Literature DB >> 18762814

Biopsy tissue microarray study of Ki-67 expression in untreated, localized prostate cancer managed by active surveillance.

S Jhavar1, J Bartlett, G Kovacs, C Corbishley, D Dearnaley, R Eeles, V Khoo, R Huddart, A Horwich, A Thompson, A Norman, D Brewer, C S Cooper, C Parker.   

Abstract

Active surveillance provides a unique opportunity to study biomarkers of prostate cancer behaviour, although only small volumes of tumor tissue are typically available. We have evaluated a technique for constructing tissue microarrays (TMAs) from needle biopsies for assessing immunohistochemical markers in localized prostate cancer managed by active surveillance. TMAs were constructed from diagnostic prostate biopsies for 60 patients with localized prostatic adenocarcinoma in a prospective cohort study of active surveillance. Radical treatment was recommended for a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) velocity greater than 1 ng ml(-1) per year or adverse histology in repeat biopsies, defined as Gleason score > or =4+3 or >50% of cores involved. Sections from the TMAs were stained with H&E, P63/AMACR and Ki-67. Time to radical treatment was analysed with respect to clinical characteristics and Ki-67 LI. At a median follow up of 36 months, 25/60 (42%) patients had received radical treatment. On univariate analysis, PSA density (P=0.001), Gleason score (P=0.001), clinical T stage (P=0.01), Ki-67 LI (P=0.02) and initial PSA (P=0.04) were associated with time to radical treatment. On multivariate analysis, PSA density (P=0.01), Ki-67 LI (P=0.03) and Gleason score (P=0.04) were independent determinants of progression to radical treatment. TMAs constructed from prostate needle biopsies can be used to assess immunohistochemical markers in localized prostate cancer managed by active surveillance. Ki-67 LI merits further study as a possible biomarker of early prostate cancer behaviour.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18762814     DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2008.47

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis        ISSN: 1365-7852            Impact factor:   5.554


  15 in total

Review 1.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of clinicopathologic variables and biomarkers for risk stratification.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Sophie M Bruinsma; Joseph Nicholson; Alberto Briganti; Tom Pickles; Yoshiyuki Kakehi; Sigrid V Carlsson; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Serum micronutrient and antioxidant levels at baseline and the natural history of men with localised prostate cancer on active surveillance.

Authors:  Ramachandran Venkitaraman; Karen Thomas; Phillip Grace; David P Dearnaley; Alan Horwich; Robert A Huddart; Christopher C Parker
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2010-02-16

3.  Immunohistochemical expression of minichromosome maintenance complex protein 2 predicts biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer: a tissue microarray and digital imaging analysis-based study of 428 cases.

Authors:  Antoun Toubaji; Siobhan Sutcliffe; Alcides Chaux; Kristen Lecksell; Jessica Hicks; Angelo M De Marzo; Elizabeth A Platz; George J Netto
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.466

4.  ProPSA and diagnostic biopsy tissue DNA content combination improves accuracy to predict need for prostate cancer treatment among men enrolled in an active surveillance program.

Authors:  Sumit Isharwal; Danil V Makarov; Lori J Sokoll; Patricia Landis; Cameron Marlow; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin; H Ballentine Carter; Robert W Veltri
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Novel diagnostic biomarkers for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Chikezie O Madu; Yi Lu
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.207

6.  Pro-prostate-specific antigen measurements in serum and tissue are associated with treatment necessity among men enrolled in expectant management for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Danil V Makarov; Sumit Isharwal; Lori J Sokoll; Patricia Landis; Cameron Marlow; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin; H Ballentine Carter; Robert W Veltri
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 7.  [Prostate cancer. Part 1: Review of cell kinetics over the years 1966-2015 and future perspectives of the new grading of the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP)].

Authors:  B Helpap; L Bubendorf
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.011

8.  Cancer biomarker discovery: the entropic hallmark.

Authors:  Regina Berretta; Pablo Moscato
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  An improved method for constructing tissue microarrays from prostate needle biopsy specimens.

Authors:  F McCarthy; A Fletcher; N Dennis; C Cummings; H O'Donnell; J Clark; P Flohr; R Vergis; S Jhavar; C Parker; C S Cooper
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Prognostic value of Ki-67 for prostate cancer death in a conservatively managed cohort.

Authors:  G Fisher; Z H Yang; S Kudahetti; H Møller; P Scardino; J Cuzick; D M Berney
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.