Nariya Cho1, Woo Kyung Moon, Wonshik Han, In Ae Park, Jihyoung Cho, Dong-Young Noh. 1. Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, and Institute of Radiation Medicine, 101 Daehangno, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the role of axillary lymph node classification by sonography in breast cancer patients by node-to-node correlation with surgical histology and sentinel node biopsy results. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Between June 2006 and December 2006, preoperative axillary sonography was performed in 191 consecutive breast cancer patients (median age, 46 years; age range, 24-79 years) who had been scheduled to undergo breast cancer surgery with sentinel node biopsy. The axillary lymph node that had the thickest cortex or that was closest to the primary tumor was prospectively classified and then removed through sonographically guided needle localization. Correspondence about and histologic results for the needle-localized nodes and the radioactive sentinel nodes were analyzed. The rate of malignancy, according to the sonographic classification, and the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 191 needle-localized nodes, 41 (21%) had metastases and 150 (79%) did not have metastases. When a cutoff point of a cortical thickness of 2.5 mm was used, sonographic classification showed 85% (35/41) sensitivity, 78% (117/150) specificity, and an area under the curve of 0.861 (95% CI, 0.796-0.926). Of the 54 patients with metastases at sentinel node biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection, 13 (24%) had false-negative results of sonographically guided needle localization. Unsuccessful lymphatic mapping because of absent radiotracer uptake during sentinel node biopsy was found in 4% (7/191), whereas all needle-localized nodes with a cortical thickness of more than 2.5 mm were confirmed as metastases. CONCLUSION: Sonographic classification of axillary lymph nodes is effective for predicting the presence of metastases to avoid sentinel node biopsy or to reduce unsuccessful lymphatic mapping during sentinel node biopsy.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the role of axillary lymph node classification by sonography in breast cancerpatients by node-to-node correlation with surgical histology and sentinel node biopsy results. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Between June 2006 and December 2006, preoperative axillary sonography was performed in 191 consecutive breast cancerpatients (median age, 46 years; age range, 24-79 years) who had been scheduled to undergo breast cancer surgery with sentinel node biopsy. The axillary lymph node that had the thickest cortex or that was closest to the primary tumor was prospectively classified and then removed through sonographically guided needle localization. Correspondence about and histologic results for the needle-localized nodes and the radioactive sentinel nodes were analyzed. The rate of malignancy, according to the sonographic classification, and the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 191 needle-localized nodes, 41 (21%) had metastases and 150 (79%) did not have metastases. When a cutoff point of a cortical thickness of 2.5 mm was used, sonographic classification showed 85% (35/41) sensitivity, 78% (117/150) specificity, and an area under the curve of 0.861 (95% CI, 0.796-0.926). Of the 54 patients with metastases at sentinel node biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection, 13 (24%) had false-negative results of sonographically guided needle localization. Unsuccessful lymphatic mapping because of absent radiotracer uptake during sentinel node biopsy was found in 4% (7/191), whereas all needle-localized nodes with a cortical thickness of more than 2.5 mm were confirmed as metastases. CONCLUSION: Sonographic classification of axillary lymph nodes is effective for predicting the presence of metastases to avoid sentinel node biopsy or to reduce unsuccessful lymphatic mapping during sentinel node biopsy.
Authors: Su Min Ha; Jung Min Chang; Soo-Yeon Kim; Su Hyun Lee; Eun Sil Kim; Yeon Soo Kim; Nariya Cho; Woo Kyung Moon Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2021-01-03 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Won Hwa Kim; Hye Jung Kim; So Mi Lee; Seung Hyun Cho; Kyung Min Shin; Sang Yub Lee; Jae Kwang Lim; Won Kee Lee Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2018-08-29 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Paulo Roberto De Alcantara Filho; Carla Curi; Camila Souza Guatelli; Cynthia Aparecida B de Toledo Osorio; Stephania Martins Bezerra; Fernando Augusto Soares; Fabiana Baroni Makdissi Journal: Ann Surg Treat Res Date: 2017-04-27 Impact factor: 1.859
Authors: Sung Eun Song; Bo Kyoung Seo; Seung Hwa Lee; Ann Yie; Ki Yeol Lee; Kyu Ran Cho; Ok Hee Woo; Sang Hoon Cha; Baek Hyun Kim Journal: J Breast Cancer Date: 2012-03-28 Impact factor: 3.588
Authors: Rosalind P Candelaria; Beatriz E Adrada; Kenneth Hess; Lumarie Santiago; Deanna L Lane; Alastair M Thompson; Stacy L Moulder; Monica L Huang; Elsa M Arribas; Gaiane M Rauch; Jessica W T Leung; W Fraser Symmans; Vicente Valero; Elizabeth E Ravenberg; Jason B White; Wei Tse Yang Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2020-07-10 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Hee Yong Kwak; Byung Joo Chae; Ja Seong Bae; Eun Jin Kim; Eun Young Chang; Sang Hoon Kim; Sang Seol Jung; Byung Joo Song Journal: World J Surg Oncol Date: 2013-05-21 Impact factor: 2.754