Literature DB >> 19933956

The prevalence of clinically relevant incidental findings on chest computed tomographic angiograms ordered to diagnose pulmonary embolism.

William B Hall1, Sherstin G Truitt, Leslie P Scheunemann, Sidharth A Shah, M Patricia Rivera, Leonard A Parker, Shannon S Carson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chest computed tomographic angiograms (CTAs) are frequently ordered for evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) in the emergency department, but non-PE findings are often noted. Our objective was to determine the prevalence and management implications of incidental findings on chest CTAs ordered to assess for PE.
METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, we reviewed 589 pulmonary CTAs that were ordered in the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital. We measured the prevalence of PE and placed other findings into the following 3 categories: (1) findings that provided potential alternative explanations for acute symptoms, (2) incidental findings that required clinical or radiologic follow-up, and (3) other findings that required less urgent or no follow-up. We reviewed all newly diagnosed pulmonary nodules and significant thoracic adenopathy and determined standard recommended clinical follow-up.
RESULTS: Pulmonary embolism was found in 55 of 589 CTAs (9%). A total of 195 CTAs (33%) had findings that supported alternative diagnoses. A total of 141 patients (24%) had a new incidental finding that required diagnostic follow-up, including 73 patients (13%) with a new pulmonary nodule and 51 patients (9%) with new adenopathy. Using current clinical guidelines, follow-up computed tomography or another procedure would be recommended for 96% of patients with new incidental pulmonary nodules.
CONCLUSIONS: The CTAs that are ordered in the emergency department are more than twice as likely to find an incidental pulmonary nodule or adenopathy than a PE. Systematic approaches should be developed to help primary care physicians contend with a growing number of clinically relevant incidental radiologic findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19933956     DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  48 in total

1.  Incidental findings in emergency imaging: frequency, recommendations, and compliance with consensus guidelines.

Authors:  Tarek N Hanna; Haris Shekhani; Matthew E Zygmont; James Matthew Kerchberger; Jamlik-Omari Johnson
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-02-03

2.  D-dimer threshold increase with pretest probability unlikely for pulmonary embolism to decrease unnecessary computerized tomographic pulmonary angiography.

Authors:  J A Kline; M M Hogg; D M Courtney; C D Miller; A E Jones; H A Smithline
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.824

3.  The good, bad, and ugly of incidental findings on cardiovascular-computed tomography.

Authors:  Pradeep Bhambhvani
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Incidental Findings in a Decentralized Lung Cancer Screening Program.

Authors:  Katherine Janssen; Kelsey Schertz; Nathan Rubin; Abbie Begnaud
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2019-09

5.  [Incidental findings : Evaluation, management recommendations and legal considerations].

Authors:  P Mildenberger
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Incidental findings in blunt trauma patients: prevalence, follow-up documentation, and risk factors.

Authors:  Melissa K James; Michael P Francois; Gideon Yoeli; Geoffrey K Doughlin; Shi-Wen Lee
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2017-02-09

7.  Actionable vascular and other incidental findings on CTA in patients undergoing acute stroke intervention.

Authors:  Riti Kanesa-Thasan; Mougnyan Cox; Manisha Patel; Brian Curtis; Robert W Hurst; David Kung; Adam E Flanders
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2018-09-21

8.  Predictors of Overtesting in Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis.

Authors:  Safiya Richardson; Eugene Lucas; Stuart L Cohen; Meng Zhang; Guang Qiu; Sundas Khan; Thomas McGinn
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Derivation of a screening tool to identify patients with right ventricular dysfunction or tricuspid regurgitation after negative computerized tomographic pulmonary angiography of the chest.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Kline; Frances M Russell; Tim Lahm; Ronald A Mastouri
Journal:  Pulm Circ       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.017

10.  Incidental findings detection using low tube potential for CT pulmonary angiography.

Authors:  Kanako K Kumamaru; Frank J Rybicki; Rachna Madan; Ritu Gill; Nicole Wake; Andetta R Hunsaker
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.