Literature DB >> 19934305

Pro-prostate-specific antigen measurements in serum and tissue are associated with treatment necessity among men enrolled in expectant management for prostate cancer.

Danil V Makarov1, Sumit Isharwal, Lori J Sokoll, Patricia Landis, Cameron Marlow, Jonathan I Epstein, Alan W Partin, H Ballentine Carter, Robert W Veltri.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We assessed the association of quantitative clinical and pathologic information, including serum and tissue pro-prostate-specific antigen (proPSA) measurements, with outcomes among men with prostate cancer in an expectant management (active surveillance) program. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: We identified 71 men enrolled in expectant management with frozen serum and tissue available from diagnosis: 39 subsequently developed unfavorable biopsies (Gleason score > or =7, > or =3 cores positive for cancer, >50% of any core involved with cancer), whereas 32 maintained favorable biopsies (median follow-up, 3.93 years). Serum total PSA, free PSA (fPSA), and [-2]proPSA were measured by the Beckman Coulter immunoassay. [-5/-7]proPSA was evaluated in cancer and benign-adjacent areas (BAA) by quantitative immunohistochemistry. Cox proportional hazards and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to identify significant associations with unfavorable biopsy conversion.
RESULTS: The ratio [-2]proPSA/% fPSA in serum was significantly higher at diagnosis (0.87 +/- 0.44 versus 0.65 +/- 0.36 pg/mL; P = 0.02) in men developing unfavorable biopsies. [-5/-7]proPSA tissue staining was more intense (4104.09 +/- 3033.50 versus 2418.06 +/- 1606.04; P = 0.03) and comprised a greater fractional area (11.58 +/- 7.08% versus 6.88 +/- 5.20%; P = 0.01) in BAA of these men. Serum [-2]proPSA/% fPSA [hazard ratio, 2.53 (1.18-5.41); P = 0.02], BAA [-5/-7]proPSA % area [hazard ratio, 1.06 (1.01-1.12); P = 0.02] and BAA [-5/-7]proPSA stain intensity [hazard ratio, 1.000213 (1.000071-1.000354); P = 0.003] were significantly associated with unfavorable biopsy in Kaplan-Meier and Cox analyses. Serum [-2]proPSA/% fPSA significantly correlated with BAA [-5/-7]proPSA % area (rho = 0.40; P = 0.002) and BAA [-5/-7]proPSA stain intensity (rho = 0.33; P = 0.016).
CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective cohort of men enrolled into expectant management for prostate cancer, serum and tissue levels of proPSA at diagnosis are associated with need for subsequent treatment. The increase in serum proPSA/% fPSA might be driven by increased proPSA production from "premalignant" cells in the prostate BAA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19934305      PMCID: PMC2787812          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  28 in total

1.  PSA doubling time predicts the outcome after active surveillance in screening-detected prostate cancer: results from the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer, Sweden section.

Authors:  Ali Khatami; Khatami Ali; Gunnar Aus; Aus Gunnar; Jan-Erik Damber; Damber Jan-Erik; Hans Lilja; Lilja Hans; Pär Lodding; Lodding Pär; Jonas Hugosson; Hugosson Jonas
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion associated with lethal prostate cancer in a watchful waiting cohort.

Authors:  F Demichelis; K Fall; S Perner; O Andrén; F Schmidt; S R Setlur; Y Hoshida; J-M Mosquera; Y Pawitan; C Lee; H-O Adami; L A Mucci; P W Kantoff; S-O Andersson; A M Chinnaiyan; J-E Johansson; M A Rubin
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 9.867

3.  Cancer statistics, 2008.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Elizabeth Ward; Yongping Hao; Jiaquan Xu; Taylor Murray; Michael J Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in localized prostate cancer: the Scandinavian prostate cancer group-4 randomized trial.

Authors:  Anna Bill-Axelson; Lars Holmberg; Frej Filén; Mirja Ruutu; Hans Garmo; Christer Busch; Stig Nordling; Michael Häggman; Swen-Olof Andersson; Stefan Bratell; Anders Spångberg; Juni Palmgren; Hans-Olov Adami; Jan-Erik Johansson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Biopsy tissue microarray study of Ki-67 expression in untreated, localized prostate cancer managed by active surveillance.

Authors:  S Jhavar; J Bartlett; G Kovacs; C Corbishley; D Dearnaley; R Eeles; V Khoo; R Huddart; A Horwich; A Thompson; A Norman; D Brewer; C S Cooper; C Parker
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 5.554

6.  A study of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in men with untreated localised prostate cancer on active surveillance.

