Literature DB >> 17013897

PSA doubling time predicts the outcome after active surveillance in screening-detected prostate cancer: results from the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer, Sweden section.

Ali Khatami1, Khatami Ali, Gunnar Aus, Aus Gunnar, Jan-Erik Damber, Damber Jan-Erik, Hans Lilja, Lilja Hans, Pär Lodding, Lodding Pär, Jonas Hugosson, Hugosson Jonas.   

Abstract

This study reports the outcome of active surveillance in men with PSA screening-detected prostate cancer (PC), and PSA doubling time (PSADT) was evaluated as a predictor of selecting patients to active treatment or surveillance. On December 31, 1994, 10,000 men were randomized to biennial PSA testing. Through to December 2004, a total of 660 men were diagnosed with PC, of whom 270 managed with initial surveillance. Of these 270 patients, 104 (39%) received active treatment during follow-up, 70 radical prostatectomy, 24 radiation and 10 endocrine treatment. Those who received active treatment during follow-up (mean 63 months) were significantly younger (62.6 vs. 65.5 years, p < 0.0001) and had a shorter PSADT (3.7 vs. 12 years, p < 0.0001). PSA relapse was observed in 9 of 70 patients who received RRP during a mean follow-up of 37 months. Seven of these nine PSA relapses were in the patients with preoperative PSADT < 2 years. None of the 37 operated patients with a PSADT > 4 years had a PSA relapse. In a Cox regression analysis adjusted for PSA, ratio-free PSA and amount of cancer in biopsy, only the preoperative PSADT was statistically significant predictor of PSA relapse in p = 0.031. The optimal candidate for surveillance is a man with early, low-grade, low-stage PC and a PSADT > 4 years. In younger men with a PSADT of less than 4 years, surveillance does not seem to be a justified alternative, and patient should be informed about the risk with such an approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17013897     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.22161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  37 in total

1.  Increasing low risk prostate cancer incidence in United States Air Force servicemen and selection of treatments.

Authors:  Deborah J del Junco; Erin E Fox; Sharon Cooper; Marc Goldhagen; Erik Koda; David Rogers; Edith Canby-Hagino; Jeri Kim; Curtis Pettaway; Douglas D Boyd
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Prostate cancer screening: Canadian guidelines 2011.

Authors:  Jonathan I Izawa; Laurence Klotz; D Robert Siemens; Wassim Kassouf; Alan So; John Jordan; Michael Chetner; Alla E Iansavichene
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of clinicopathologic variables and biomarkers for risk stratification.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Sophie M Bruinsma; Joseph Nicholson; Alberto Briganti; Tom Pickles; Yoshiyuki Kakehi; Sigrid V Carlsson; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 4.  Treatment of localized prostate cancer: when is active surveillance appropriate?

Authors:  Peter C Albertsen
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 5.  Active surveillance for favorable-risk prostate cancer: background, patient selection, triggers for intervention, and outcomes.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 6.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: trials and tribulations.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  What is low-risk prostate cancer and what is its natural history?

Authors:  Helen O'Donnell; Chris Parker
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  The role of magnetic resonance imaging in delineating clinically significant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Karim Chamie; Geoffrey A Sonn; David S Finley; Nelly Tan; Daniel J A Margolis; Steven S Raman; Shyam Natarajan; Jiaoti Huang; Robert E Reiter
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Counterpoint: Prostate-specific antigen velocity is not of value for early detection of cancer.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 11.908

10.  Pro-prostate-specific antigen measurements in serum and tissue are associated with treatment necessity among men enrolled in expectant management for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Danil V Makarov; Sumit Isharwal; Lori J Sokoll; Patricia Landis; Cameron Marlow; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin; H Ballentine Carter; Robert W Veltri
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.