Literature DB >> 19934335

Prognostic significance of growth kinetics in newly diagnosed glioblastomas revealed by combining serial imaging with a novel biomathematical model.

Christina H Wang1, Jason K Rockhill, Maciej Mrugala, Danielle L Peacock, Albert Lai, Katy Jusenius, Joanna M Wardlaw, Timothy Cloughesy, Alexander M Spence, Russ Rockne, Ellsworth C Alvord, Kristin R Swanson.   

Abstract

Glioblastomas are the most aggressive primary brain tumors, characterized by their rapid proliferation and diffuse infiltration of the brain tissue. Survival patterns in patients with glioblastoma have been associated with a number of clinicopathologic factors including age and neurologic status, yet a significant quantitative link to in vivo growth kinetics of each glioma has remained elusive. Exploiting a recently developed tool for quantifying glioma net proliferation and invasion rates in individual patients using routinely available magnetic resonance images (MRI), we propose to link these patient-specific kinetic rates of biological aggressiveness to prognostic significance. Using our biologically based mathematical model for glioma growth and invasion, examination of serial pretreatment MRIs of 32 glioblastoma patients allowed quantification of these rates for each patient's tumor. Survival analyses revealed that even when controlling for standard clinical parameters (e.g., age and Karnofsky performance status), these model-defined parameters quantifying biological aggressiveness (net proliferation and invasion rates) were significantly associated with prognosis. One hypothesis generated was that the ratio of the actual survival time after whatever therapies were used to the duration of survival predicted (by the model) without any therapy would provide a therapeutic response index (TRI) of the overall effectiveness of the therapies. The TRI may provide important information, not otherwise available, about the effectiveness of the treatments in individual patients. To our knowledge, this is the first report indicating that dynamic insight from routinely obtained pretreatment imaging may be quantitatively useful in characterizing the survival of individual patients with glioblastoma. Such a hybrid tool bridging mathematical modeling and clinical imaging may allow for stratifying patients for clinical studies relative to their pretreatment biological aggressiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19934335      PMCID: PMC3467150          DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  36 in total

1.  Pattern of self-organization in tumour systems: complex growth dynamics in a novel brain tumour spheroid model.

Authors:  T S Deisboeck; M E Berens; A R Kansal; S Torquato; A O Stemmer-Rachamimov; E A Chiocca
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.831

2.  Quantifying efficacy of chemotherapy of brain tumors with homogeneous and heterogeneous drug delivery.

Authors:  Kristin R Swanson; Ellsworth C Alvord; J D Murray
Journal:  Acta Biotheor       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.774

3.  Imaging proliferation in brain tumors with 18F-FLT PET: comparison with 18F-FDG.

Authors:  Wei Chen; Timothy Cloughesy; Nirav Kamdar; Nagichettiar Satyamurthy; Marvin Bergsneider; Linda Liau; Paul Mischel; Johannes Czernin; Michael E Phelps; Daniel H S Silverman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  A multivariate analysis of 416 patients with glioblastoma multiforme: prognosis, extent of resection, and survival.

Authors:  M Lacroix; D Abi-Said; D R Fourney; Z L Gokaslan; W Shi; F DeMonte; F F Lang; I E McCutcheon; S J Hassenbusch; E Holland; K Hess; C Michael; D Miller; R Sawaya
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Continuous growth of mean tumor diameter in a subset of grade II gliomas.

Authors:  Emmanuel Mandonnet; Jean-Yves Delattre; Marie-Laure Tanguy; Kristin R Swanson; Antoine F Carpentier; Hugues Duffau; Philippe Cornu; Rémy Van Effenterre; Ellsworth C Alvord; Laurent Capelle
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 10.422

6.  Analysis of proliferation and apoptosis in brain gliomas: prognostic and clinical value.

Authors:  M A Heesters; J Koudstaal; K G Go; W M Molenaar
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  A quantitative model for differential motility of gliomas in grey and white matter.

Authors:  K R Swanson; E C Alvord; J D Murray
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.831

8.  Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma.

Authors:  Roger Stupp; Warren P Mason; Martin J van den Bent; Michael Weller; Barbara Fisher; Martin J B Taphoorn; Karl Belanger; Alba A Brandes; Christine Marosi; Ulrich Bogdahn; Jürgen Curschmann; Robert C Janzer; Samuel K Ludwin; Thierry Gorlia; Anouk Allgeier; Denis Lacombe; J Gregory Cairncross; Elizabeth Eisenhauer; René O Mirimanoff
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-03-10       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Factors influencing survival in high-grade gliomas.

Authors:  Jan C Buckner
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 10.  Positron emission tomography imaging of brain tumors.

Authors:  Alexander M Spence; David A Mankoff; Mark Muzi
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.264

View more
  77 in total

Review 1.  Delayed initiation of radiotherapy for glioblastoma: how important is it to push to the front (or the back) of the line?

Authors:  Yaacov Richard Lawrence; Deborah T Blumenthal; Diana Matceyevsky; Andrew A Kanner; Felix Bokstein; Benjamin W Corn
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-04-24       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Glial progenitor cell recruitment drives aggressive glioma growth: mathematical and experimental modelling.

Authors:  Susan Christine Massey; Marcela C Assanah; Kim A Lopez; Peter Canoll; Kristin R Swanson
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 3.  Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of glioblastoma multiforme: implications for understanding glioma ontogeny.

Authors:  Leif-Erik Bohman; Kristin R Swanson; Julia L Moore; Russ Rockne; Christopher Mandigo; Todd Hankinson; Marcela Assanah; Peter Canoll; Jeffrey N Bruce
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 4.  Mechanism-Based Modeling of Tumor Growth and Treatment Response Constrained by Multiparametric Imaging Data.

Authors:  David A Hormuth; Angela M Jarrett; Ernesto A B F Lima; Matthew T McKenna; David T Fuentes; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2019-02

5.  Clinically relevant modeling of tumor growth and treatment response.

Authors:  Thomas E Yankeelov; Nkiruka Atuegwu; David Hormuth; Jared A Weis; Stephanie L Barnes; Michael I Miga; Erin C Rericha; Vito Quaranta
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 6.  Clinical implications of in silico mathematical modeling for glioblastoma: a critical review.

Authors:  Maria Protopapa; Anna Zygogianni; Georgios S Stamatakos; Christos Antypas; Christina Armpilia; Nikolaos K Uzunoglu; Vassilis Kouloulias
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Quantifying the role of angiogenesis in malignant progression of gliomas: in silico modeling integrates imaging and histology.

Authors:  Kristin R Swanson; Russell C Rockne; Jonathan Claridge; Mark A Chaplain; Ellsworth C Alvord; Alexander R A Anderson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Applying a patient-specific bio-mathematical model of glioma growth to develop virtual [18F]-FMISO-PET images.

Authors:  Stanley Gu; Gargi Chakraborty; Kyle Champley; Adam M Alessio; Jonathan Claridge; Russell Rockne; Mark Muzi; Kenneth A Krohn; Alexander M Spence; Ellsworth C Alvord; Alexander R A Anderson; Paul E Kinahan; Kristin R Swanson
Journal:  Math Med Biol       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 1.854

9.  Modeling the growth dynamics of glioblastoma using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Chaitra Badve; Andrew E Sloan
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-07-12       Impact factor: 12.300

10.  Choline-to-N-acetyl aspartate and lipids-lactate-to-creatine ratios together with age assemble a significant Cox's proportional-hazards regression model for prediction of survival in high-grade gliomas.

Authors:  Ernesto Roldan-Valadez; Camilo Rios; Daniel Motola-Kuba; Juan Matus-Santos; Antonio R Villa; Sergio Moreno-Jimenez
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.