Literature DB >> 11147626

Radiation exposure associated with imaging of the chest: comparison of different radiographic and computed tomography techniques.

S Diederich1, H Lenzen.   

Abstract

Exposure to ionizing radiation due to radiologic examinations is associated with the risk of induction of malignancy. This has to be balanced against the potential benefits of detection of a malignant tumor with radiologic examinations. For comparison of radiation exposure levels from different sources, the concept of effective dose equivalent was developed, which is used to assess an individual's risk of developing malignancy. Effective dose equivalent ranges from 0.06 to 0.25 millisieverts (mSv) with chest radiography in 2 views, 3-27 mSv with computed tomography (CT) using conventional examination parameters, and 0.3-0.55 mSv using low dose CT settings. These values can be compared with radiation exposure levels from natural sources (on average 2.4 mSv per year in Germany). Based on considerations by the International Commission on Radiological Protection, it can be expected that radiation exposure with an effective dose equivalent of 1 mSv would lead to 5 additional malignancies in 100,000 individuals exposed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11147626     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(20001201)89:11+<2457::aid-cncr22>3.3.co;2-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  24 in total

1.  Coronal thick CT reconstruction: an alternative for initial chest radiography in trauma patients.

Authors:  Hatem Alkadhi; Bernhard Baumert; Simon Wildermuth; Konrad E Bloch; Borut Marincek; Thomas Boehm
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2005-11-09

2.  The effects of bismuth breast shields in conjunction with automatic tube current modulation in CT imaging.

Authors:  Sabah Servaes; Xiaowei Zhu
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-05-23

3.  Radiation dose and cancer risk in retrospectively and prospectively ECG-gated coronary angiography using 64-slice multidetector CT.

Authors:  B Huang; J Li; M W-M Law; J Zhang; Y Shen; P L Khong
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Agreement between emergency physician diagnosis and radiologist reports in patients discharged from an emergency department with community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  Samuel G Campbell; Daphne D Murray; Ammar Hawass; David Urquhart; Stacy Ackroyd-Stolarz; David Maxwell
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2005-06

Review 5.  Screening for lung cancer.

Authors:  Renée Manser; Anne Lethaby; Louis B Irving; Christine Stone; Graham Byrnes; Michael J Abramson; Don Campbell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-06-21

6.  Assessment of panoramic radiography as a national oral examination tool: review of the literature.

Authors:  Jin-Woo Choi
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2011-03-26

Review 7.  Chest radiographs for acute lower respiratory tract infections.

Authors:  Amy Millicent Y Cao; Joleen P Choy; Lakshmi Narayana Mohanakrishnan; Roger F Bain; Mieke L van Driel
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-12-26

8.  [Lung cancer screening: status in 2007].

Authors:  S Diederich
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 0.635

9.  Quantifying pulmonary inflammation in cystic fibrosis with positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Delphine L Chen; Thomas W Ferkol; Mark A Mintun; Jessica E Pittman; Daniel B Rosenbluth; Daniel P Schuster
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 10.  Radiation exposure from chest CT: issues and strategies.

Authors:  Mannudeep K Kalra; Michael M Maher; Stefania Rizzo; David Kanarek; Jo-Anne O Shepard; Jo-Anne O Shephard
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.