Literature DB >> 19920586

Selective versus nonselective losses in glaucoma.

C A Johnson1.   

Abstract

This article reviews the histopathologic and psychophysical evidence for selective losses to specific subpopulations of optic nerve fibers in glaucoma. Based on this evaluation, the degree to which these losses are selective is drawn into question, and a distinction is drawn between selective tests and selective losses. An alternative hypothesis for early detection of functional losses in glaucoma, the reduced redundancy hypothesis, is presented. This concept takes into account the redundancy or sampling characteristics of specific subpopulations of optic nerve fibers, as well as the relative amount of glaucomatous loss incurred by each optic nerve fiber subpopulation. An example is presented in which an undersampled subpopulation of optic nerve fibers with minimal redundancy is better able to reveal early losses, even though there are greater amounts of relative loss for other optic nerve fiber subpopulations. The design of psychophysical tests for early detection of functional losses in glaucoma should take into account both the relative amounts of loss for various subpopulations of optic nerve fibers and their inherent redundancy or sampling properties.

Entities:  

Year:  1994        PMID: 19920586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  28 in total

1.  Psychophysical characterisation of early functional loss in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

Authors:  E A Ansari; J E Morgan; R J Snowden
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Ganglion cell loss and age-related visual loss: a cortical pooling analysis.

Authors:  Pauline M Pearson; Laura A Schmidt; Emily Ly-Schroeder; William H Swanson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Open angle glaucoma effects on preattentive visual search efficiency for flicker, motion displacement and orientation pop-out tasks.

Authors:  James Loughman; Peter Davison; Ian Flitcroft
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Mathematical modeling approaches in the study of glaucoma disparities among people of African and European descents.

Authors:  Giovanna Guidoboni; Alon Harris; Julia C Arciero; Brent A Siesky; Annahita Amireskandari; Austin L Gerber; Andrew H Huck; Nathaniel J Kim; Simone Cassani; Lucia Carichino
Journal:  J Coupled Syst Multiscale Dyn       Date:  2013-04-01

5.  Accuracy of isolated-check visual evoked potential technique for diagnosing primary open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Li Juan Xu; Liang Zhang; Sha Ling Li; Vance Zemon; Gianni Virgili; Yuan Bo Liang
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 6.  Functional assessment of glaucoma: Uncovering progression.

Authors:  Rongrong Hu; Lyne Racette; Kelly S Chen; Chris A Johnson
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-26       Impact factor: 6.048

Review 7.  Perceptive aspects of visual aura.

Authors:  Carlo Aleci; William Liboni
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.307

8.  Variability in short-wavelength automated perimetry among peri- or postmenopausal women: a dependence on phyto-oestrogen consumption?

Authors:  Alvin Eisner; Shaban Demirel
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.761

9.  Is there evidence for continued learning over multiple years in perimetry?

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner; Shaban Demirel; Chris A Johnson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  [Sensitivity and specificity of flicker perimetry with Pulsar. Comparison with achromatic (white-on-white) perimetry in glaucoma patients].

Authors:  K Göbel; C Erb
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.