Literature DB >> 19913255

Combination of multiple molecular markers can improve prognostication in patients with locally advanced and lymph node positive bladder cancer.

Shahrokh F Shariat1, Daher C Chade, Pierre I Karakiewicz, Raheela Ashfaq, Hendrik Isbarn, Yves Fradet, Patrick J Bastian, Matthew E Nielsen, Umberto Capitanio, Claudio Jeldres, Francesco Montorsi, Seth P Lerner, Arthur I Sagalowsky, Richard J Cote, Yair Lotan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We tested whether the combination of 4 established cell cycle regulators (p53, pRB, p21 and p27) could improve the ability to predict clinical outcomes in a large multi-institutional collaboration of patients with pT3-4N0 or pTany Npositive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. We also assessed whether the combination of molecular markers is superior to any individual biomarker.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study comprised 692 patients with pT3-4N0 or pTany Npositive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder treated with radical cystectomy and bilateral lymphadenectomy (median followup 5.3 years). Scoring was performed using advanced cell imaging and color detection software. The base model incorporated patient age, gender, stage, grade, lymphovascular invasion, number of lymph nodes removed, number of positive lymph nodes, concomitant carcinoma in situ and adjuvant chemotherapy.
RESULTS: Individual molecular markers did not improve the predictive accuracy for disease recurrence and cancer specific mortality. Combination of all 4 molecular markers into number of altered molecular markers resulted in significantly higher predictive accuracy than any single biomarker (p <0.001). Moreover addition of number of altered molecular markers to the base model significantly improved the predictive accuracy for disease recurrence (3.9%, p <0.001) and cancer specific mortality (4.3%, p <0.001). Addition of number of altered molecular markers retained statistical significance for improving the prediction of clinical outcomes in the subgroup of patients with pT3N0 (280), pT4N0 (83) and pTany Npositive (329) disease (p <0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: While the status of individual molecular markers does not add sufficient value to outcome prediction in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, combinations of molecular markers may improve molecular staging, prognostication and possibly prediction of response to therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19913255     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  42 in total

Review 1.  [Upper tract urothelial carcinoma. An update on clinical and pathological prognostic factors].

Authors:  M Rink; M Adam; J Hansen; F K Chun; S A Ahyai; M Remzi; T Schlomm; O Engel; R Heuer; C Eichelberg; M Fisch; R Dahlem; S F Shariat
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  The prognostic role of lymphovascular invasion in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  Romain Mathieu; Ilaria Lucca; Morgan Rouprêt; Alberto Briganti; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  [Urine cytology - update 2013. A systematic review of recent literature].

Authors:  M Böhm; F vom Dorp; M Schostak; O W Hakenberg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  Biomarkers for prognosis and treatment selection in advanced bladder cancer patients.

Authors:  Yuanbin Ru; Garrett M Dancik; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 5.  Prognostic factors for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Thomas F Chromecki; Karim Bensalah; Mesut Remzi; Grégory Verhoest; Eugene K Cha; Douglas S Scherr; Giacomo Novara; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 6.  Predictive tools for clinical decision-making and counseling of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Evanguelos Xylinas; Luis Kluth; Sibani Mangal; Morgan Roupret; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Molecular substratification of bladder cancer: moving towards individualized patient management.

Authors:  Anirban P Mitra
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2016-03-28

8.  C5a receptor expression is associated with poor prognosis in urothelial cell carcinoma patients treated with radical cystectomy or nephroureterectomy.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Wada; Yoshihiro Maeda; Tatsuko Kubo; Ken Kikuchi; Masatoshi Eto; Takahisa Imamura
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 2.967

9.  The Role of Surgery in Metastatic Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mohammad Abufaraj; Guido Dalbagni; Siamak Daneshmand; Simon Horenblas; Ashish M Kamat; Ryu Kanzaki; Alexandre R Zlotta; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Prognostic role of ERCC1 protein expression in upper tract urothelial carcinoma following radical nephroureterectomy with curative intent.

Authors:  Aurélie Mbeutcha; Ilaria Lucca; Vitaly Margulis; Jose A Karam; Christopher G Wood; Michela de Martino; Romain Mathieu; Andrea Haitel; Evanguelos Xylinas; Luis Kluth; Morgan Rouprêt; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Alberto Briganti; Michael Rink; Malte Rieken; Alon Z Weizer; Jay D Raman; Nathalie Rioux-Leclecq; Christian Bolenz; Karim Bensalah; Yair Lotan; Christian Seitz; Mesut Remzi; Shahrokh F Shariat; Tobias Klatte
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.