Literature DB >> 19927696

The time course of the amplitude and latency in the auditory late response evoked by repeated tone bursts.

Fawen Zhang1, James Eliassen, Jill Anderson, Peter Scheifele, David Brown.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study provides a detailed description of the time course of amplitude and latency in the auditory late response (ALR) elicited by repeated tone bursts. RESEARCH
DESIGN: Tone bursts (50 and 80 dB SPL) were presented via insert earphones in trains of ten with interstimulus intervals (ISIs) of 0.7 and 2 msec and an intertrain interval of 15 sec. Averages were derived independently for each tone burst within the train across the total number of train presentations. STUDY SAMPLE: Participants were 14 normal-hearing young adults. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were analyzed in terms of the amplitudes and latencies of the N1 and P2 waves of the ALR as well as the N1-P2 amplitude.
RESULTS: The N1-P2 amplitude was a more stable measure than the amplitude of individual N1 and P2 peaks. The N1-P2 amplitude was maximal for the first tone burst and decreased in a nonmonotonic pattern for the remainder of the tone bursts within a stimulus train. The amplitude decrement was dependent on stimulus intensity and ISI. The latencies of N1 and P2 were maximal for the first tone burst and reduced approximately 20% for the rest of the stimuli in a train. The time course of N1 and P2 latencies was not dependent on stimulus intensity and ISI.
CONCLUSIONS: The reduction of latency in the time course of the ALR might be related to the fact that neurons with shorter latencies had faster recovery speed from adaptation and/or refractoriness than those with longer latencies. This finding is meaningful in the context of future research to restore normal adaptation in abnormal hearing populations such as cochlear implant patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19927696     DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.20.4.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  7 in total

1.  Mismatch negativity and adaptation measures of the late auditory evoked potential in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Fawen Zhang; Theresa Hammer; Holly-Lolan Banks; Chelsea Benson; Jing Xiang; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  The adaptive pattern of the auditory N1 peak revealed by standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography.

Authors:  Fawen Zhang; Aniruddha Deshpande; Chelsea Benson; Mathew Smith; James Eliassen; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 3.  Objective evidence of temporal processing deficits in older adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Hanin Karawani
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-08-16       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Neural adaptation and behavioral measures of temporal processing and speech perception in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Fawen Zhang; Chelsea Benson; Dora Murphy; Melissa Boian; Michael Scott; Robert Keith; Jing Xiang; Paul Abbas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Automatic processing of abstract musical tonality.

Authors:  Inyong Choi; Hari M Bharadwaj; Scott Bressler; Psyche Loui; Kyogu Lee; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 6.  Vowels and Consonants in the Brain: Evidence from Magnetoencephalographic Studies on the N1m in Normal-Hearing Listeners.

Authors:  Anna Dora Manca; Mirko Grimaldi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-09-22

7.  Estimation of auditory steady-state responses based on the averaging of independent EEG epochs.

Authors:  Pavel Prado-Gutierrez; Eduardo Martínez-Montes; Alejandro Weinstein; Matías Zañartu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.