Literature DB >> 19918924

Modeling excess lung cancer risk among screened arm participants in the Mayo Lung Project.

Deborah L Goldwasser1, Marek Kimmel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Mayo Lung Project (MLP) was a randomized clinical trial designed to test whether periodic screening by chest x-ray reduced lung cancer (LC) mortality in men who were high-risk smokers. Among MLP participants, there were more deaths from LC in the screening arm both at the trial's end and after long-term follow-up. Overdiagnosis was cited widely as an explanation for the MLP results, whereas a role for excess LC risk attributable to undergoing numerous chest x-ray screenings largely was unexamined. The authors of this report examined the consistency of the MLP data with a modified 2-stage clonal expansion (TSCE) model of excess LC risk.
METHODS: By using a simulation model calibrated to the initial MLP data, the authors examined the expected statistical variance of LC incidence and mortality between the screening and control arms. A Bayesian estimation framework using a modified version of the TSCE model to evaluate the role of excess LC risk attributable to chest x-ray screening was derived and applied to the MLP data.
RESULTS: Simulation experiments indicated that the overall difference in LC deaths and incidence between the study arm and the control arm was unlikely (P = .0424 and P = .0104, respectively) assuming no excess risk of LC. The authors estimated that the 10-year excess LC risk for a man aged 60 years who smoked and who received 10 chest x-ray screenings was 0.574% (P = .0021).
CONCLUSIONS: The excess LC risk observed among screening arm participants was found to be statistically significant with respect to the TSCE model framework in part because of the incorporation of key risk correlates of age and screen frequency into the estimation framework. Copyright 2010 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19918924      PMCID: PMC2807892          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  36 in total

Review 1.  Radiation exposure associated with imaging of the chest: comparison of different radiographic and computed tomography techniques.

Authors:  S Diederich; H Lenzen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Lung cancer after treatment for Hodgkin's disease: focus on radiation effects.

Authors:  E S Gilbert; M Stovall; M Gospodarowicz; F E Van Leeuwen; M Andersson; B Glimelius; T Joensuu; C F Lynch; R E Curtis; E Holowaty; H Storm; E Pukkala; M B van't Veer; J F Fraumeni; J D Boice; E A Clarke; L B Travis
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries.

Authors:  Amy Berrington de González; Sarah Darby
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-01-31       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Analysis of lung cancer incidence in the Nurses' Health and the Health Professionals' Follow-Up Studies using a multistage carcinogenesis model.

Authors:  Rafael Meza; William D Hazelton; Graham A Colditz; Suresh H Moolgavkar
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2007-12-06       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Modeling of long-term screening for lung carcinoma.

Authors:  O Y Gorlova; M Kimmel; C Henschke
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Increased risk of lung cancer after breast cancer radiation therapy in cigarette smokers.

Authors:  A I Neugut; T Murray; J Santos; H Amols; M K Hayes; J T Flannery; E Robinson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1994-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958-1998.

Authors:  D L Preston; E Ron; S Tokuoka; S Funamoto; N Nishi; M Soda; K Mabuchi; K Kodama
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  Radiation risks potentially associated with low-dose CT screening of adult smokers for lung cancer.

Authors:  David J Brenner
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Estimating radiation-induced cancer risks at very low doses: rationale for using a linear no-threshold approach.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Rainer K Sachs
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 1.925

10.  A two-stage theory of carcinogenesis in relation to the age distribution of human cancer.

Authors:  P ARMITAGE; R DOLL
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1957-06       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  1 in total

1.  Exploring the uncertainties of early detection results: model-based interpretation of mayo lung project.

Authors:  Lu Shi; Haijun Tian; William J McCarthy; Barbara Berman; Shinyi Wu; Rob Boer
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 4.430

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.