Literature DB >> 19931402

Phonological processing in post-lingual deafness and cochlear implant outcome.

D S Lazard1, H J Lee, M Gaebler, C A Kell, E Truy, A L Giraud.   

Abstract

Cochlear implants work well, yet the outcome is not fully accounted by the data routinely available to the clinician, and remains unpredictable. A more in-depth understanding of the neural mechanisms that determine the clinical recovery after cochlear implantation is warranted, as they may provide the background for an accurate individual prognosis. In this study in post-lingually deaf adults, we show that while clinical data offer only prognosis trends, fMRI data can prospectively distinguish good from poor implant performers. We show that those deaf cochlear implant (CI) candidates who will become good performers rely on a dorsal phonological route when performing a rhyming task on written regular words. In contrast, those who will become poor performers involve a ventral temporo-frontal route to perform the same task, and abnormally recruit the right supramarginal gyrus, a region that is contralateral to classical phonological regions. These functional patterns reveal that deafness either enhances "normal" phonological processing, or prompts a substitution of phonological processing by lexico-semantic processing. These findings thus suggest that a simple behavioral pre-operative exploration of phonological strategies during reading, to determine which route is predominantly used by CI candidates, might fruitfully inform the outcome. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19931402     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  35 in total

1.  Bilateral reorganization of posterior temporal cortices in post-lingual deafness and its relation to cochlear implant outcome.

Authors:  Diane S Lazard; Hyo-Jeong Lee; Eric Truy; Anne-Lise Giraud
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Impact of the surgical experience on cochleostomy location: a comparative temporal bone study between endaural and posterior tympanotomy approaches for cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Clair Vandersteen; Thomas Demarcy; Coralie Roger; Eric Fontas; Charles Raffaelli; Nicholas Ayache; Hervé Delingette; Nicolas Guevara
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  The role of the salience network in processing lexical and nonlexical stimuli in cochlear implant users: an ALE meta-analysis of PET studies.

Authors:  Jae-Jin Song; Sven Vanneste; Diane S Lazard; Paul Van de Heyning; Joo Hyun Park; Seung Ha Oh; Dirk De Ridder
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Adaptive benefit of cross-modal plasticity following cochlear implantation in deaf adults.

Authors:  Carly A Anderson; Ian M Wiggins; Pádraig T Kitterick; Douglas E H Hartley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Developmental neuroplasticity after cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Andrej Kral; Anu Sharma
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-19       Impact factor: 13.837

6.  Connectivity in Language Areas of the Brain in Cochlear Implant Users as Revealed by fNIRS.

Authors:  Colette M McKay; Adnan Shah; Abd-Krim Seghouane; Xin Zhou; William Cross; Ruth Litovsky
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

7.  Factors Affecting Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipients Implanted With a Perimodiolar Electrode Array Located in Scala Tympani.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Jill B Firszt; Ruth M Reeder; Rosalie M Uchanski; Noël Y Dwyer; Timothy A Holden
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 8.  Neurocognitive factors in sensory restoration of early deafness: a connectome model.

Authors:  Andrej Kral; William G Kronenberger; David B Pisoni; Gerard M O'Donoghue
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 44.182

9.  Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Charles C Finley; Jill B Firszt; Timothy A Holden; Christine Brenner; Lisa G Potts; Brenda D Gotter; Sallie S Vanderhoof; Karen Mispagel; Gitry Heydebrand; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 10.  [Pathophysiology of hearing loss : Classification and treatment options].

Authors:  A Kral
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.284

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.