Literature DB >> 19910760

False-negative transcranial motor-evoked potentials during scoliosis surgery causing paralysis: a case report with literature review.

Hitesh N Modi1, Seung-Woo Suh, Jae-Hyuk Yang, Ji-Yeol Yoon.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Case report.
OBJECTIVE: To report a case of false-negative intraoperative motor-evoked potentials (MEP) that developed paraplegia after surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although several false-negative results have been reported with somatosensory-evoked potentials, there is no report noted with MEP. Therefore, several authors have preferred using MEPs as a gold standard in neuromonitoring.
METHODS: We report a case of false-negative MEP during the scoliosis surgery which is the first report showing false-negative MEPs during operation.
RESULTS: A 15-year-old girl with severe kyphoscoliosis (Cobb angle, 140 degrees) in neurofibromatosis was operated for correction and posterior spinal fusion surgery, using pedicle screw instrumentation. Intraoperative neuromonitoring did not show any change in MEPs throughout the procedure, however, she woke-up with paraplegia. Immediate implant release could not recover her neurology functionally at last follow-up. Positive event during the operation was massive blood loss which could not show drop in MEPs as an ischemic cord injury (probable cause). Postoperative CT scan in both patients did not show any injury with pedicle screw as implants were well placed within the pedicles. Reviewing the literature, we could not find out any prospective study in animals identifying false-negative results with MEPs.
CONCLUSION: From our experience of false-negative MEPs, we conclude that unwanted events with use of MEP in scoliosis or other spinal surgeries. We propose further prospective research on animals to solve this issue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19910760     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b40d4f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  7 in total

1.  Change in body surface temperature as an ancillary measurement to motor evoked potentials.

Authors:  J H Yang; S W Suh; Y-S Park; J-H Lee; B K Park; C H Ham; J W Choi
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Feasibility of Endoscopic Inspection of Pedicle Wall Integrity in a Live Surgery Model.

Authors:  Kristen Radcliff; Harvey Smith; Bobby Kalantar; Robert Isaacs; Barrett Woods; Alexander R Vaccaro; James Brannon
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

3.  Is It Real False Negative Finding in Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring during Corrective Surgery of Ankylosing Spondylitis? A Case Report.

Authors:  Ki-Tack Kim; Sang-Hun Lee; Yoon-Ho Kwack; Eon-Seok Son
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2012-03-09

4.  Optical monitoring and detection of spinal cord ischemia.

Authors:  Rickson C Mesquita; Angela D'Souza; Thomas V Bilfinger; Robert M Galler; Asher Emanuel; Steven S Schenkel; Arjun G Yodh; Thomas F Floyd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Intraoperative neuromonitoring: lessons learned from 32 case events in 2095 spine cases.

Authors:  Matthew Eager; Faisal Jahangiri; Adam Shimer; Francis Shen; Vincent Arlet
Journal:  Evid Based Spine Care J       Date:  2010-08

6.  Monitoring of Motor and Somatosensory Evoked Potentials During Spine Surgery: Intraoperative Changes and Postoperative Outcomes.

Authors:  Shin Hye Chang; Yoon Ghil Park; Dae Hyun Kim; Seo Yeon Yoon
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2016-06-29

7.  Multimodal Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Spine Surgeries: The Experience at a Spine Centre through Years.

Authors:  Deepak Rajappa; Mohd Mazhar Khan; Dheeraj Masapu; Ravi Manchala; Satish Rudrappa; Swaroop Gopal; Ramachandran Govindasamy; Sunil Kumar Horasuku
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2020-12-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.