Literature DB >> 19929106

Token transfers among great apes (Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, and Pan troglodytes): species differences, gestural requests, and reciprocal exchange.

Marie Pelé1, Valérie Dufour, Bernard Thierry, Josep Call.   

Abstract

Great apes appear to be the nonhuman primates most capable of recognizing trading opportunities and engaging in transfers of commodities with conspecifics. Spontaneous exchange of goods between them has not yet been reported. We tested gorillas (Gorilla gorilla), orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus), bonobos (Pan paniscus), and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in a token-exchange task involving two conspecifics and a human experimenter. Tested in pairs, subjects had to exchange tokens with a partner to obtain food from the experimenter. We observed 4, 5, 264, and 328 transfers of tokens in gorillas, chimpanzees, orangutans, and bonobos, respectively. Most gifts were indirect in gorillas, chimpanzees, and bonobos, whereas most were direct in orangutans. The analysis showed no evidence of calculated reciprocity in interactions. A main finding of the study was the high rate of repeated gifts and begging gestures recorded in orangutans. This raises the question of the meaning of pointing in great apes and their ability to understand the communicative intent of others.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19929106     DOI: 10.1037/a0017253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  27 in total

Review 1.  Why mutual helping in most natural systems is neither conflict-free nor based on maximal conflict.

Authors:  Redouan Bshary; Klaus Zuberbühler; Carel P van Schaik
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Calculated reciprocity? A comparative test with six primate species.

Authors:  Federica Amici; Filippo Aureli; Roger Mundry; Alejandro Sánchez Amaro; Abraham Mesa Barroso; Jessica Ferretti; Josep Call
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 2.163

Review 3.  Prosocial primates: selfish and unselfish motivations.

Authors:  Frans B M de Waal; Malini Suchak
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Lack of prosociality in great apes, capuchin monkeys and spider monkeys: convergent evidence from two different food distribution tasks.

Authors:  Federica Amici; Elisabetta Visalberghi; Josep Call
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Rats play tit-for-tat instead of integrating social experience over multiple interactions.

Authors:  Manon K Schweinfurth; Michael Taborsky
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  The evolutionary roots of human decision making.

Authors:  Laurie R Santos; Alexandra G Rosati
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2015-01-03       Impact factor: 24.137

7.  Not by the same token: A female orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus) is selectively prosocial.

Authors:  Hope Emigh; Jordyn Truax; Lauren Highfill; Jennifer Vonk
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 2.163

8.  Chimpanzees ( Pan troglodytes) coordinate by communicating in a collaborative problem-solving task.

Authors:  Alicia P Melis; Michael Tomasello
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Chimpanzees play the ultimatum game.

Authors:  Darby Proctor; Rebecca A Williamson; Frans B M de Waal; Sarah F Brosnan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Calculated reciprocity after all: computation behind token transfers in orang-utans.

Authors:  V Dufour; M Pelé; M Neumann; B Thierry; J Call
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 3.703

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.