Literature DB >> 28503230

Utility of preoperative 3 Tesla pelvic phased-array multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of extracapsular extension and seminal vesicle invasion of prostate cancer and its impact on surgical margin status: Experience at a Canadian academic tertiary care centre.

Taehyoung Lee1, Jen Hoogenes1, Ian Wright1, Edward D Matsumoto1, Bobby Shayegan1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the utility of 3 Tesla (3T) pelvic phased-array (PPA) multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) to predict extracapsular extension (ECE) and seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) and its subsequent effect on radical prostatectomy (RP) surgical margin status.
METHODS: A retrospective evaluation was conducted of RP patients who underwent preoperative 3T PPA mpMRI (without endorectal coil) based on clinical probability of adverse pathological features. Frequencies, specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of mpMRI in predicting the status of ECE and SVI were calculated.
RESULTS: Forty-eight consecutive patients were included. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for 3T PPA mpMRI using T2-weighted sequences with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) imaging to predict ECE was 39%, 56%, 45%, and 50%, respectively, while SVI prediction was 33%, 95%, 50%, and 91%, respectively. Twelve of the 28 cases predicted as being negative for ECE had positive margins, while two of the 20 cases predicted to be positive for ECE had positive margins. Imaging predicted four cases would have SVI, yet two had positive margins, while of the 44 cases predicted as being negative for SVI, four had positive margins.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings at our centre suggest that the use of 3T PPA mpMRI using T2-weighted sequences with DWI and DCE in predicting pathological ECE and SVI is of questionable benefit. These mpMRI reports may result in closer dissection of neurovascular bundles and subsequent positive surgical margins. Caution should be exercised when basing intraoperative decisions on mpMRI findings.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28503230      PMCID: PMC5426937          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.4211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  26 in total

1.  Prediction of prostate cancer extracapsular extension with high spatial resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced 3-T MRI.

Authors:  B Nicolas Bloch; Elizabeth M Genega; Daniel N Costa; Ivan Pedrosa; Martin P Smith; Herbert Y Kressel; Long Ngo; Martin G Sanda; William C Dewolf; Neil M Rofsky
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging has limited clinical ability to preoperatively predict pT3 prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan S Brajtbord; Hugh J Lavery; Fatima Nabizada-Pace; Prathibha Senaratne; David B Samadi
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Predictive models for newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  William T Lowrance; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2009

Review 4.  Radical Prostatectomy for Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: Current Status.

Authors:  Eliney F Faria; Brian F Chapin; Roberto L Muller; Roberto D Machado; Rodolfo B Reis; Surena F Matin
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Underestimated role of MRI in EAU guidelines on prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michele Scialpi; Irene Piscioli; Alfredo D'Andrea
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Gerald W Hull; Farhang Rabbani; Farhat Abbas; Thomas M Wheeler; Michael W Kattan; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Prognostic implications of extracapsular extension of lymph node metastases in prostate cancer.

Authors:  T L Griebling; D Ozkutlu; W A See; M B Cohen
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 7.842

8.  Accuracy of 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging for the staging of prostate cancer in comparison to the Partin tables.

Authors:  H Augustin; G A Fritz; T Ehammer; M Auprich; K Pummer
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.990

Review 9.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: present and future.

Authors:  John Kurhanewicz; Daniel Vigneron; Peter Carroll; Fergus Coakley
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.309

10.  The value of prostate MRI with endorectal coil in detecting seminal vesicle involvement in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mahyar Ghafoori; Manijeh Alavi; Madjid Shakiba; Kamal Hoseini
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2015-01-17       Impact factor: 0.212

View more
  8 in total

1.  Complete bladder neck preservation promotes long-term post-prostatectomy continence without compromising midterm oncological outcome: analysis of a randomised controlled cohort.

Authors:  Joanne N Nyarangi-Dix; Diana Tichy; Gencay Hatiboglu; Sascha Pahernik; Georgi Tosev; Markus Hohenfellner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) fusion imaging in prostate cancer: PET-CT vs PET-MRI.

Authors:  Feng-Yuan Liu; Ting-Wen Sheng; Jing-Ren Tseng; Kai-Jie Yu; Ke-Hong Tsui; Se-Tong Pang; Li-Jen Wang; Gigin Lin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Detectability of prostate cancer in different parts of the gland with 3-Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with whole-mount histopathology.

Authors:  Katsuhiro Ito; Akihiro Furuta; Akira Kido; Yuki Teramoto; Shusuke Akamatsu; Naoki Terada; Toshinari Yamasaki; Takahiro Inoue; Osamu Ogawa; Takashi Kobayashi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  [Imaging of locally advanced prostate cancer : Importance of ultrasound and especially MRI].

Authors:  O Solyanik; B Schlenker; C Gratzke; B Ertl-Wagner; D A Clevert; C Stief; J Ricke; D Nörenberg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for detecting extracapsular extension in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Chen-Lu Liu; Qian Chen; Sheng-Chao Shao; Shuang-Qing Chen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Current Opinion on the Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Staging Prostate Cancer: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Jamie Michael; Kevin Neuzil; Ersan Altun; Marc A Bjurlin
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.989

7.  International Multi-Site Initiative to Develop an MRI-Inclusive Nomogram for Side-Specific Prediction of Extraprostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Andreas G Wibmer; Michael W Kattan; Francesco Alessandrino; Alexander D J Baur; Lars Boesen; Felipe Boschini Franco; David Bonekamp; Riccardo Campa; Hannes Cash; Violeta Catalá; Sebastien Crouzet; Sounil Dinnoo; James Eastham; Fiona M Fennessy; Kamyar Ghabili; Markus Hohenfellner; Angelique W Levi; Xinge Ji; Vibeke Løgager; Daniel J Margolis; Paul C Moldovan; Valeria Panebianco; Tobias Penzkofer; Philippe Puech; Jan Philipp Radtke; Olivier Rouvière; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Preston C Sprenkle; Clare M Tempany; Joan C Vilanova; Jeffrey Weinreb; Hedvig Hricak; Amita Shukla-Dave
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Surgical margin status and its impact on prostate cancer prognosis after radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lijin Zhang; Bin Wu; Zhenlei Zha; Hu Zhao; Jun Yuan; Yuefang Jiang; Wei Yang
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 4.226

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.