Literature DB >> 19920849

Islands of speciation or mirages in the desert? Examining the role of restricted recombination in maintaining species.

M A F Noor1, S M Bennett.   

Abstract

Over the past decade, many studies documented high genetic divergence between closely related species in genomic regions experiencing restricted recombination in hybrids, such as within chromosomal rearrangements or areas adjacent to centromeres. Such regions have been called 'islands of speciation' because of their presumed role in maintaining the integrity of species despite gene flow elsewhere in the genome. Here, we review alternative explanations for such patterns. Segregation of ancestral variation or artifacts of nucleotide diversity within species can readily lead to higher F(ST) in regions of restricted recombination than other parts of the genome, even in the complete absence of interspecies gene flow, and thereby cause investigators to erroneously conclude that islands of speciation exist. We conclude by discussing strengths and weaknesses of various means for testing the role of restricted recombination in maintaining species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19920849      PMCID: PMC2809014          DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2009.151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  54 in total

1.  A test of the chromosomal rearrangement model of speciation in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  Kirsten M Brown; Lisa M Burk; Loren M Henagan; Mohamed A F Noor
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Evaluation of the genomic extent of effects of fixed inversion differences on intraspecific variation and interspecific gene flow in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.

Authors:  Carlos A Machado; Tamara S Haselkorn; Mohamed A F Noor
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  A species definition for the modern synthesis.

Authors:  J Mallet
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Estimating ancestral population parameters.

Authors:  J Wakeley; J Hey
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene.

Authors:  J M Smith; J Haigh
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 1.588

6.  Hybrid zones and the genetic architecture of a barrier to gene flow between two sunflower species.

Authors:  L H Rieseberg; J Whitton; K Gardner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Evidence for inversion polymorphism related to sympatric host race formation in the apple maggot fly, Rhagoletis pomonella.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Feder; Joseph B Roethele; Kenneth Filchak; Julie Niedbalski; Jeanne Romero-Severson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Revisiting the Impact of Inversions in Evolution: From Population Genetic Markers to Drivers of Adaptive Shifts and Speciation?

Authors:  Ary A Hoffmann; Loren H Rieseberg
Journal:  Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 13.915

9.  Consequences of recombination rate variation on quantitative trait locus mapping studies. Simulations based on the Drosophila melanogaster genome.

Authors:  M A Noor; A L Cunningham; J C Larkin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Linkage-dependent gene flow in a house mouse chromosomal hybrid zone.

Authors:  Thadsin Panithanarak; Heidi C Hauffe; John F Dallas; Anita Glover; Richard G Ward; Jeremy B Searle
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  132 in total

Review 1.  Divergence hitchhiking and the spread of genomic isolation during ecological speciation-with-gene-flow.

Authors:  Sara Via
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Establishment of new mutations under divergence and genome hitchhiking.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Feder; Richard Gejji; Sam Yeaman; Patrik Nosil
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  No evidence for biased co-transmission of speciation islands in Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  Matthew W Hahn; Bradley J White; Christopher D Muir; Nora J Besansky
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Recombination rate variation and speciation: theoretical predictions and empirical results from rabbits and mice.

Authors:  Michael W Nachman; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Genomic divergence during speciation: causes and consequences.

Authors:  Patrik Nosil; Jeffrey L Feder
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Evolutionary biology: Expanding islands of speciation.

Authors:  Erin S Kelleher; Daniel A Barbash
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Gene flow-dependent genomic divergence between Anopheles gambiae M and S forms.

Authors:  David Weetman; Craig S Wilding; Keith Steen; João Pinto; Martin J Donnelly
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  The Effects of Background and Interference Selection on Patterns of Genetic Variation in Subdivided Populations.

Authors:  Kai Zeng; Pádraic Corcoran
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-10-04       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Genomic islands of differentiation in two songbird species reveal candidate genes for hybrid female sterility.

Authors:  Libor Mořkovský; Václav Janoušek; Jiří Reif; Jakub Rídl; Jan Pačes; Lukáš Choleva; Karel Janko; Michael W Nachman; Radka Reifová
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 6.185

10.  Chromosomal evolution and patterns of introgression in helianthus.

Authors:  Jessica G Barb; John E Bowers; Sebastien Renaut; Juan I Rey; Steven J Knapp; Loren H Rieseberg; John M Burke
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.