Literature DB >> 19936572

Echo time dependence of BOLD fMRI studies of the piriform cortex.

Rainer Kopietz1, Jessica Albrecht, Jennifer Linn, Olga Pollatos, Andrea Anzinger, Tim Wesemann, Gunther Fesl, Thomas Stephan, Hartmut Brückmann, Martin Wiesmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: In functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies, brain areas that are commonly associated with the processing of olfactory stimuli, i.e., piriform cortex and orbitofrontal cortex, are often obscured by susceptibility-induced signal loss. The authors hypothesized that using a short echo time (TE) should not only reduce susceptibility artifacts but also increase the overall signal-to-noise ratio and allow to retrieve a blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signal in regions normally affected by these artifacts.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two sequences with TEs of 60 and 32 ms were compared using a 1.5-T MRI scanner: in a standard motor paradigm, activations of the contralateral motor cortex were measured. In an olfactory stimulation paradigm, activations in piriform cortex were compared.
RESULTS: Reducing TE from 60 to 32 ms reduced the observed signal intensity changes in the motor paradigm by 51%. Concomitant to this, geometric distortions and signal dropout artifacts were decreased at orbitofrontal and temporomesial brain areas in both paradigms. Contrary to the authors' expectations, the signal intensity changes in the piriform cortex were also reduced by 48% in the olfactory paradigm. Moreover, piriform cortex activation was detected in less subjects at TE = 32 ms than at TE = 60 ms. Changes in cortical activation were significant in the right, but not in the left piriform cortex.
CONCLUSION: Although a shorter TE reduces signal dropouts due to susceptibility artifacts, this shorter TE is not sufficient to recover the BOLD signal from regions affected by susceptibility artifacts such as the piriform cortex. Thus, reducing the TE to the T2* of the investigated region is not an effective approach to improve the results of olfactory fMRI studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19936572     DOI: 10.1007/s00062-009-9010-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Klin Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0939-7116


  27 in total

1.  Neuroimaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: comparison of oxygenation-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  G Krüger; A Kastrup; G H Glover
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Modeling geometric deformations in EPI time series.

Authors:  J L Andersson; C Hutton; J Ashburner; R Turner; K Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Single-shot T2(*) measurement to establish optimum echo time for fMRI: studies of the visual, motor, and auditory cortices at 3.0 T.

Authors:  S Clare; S Francis; P G Morris; R Bowtell
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation.

Authors:  K K Kwong; J W Belliveau; D A Chesler; I E Goldberg; R M Weisskoff; B P Poncelet; D N Kennedy; B E Hoppel; M S Cohen; R Turner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Anatomic localization and quantitative analysis of gradient refocused echo-planar fMRI susceptibility artifacts.

Authors:  J G Ojemann; E Akbudak; A Z Snyder; R C McKinstry; M E Raichle; T E Conturo
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  The benefits of increasing spatial resolution as a means of reducing artifacts due to field inhomogeneities.

Authors:  I R Young; I J Cox; D J Bryant; G M Bydder
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1988 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.546

7.  Tesla gradient recalled echo characteristics of photic stimulation-induced signal changes in the human primary visual cortex.

Authors:  R S Menon; S Ogawa; D W Tank; K Uğurbil
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  S Ogawa; D W Tank; R Menon; J M Ellermann; S G Kim; H Merkle; K Ugurbil
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-07-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Cerebral chemosensory evoked potentials elicited by chemical stimulation of the human olfactory and respiratory nasal mucosa.

Authors:  G Kobal; C Hummel
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1988 Jul-Aug

10.  Spin-echo and gradient-echo EPI of human brain activation using BOLD contrast: a comparative study at 1.5 T.

Authors:  P A Bandettini; E C Wong; A Jesmanowicz; R S Hinks; J S Hyde
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.044

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.