Literature DB >> 1609100

Improvement in mammography interpretation skills in a community radiology practice after dedicated teaching courses: 2-year medical audit of 38,633 cases.

M N Linver1, S B Paster, R D Rosenberg, C R Key, C A Stidley, W V King.   

Abstract

The authors conducted a complete audit of results of 38,633 mammographic examinations performed by 12 general radiologists during a 2-year period with a computerized reporting system. During this period, 11 group members attended 17 dedicated mammography courses. Audit results were analyzed for each radiologist and the entire group. In the 2nd year, the number of breast cancers diagnosed increased 50% (from 121 to 181), with a 6.5% increase in patient volume. Sensitivity increased from 80% to 87%, and there was no change in the positive predictive value of 32%. Median tumor size and node positivity decreased. Most major variables of population and technical factors were unchanged. Diagnostic approach was altered during the 2nd year, as shown by a 50% increase in the use of spot compression, magnification views, and sonography. Analysis of each radiologist's performance before and after attending mammography courses showed similar changes. These data suggest that dedicated mammography courses can help improve radiologists' performance and alter their interpretive approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1609100     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.184.1.1609100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  17 in total

1.  Individualized computer-aided education in mammography based on user modeling: concept and preliminary experiments.

Authors:  Maciej A Mazurowski; Jay A Baker; Huiman X Barnhart; Georgia D Tourassi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Impact of an educational intervention designed to reduce unnecessary recall during screening mammography.

Authors:  Patricia A Carney; Linn Abraham; Andrea Cook; Stephen A Feig; Edward A Sickles; Diana L Miglioretti; Berta M Geller; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Educational interventions to improve screening mammography interpretation: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Berta M Geller; Andy Bogart; Patricia A Carney; Edward A Sickles; Robert Smith; Barbara Monsees; Lawrence W Bassett; Diana M Buist; Karla Kerlikowske; Tracy Onega; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Sebastien Haneuse; Deirdre Hill; Matthew G Wallis; Diana Miglioretti
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Feasibility and acceptability of conducting a randomized clinical trial designed to improve interpretation of screening mammography.

Authors:  Patricia A Carney; Andy Bogart; Edward A Sickles; Robert Smith; Diana S M Buist; Karla Kerlikowske; Tracy Onega; Diana L Miglioretti; Robert Rosenberg; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Berta M Geller
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  A content-boosted collaborative filtering algorithm for personalized training in interpretation of radiological imaging.

Authors:  Hongli Lin; Xuedong Yang; Weisheng Wang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Surgical mammography reporting in a limited resource environment.

Authors:  John P Mouton; Justus Apffelstaedt; Karin Baatjes
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  Screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Katrina Armstrong; Constance D Lehman; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  When radiologists perform best: the learning curve in screening mammogram interpretation.

Authors:  Diana L Miglioretti; Charlotte C Gard; Patricia A Carney; Tracy L Onega; Diana S M Buist; Edward A Sickles; Karla Kerlikowske; Robert D Rosenberg; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Berta M Geller; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Diagnosis of breast tumors after breast reduction.

Authors:  G M Beer; P Kompatscher; K Hergan
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.326

10.  Interactive dedicated training curriculum improves accuracy in the interpretation of MR imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Oguz Akin; Christopher C Riedl; Nicole M Ishill; Chaya S Moskowitz; Jingbo Zhang; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.