Literature DB >> 21658681

The adaptive pattern of the auditory N1 peak revealed by standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography.

Fawen Zhang1, Aniruddha Deshpande, Chelsea Benson, Mathew Smith, James Eliassen, Qian-Jie Fu.   

Abstract

The N1 peak in the late auditory evoked potential (LAEP) decreases in amplitude following stimulus repetition, displaying an adaptive pattern. The present study explored the functional neural substrates that may underlie the N1 adaptive pattern using standardized Low Resolution Electromagnetic Tomography (sLORETA). Fourteen young normal hearing (NH) listeners participated in the study. Tone bursts (80 dB SPL) were binaurally presented via insert earphones in trains of 10; the inter-stimulus interval was 0.7s and the inter-train interval was 15s. Current source density analysis was performed for the N1 evoked by the 1st, 2nd and 10th stimuli (S(1), S(2) and S(10)) at 3 different timeframes that corresponded to the latency ranges of the N1 waveform subcomponents (70-100, 100-130 and 130-160 ms). The data showed that S(1) activated broad regions in different cortical lobes and the activation was much smaller for S(2) and S(10). Response differences in the LAEP waveform and sLORETA were observed between S(1) and S(2), but not between the S(2) and S(10). The sLORETA comparison map between S(1) and S(2) responses showed that the activation was located in the parietal lobe for the 70-100 ms timeframe, the frontal and limbic lobes for the 100-130 ms timeframe, and the frontal lobe for the 130-160 ms timeframe. These sLORETA comparison results suggest a parieto-frontal network that might help to sensitize the brain to novel stimuli by filtering out repetitive and irrelevant stimuli. This study demonstrates that sLORETA may be useful for identifying generators of scalp-recorded event related potentials and for examining the physiological features of these generators. This technique could be especially useful for cortical source localization in individuals who cannot be examined with functional magnetic resonance imaging or magnetoencephalography (e.g., cochlear implant users).
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21658681      PMCID: PMC3128380          DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.05.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  57 in total

1.  Responses of neurons to click-pairs as simulated echoes: auditory nerve to auditory cortex.

Authors:  D C Fitzpatrick; S Kuwada; D O Kim; K Parham; R Batra
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Differential contribution of frontal and temporal cortices to auditory change detection: fMRI and ERP results.

Authors:  Bertram Opitz; Teemu Rinne; Axel Mecklinger; D Yves von Cramon; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Speech-evoked cortical potentials and speech recognition in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  P A Groenen; A J Beynon; A F Snik; P van den Broek
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  2001

Review 4.  The neurophysiology of auditory perception: from single units to evoked potentials.

Authors:  Jos J Eggermont; Curtis W Ponton
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details.

Authors:  R D Pascual-Marqui
Journal:  Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002

6.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis.

Authors:  Arnaud Delorme; Scott Makeig
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 7.  The orientating reflex: the "targeting reaction" and "searchlight of attention".

Authors:  E N Sokolov; N I Nezlina; V B Polyanskii; D V Evtikhin
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug

8.  Frontal and temporal dysfunction of auditory stimulus processing in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Jürgen Gallinat; Christoph Mulert; Malek Bajbouj; Werner M Herrmann; Jürgen Schunter; Daniel Senkowski; Renata Moukhtieva; Daniela Kronfeldt; Georg Winterer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  The adaptive pattern of the late auditory evoked potential elicited by repeated stimuli in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Fawen Zhang; Jill Anderson; Ravi Samy; Lisa Houston
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.117

10.  Matching the neural adaptation in the rat ventral cochlear nucleus produced by artificial (electric) and acoustic stimulation of the cochlea.

Authors:  Gérard Loquet; Marco Pelizzone; Gregory Valentini; Eric M Rouiller
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.854

View more
  7 in total

1.  Aging Affects Adaptation to Sound-Level Statistics in Human Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Björn Herrmann; Burkhard Maess; Ingrid S Johnsrude
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Neural adaptation and behavioral measures of temporal processing and speech perception in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Fawen Zhang; Chelsea Benson; Dora Murphy; Melissa Boian; Michael Scott; Robert Keith; Jing Xiang; Paul Abbas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Inhibitory Control Impairment on Somatosensory Gating Due to Aging: An Event-Related Potential Study.

Authors:  Juan L Terrasa; Pedro Montoya; Ana M González-Roldán; Carolina Sitges
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Age differences in the neuroelectric adaptation to meaningful sounds.

Authors:  Ada W S Leung; Yu He; Cheryl L Grady; Claude Alain
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Auditory event-related brain potentials for an early discrimination between normal and pathological brain aging.

Authors:  Juliana Dushanova; Mario Christov
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 5.135

6.  The Effect of Side of Implantation on the Cortical Processing of Frequency Changes in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Chun Liang; Lisa H Wenstrup; Ravi N Samy; Jing Xiang; Fawen Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  N1 Repetition-Attenuation for Acoustically Variable Speech and Spectrally Rotated Speech.

Authors:  Ellen Marklund; Lisa Gustavsson; Petter Kallioinen; Iris-Corinna Schwarz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.169

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.