24 Impact factor: 7.034