Literature DB >> 19917925

Early prediction of response to chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer: reliability of restaging with combined positron emission tomography and computed tomography.

James P Malone1, Michael A T Gerberi, Syam Vasireddy, Larry F Hughes, Krishna Rao, Bruce Shevlin, Matthew Kuhn, Dean Collette, Joel Tennenhouse, K Thomas Robbins.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the role of combined positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET-CT) in predicting early treatment response at the primary site and in the neck after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis with a median follow-up of 24 months.
SETTING: Academic, tertiary referral center. PATIENTS AND
INTERVENTIONS: Thirty-one patients who were treated with concomitant intra-arterial CRT underwent PET-CT 6 to 8 weeks after the completion of treatment. Patients with findings on the physical examination, CT, or PET-CT indicative of persistent disease underwent appropriate surgical intervention for pathological assessment. Patients with a complete clinical response were observed with routine follow-up physical examination for disease recurrence. No evidence of disease at least 6 months after the completion of PET-CT was considered confirmation of complete clinical response. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Presence or absence of residual or recurrent disease during the follow-up period was used to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of PET-CT for the primary site and the neck.
RESULTS: Assessment of tumor response at the primary site with PET-CT had a sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 83%, 54%, 31%, and 92%, respectively. In patients with pretreatment N1 to N3 disease, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of posttreatment PET-CT were 75%, more than 94%, more than 75%, and 94%, respectively, and the specificity and negative predictive value for patients with pretreatment N0 disease in the neck were 92% and more than 92%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Negative PET-CT findings accurately determine early disease response at the primary site and in the neck. False-positive findings are common at the primary site. Patients with a negative PET-CT finding after the completion of intra-arterial CRT do not require surgical intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19917925     DOI: 10.1001/archoto.2009.152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0886-4470


  16 in total

1.  Evaluation of nodal response after intra-arterial chemoradiation for node-positive head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Tomohiro Sakashita; Akihiro Homma; Nobuhiko Oridate; Hiromitsu Hatakeyama; Satoshi Kano; Takatsugu Mizumachi; Satoshi Fukuda
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  PET/CT in head and neck cancer: an update.

Authors:  Roland Hustinx; Giovanni Lucignani
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Diagnostic performance of post-treatment FDG PET or FDG PET/CT imaging in head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tejpal Gupta; Zubin Master; Sadhana Kannan; Jai Prakash Agarwal; Sarbani Ghsoh-Laskar; Venkatesh Rangarajan; Vedang Murthy; Ashwini Budrukkar
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Neck dissection after chemoradiotherapy for oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer: the correlation between cervical lymph node metastasis and prognosis.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Hanai; Daisuke Kawakita; Taijiro Ozawa; Hitoshi Hirakawa; Takeshi Kodaira; Yasuhisa Hasegawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Management of the Neck in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Shlomo A Koyfman; Nofisat Ismaila; Doug Crook; Anil D'Cruz; Cristina P Rodriguez; David J Sher; Damian Silbermins; Erich M Sturgis; Terance T Tsue; Jared Weiss; Sue S Yom; F Christopher Holsinger
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Assessment of treatment response after chemoradiation of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Fernando Luiz Dias
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.075

7.  Retrospective review of positron emission tomography with contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the posttreatment setting in human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Jason Y K Chan; Giuseppe Sanguineti; Jeremy D Richmon; Shanthi Marur; Christine G Gourin; Wayne Koch; Christine H Chung; Harry Quon; Justin A Bishop; Nafi Aygun; Nishant Agrawal
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-11

8.  Early FDG PET at 10 or 20 Gy under chemoradiotherapy is prognostic for locoregional control and overall survival in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Maria Hentschel; Steffen Appold; Andreas Schreiber; Nasreddin Abolmaali; Andrij Abramyuk; Wolfgang Dörr; Joerg Kotzerke; Michael Baumann; Klaus Zöphel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Early prediction of survival following induction chemotherapy with DCF (docetaxel, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil) using FDG PET/CT imaging in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Ronan Abgral; Pierre-Yves Le Roux; Nathalie Keromnes; Jean Rousset; Gérald Valette; Dominique Gouders; Cyril Leleu; Delphine Mollon; Emmanuel Nowak; Solène Querellou; Pierre-Yves Salaün
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 10.  Validation of functional imaging as a biomarker for radiation treatment response.

Authors:  C Jentsch; B Beuthien-Baumann; E G C Troost; G Shakirin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.