Literature DB >> 19910376

Determinants of percentage and area measures of mammographic density.

Jennifer Stone1, Ruth M L Warren, Elizabeth Pinney, Jane Warwick, Jack Cuzick.   

Abstract

Mammographic density is one of the strongest predictors of breast cancer risk. Typically expressed as a percentage of the breast area occupied by radiologically dense tissue on a mammogram, its full value may not be realized because of its negative association with body mass index. A simpler measure of mammographic density, independent of other breast cancer risk factors and equally predictive of risk, would be preferable for risk prediction models. Percentage and area measures of mammographic density were determined for 815 women at high risk for breast cancer from the baseline assessments in the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study I, a trial of tamoxifen for breast cancer prevention conducted between 1992 and 2001. Multivariate linear regression was used to assess associations between risk factors and the mammographic measures. Percent dense area was negatively associated with age, body mass index, menopausal status, predicted risk, and smoking status (R(2) = 24%). Dense area was negatively associated with only age and body mass index (R(2) = 7%), and the latter association was much weaker than for percent dense area. Nondense area was positively associated with age, body mass index, and predicted risk (R(2) = 36%). Dense area was not associated with the multitude of risk factors that percent dense area was, making it a simpler biomarker for risk prediction modeling. Both dense area and percent dense area should be presented whenever possible for comparisons in research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19910376     DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwp313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  35 in total

1.  Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer by adiposity: an analysis of four case-control studies.

Authors:  Shannon M Conroy; Christy G Woolcott; Karin R Koga; Celia Byrne; Chisato Nagata; Giske Ursin; Celine M Vachon; Martin J Yaffe; Ian Pagano; Gertraud Maskarinec
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Percent Mammographic Density and Dense Area as Risk Factors for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  C Rauh; C C Hack; L Häberle; A Hein; A Engel; M G Schrauder; P A Fasching; S M Jud; A B Ekici; C R Loehberg; M Meier-Meitinger; S Ozan; R Schulz-Wendtland; M Uder; A Hartmann; D L Wachter; M W Beckmann; K Heusinger
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  Comparison of mammographic density assessed as volumes and areas among women undergoing diagnostic image-guided breast biopsy.

Authors:  Gretchen L Gierach; Berta M Geller; John A Shepherd; Deesha A Patel; Pamela M Vacek; