Literature DB >> 31813075

Not by the same token: A female orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus) is selectively prosocial.

Hope Emigh1, Jordyn Truax2, Lauren Highfill1, Jennifer Vonk3.   

Abstract

Studies of prosocial behavior in nonhumans have focused on group-living social animals. Despite being highly social and closely related to humans, chimpanzees have rarely exhibited prosocial preferences in experimental tasks. Fewer studies have provided their non group-living relatives-orangutans-with the opportunity to express prosocial preferences. Here, we allowed a single female orangutan to provide rewards for herself and for her mother, sister, or both, across various phases, using a token economy task. The orangutan was more likely to choose prosocially when she could provide rewards to her sister and herself compared to when she could provide rewards to her mother and herself. However, when presented with the simultaneous options of providing rewards for self, self and mother, or self and sister, she chose prosocially equally often to her mother and sister. She made the largest number of prosocial choices in a phase when she could provide rewards to all participants (herself, her sister, and her mother) rather than providing rewards only to herself or only to herself and one other participant. Despite the obvious limitations of a single case study, the study adds to the limited information on prosocial preferences in less social primate species, particularly when given the chance to share food items with different kin.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ape; Kin; Resource allocation; Symbolic prosocial choice task

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31813075     DOI: 10.1007/s10329-019-00780-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Primates        ISSN: 0032-8332            Impact factor:   2.163


  52 in total

1.  Capuchin monkeys are sensitive to others' welfare.

Authors:  Venkat R Lakshminarayanan; Laurie R Santos
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 2.  Prosocial primates: selfish and unselfish motivations.

Authors:  Frans B M de Waal; Malini Suchak
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Chimpanzees do not take advantage of very low cost opportunities to deliver food to unrelated group members.

Authors:  Jennifer Vonk; Sarah F Brosnan; Joan B Silk; Joseph Henrich; Amanda S Richardson; Susan P Lambeth; Steven J Schapiro; Daniel J Povinelli
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 2.844

4.  Spontaneous prosocial choice by chimpanzees.

Authors:  Victoria Horner; J Devyn Carter; Malini Suchak; Frans B M de Waal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Chimpanzees help conspecifics obtain food and non-food items.

Authors:  Alicia P Melis; Felix Warneken; Keith Jensen; Anna-Claire Schneider; Josep Call; Michael Tomasello
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Helping behaviour and regard for others in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Jennifer L Barnes; Tyler Hill; Melanie Langer; Margaret Martinez; Laurie R Santos
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Capuchins' (Cebus apella) sensitivity to others' goal-directed actions in a helping context.

Authors:  Lindsey A Drayton; Laurie R Santos
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Monkeys benefit from reciprocity without the cognitive burden.

Authors:  Malini Suchak; Frans B M de Waal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Tolerance and reward equity predict cooperation in ravens (Corvus corax).

Authors:  Jorg J M Massen; Caroline Ritter; Thomas Bugnyar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Rats prefer mutual rewards in a prosocial choice task.

Authors:  Julen Hernandez-Lallement; Marijn van Wingerden; Christine Marx; Milan Srejic; Tobias Kalenscher
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  1 in total

1.  Adult bonobos show no prosociality in both prosocial choice task and group service paradigm.

Authors:  Jonas Verspeek; Edwin J C van Leeuwen; Daan W Laméris; Nicky Staes; Jeroen M G Stevens
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.984

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.