Authors:  Nicholas J van As; Nandita M de Souza; Sophie F Riches; Veronica A Morgan; Sayid A Sohaib; David P Dearnaley; Chris C Parker
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Gene expression in fixed tissues and outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Yujin Hoshida; Augusto Villanueva; Masahiro Kobayashi; Judit Peix; Derek Y Chiang; Amy Camargo; Supriya Gupta; Jamie Moore; Matthew J Wrobel; Jim Lerner; Michael Reich; Jennifer A Chan; Jonathan N Glickman; Kenji Ikeda; Masaji Hashimoto; Goro Watanabe; Maria G Daidone; Sasan Roayaie; Myron Schwartz; Swan Thung; Helga B Salvesen; Stacey Gabriel; Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Jordi Bruix; Scott L Friedman; Hiromitsu Kumada; Josep M Llovet; Todd R Golub
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  A [-2]proPSA-based artificial neural network significantly improves differentiation between prostate cancer and benign prostatic diseases.

Authors:  Carsten Stephan; Anna-Maria Kahrs; Henning Cammann; Michael Lein; Mark Schrader; Serdar Deger; Kurt Miller; Klaus Jung
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 4.104

9.  [-2]proenzyme prostate specific antigen for prostate cancer detection: a national cancer institute early detection research network validation study.

Authors:  Lori J Sokoll; Yinghui Wang; Ziding Feng; Jacob Kagan; Alan W Partin; Martin G Sanda; Ian M Thompson; Daniel W Chan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Using nuclear morphometry to predict the need for treatment among men with low grade, low stage prostate cancer enrolled in a program of expectant management with curative intent.

Authors:  Danil V Makarov; Cameron Marlow; Jonathan I Epstein; M Craig Miller; Patricia Landis; Alan W Partin; H Ballentine Carter; Robert W Veltri
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 4.104

View more
  20 in total

1.  A pilot study evaluating serum pro-prostate-specific antigen in patients with rising PSA following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Antonino Sottile; Cinzia Ortega; Alfredo Berruti; Monica Mangioni; Sara Saponaro; Alessandra Polo; Veronica Prati; Giovanni Muto; Massimo Aglietta; Filippo Montemurro
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 2.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of clinicopathologic variables and biomarkers for risk stratification.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Sophie M Bruinsma; Joseph Nicholson; Alberto Briganti; Tom Pickles; Yoshiyuki Kakehi; Sigrid V Carlsson; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  A prospective, multicenter, National Cancer Institute Early Detection Research Network study of [-2]proPSA: improving prostate cancer detection and correlating with cancer aggressiveness.

Authors:  Lori J Sokoll; Martin G Sanda; Ziding Feng; Jacob Kagan; Isaac A Mizrahi; Dennis L Broyles; Alan W Partin; Sudhir Srivastava; Ian M Thompson; John T Wei; Zhen Zhang; Daniel W Chan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Longitudinal changes of benign prostate-specific antigen and [-2]proprostate-specific antigen in seven years in a community-based sample of men.

Authors:  Thomas Rhodes; Debra J Jacobson; Michaela E McGree; Jennifer L St Sauver; Cynthia J Girman; Michael M Lieber; George G Klee; Kitaw Demissie; Steven J Jacobsen
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 5.  Differentiation of lethal and non lethal prostate cancer: PSA and PSA isoforms and kinetics.

Authors:  H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 6.  Tumor markers in prostate cancer I: blood-based markers.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Axel Semjonow; Hans Lilja; Caroline Savage; Andrew J Vickers; Anders Bjartell
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.089

7.  A multicenter study of [-2]pro-prostate specific antigen combined with prostate specific antigen and free prostate specific antigen for prostate cancer detection in the 2.0 to 10.0 ng/ml prostate specific antigen range.

Authors:  William J Catalona; Alan W Partin; Martin G Sanda; John T Wei; George G Klee; Chris H Bangma; Kevin M Slawin; Leonard S Marks; Stacy Loeb; Dennis L Broyles; Sanghyuk S Shin; Amabelle B Cruz; Daniel W Chan; Lori J Sokoll; William L Roberts; Ron H N van Schaik; Isaac A Mizrahi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  ProPSA and diagnostic biopsy tissue DNA content combination improves accuracy to predict need for prostate cancer treatment among men enrolled in an active surveillance program.

Authors:  Sumit Isharwal; Danil V Makarov; Lori J Sokoll; Patricia Landis; Cameron Marlow; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin; H Ballentine Carter; Robert W Veltri
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Association of [-2]proPSA with biopsy reclassification during active surveillance for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; Stacy Loeb; Zhaoyong Feng; Sumit Isharwal; Patricia Landis; Debra J Elliot; Robert Veltri; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin; H Ballentine Carter; Bruce Trock; Lori J Sokoll
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Emerging PSA-based tests to improve screening.

Authors:  Richard J Bryant; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 2.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.