OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of interactive dedicated training on radiology fellows' accuracy in assessing prostate cancer on MRI. METHODS: Eleven radiology fellows, blinded to clinical and pathological data, independently interpreted preoperative prostate MRI studies, scoring the likelihood of tumour in the peripheral and transition zones and extracapsular extension. Each fellow interpreted 15 studies before dedicated training (to supply baseline interpretation accuracy) and 200 studies (10/week) after attending didactic lectures. Expert radiologists led weekly interactive tutorials comparing fellows' interpretations to pathological tumour maps. To assess interpretation accuracy, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted, using pathological findings as the reference standard. RESULTS: In identifying peripheral zone tumour, fellows' average area under the ROC curve (AUC) increased from 0.52 to 0.66 (after didactic lectures; p<0.0001) and remained at 0.66 (end of training; p<0.0001); in the transition zone, their average AUC increased from 0.49 to 0.64 (after didactic lectures; p=0.01) and to 0.68 (end of training; p=0.001). In detecting extracapsular extension, their average AUC increased from 0.50 to 0.67 (after didactic lectures; p=0.003) and to 0.81 (end of training; p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Interactive dedicated training significantly improved accuracy in tumour localization and especially in detecting extracapsular extension on prostate MRI.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of interactive dedicated training on radiology fellows' accuracy in assessing prostate cancer on MRI. METHODS: Eleven radiology fellows, blinded to clinical and pathological data, independently interpreted preoperative prostate MRI studies, scoring the likelihood of tumour in the peripheral and transition zones and extracapsular extension. Each fellow interpreted 15 studies before dedicated training (to supply baseline interpretation accuracy) and 200 studies (10/week) after attending didactic lectures. Expert radiologists led weekly interactive tutorials comparing fellows' interpretations to pathological tumour maps. To assess interpretation accuracy, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted, using pathological findings as the reference standard. RESULTS: In identifying peripheral zone tumour, fellows' average area under the ROC curve (AUC) increased from 0.52 to 0.66 (after didactic lectures; p<0.0001) and remained at 0.66 (end of training; p<0.0001); in the transition zone, their average AUC increased from 0.49 to 0.64 (after didactic lectures; p=0.01) and to 0.68 (end of training; p=0.001). In detecting extracapsular extension, their average AUC increased from 0.50 to 0.67 (after didactic lectures; p=0.003) and to 0.81 (end of training; p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Interactive dedicated training significantly improved accuracy in tumour localization and especially in detecting extracapsular extension on prostate MRI.
Authors: M D Rifkin; E A Zerhouni; C A Gatsonis; L E Quint; D M Paushter; J I Epstein; U Hamper; P C Walsh; B J McNeil Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1990-09-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: M L Schiebler; B C Yankaskas; C Tempany; C E Spritzer; M D Rifkin; H M Pollack; P Holtz; E A Zerhouni Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 1992-03 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Liang Wang; Michael Mullerad; Hui-Ni Chen; Steven C Eberhardt; Michael W Kattan; Peter T Scardino; Hedvig Hricak Journal: Radiology Date: 2004-05-27 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Michael Mullerad; Hedvig Hricak; Liang Wang; Hui-Ni Chen; Michael W Kattan; Peter T Scardino Journal: Radiology Date: 2004-05-27 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Armando Stabile; Francesco Giganti; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Samir S Taneja; Geert Villeirs; Inderbir S Gill; Clare Allen; Mark Emberton; Caroline M Moore; Veeru Kasivisvanathan Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2019-07-17 Impact factor: 14.432
Authors: Hebert Alberto Vargas; Oguz Akin; Amita Shukla-Dave; Jingbo Zhang; Kristen L Zakian; Junting Zheng; Kent Kanao; Debra A Goldman; Chaya S Moskowitz; Victor E Reuter; James A Eastham; Peter T Scardino; Hedvig Hricak Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-09-05 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Andreas M Hötker; Andreas Meier; Yousef Mazaheri; Junting Zheng; Marinela Capanu; Joshua Chaim; Ramon Sosa; Jonathan Coleman; Hedvig Hricak; Oguz Akin Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2019-01
Authors: Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Luke A Ginocchio; Daniel Cornfeld; Adam T Froemming; Rajan T Gupta; Baris Turkbey; Antonio C Westphalen; James S Babb; Daniel J Margolis Journal: Radiology Date: 2016-04-01 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Eva M Serrao; Tristan Barrett; Karan Wadhwa; Deepak Parashar; Julia Frey; Brendan C Koo; Anne Y Warren; Andrew Doble; Christof Kastner; Ferdia A Gallagher Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2015-12-14 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Toshitaka Shin; Thomas B Smyth; Osamu Ukimura; Nariman Ahmadi; Andre Luis de Castro Abreu; Chisato Ohe; Masakatsu Oishi; Hiromitsu Mimata; Inderbir S Gill Journal: BJU Int Date: 2017-08-16 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Kirema Garcia-Reyes; Niccolò M Passoni; Mark L Palmeri; Christopher R Kauffman; Kingshuk Roy Choudhury; Thomas J Polascik; Rajan T Gupta Journal: Abdom Imaging Date: 2015-01
Authors: B Calio; A Sidana; D Sugano; S Gaur; A Jain; M Maruf; S Xu; P Yan; J Kruecker; M Merino; P Choyke; B Turkbey; B Wood; P Pinto Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 5.554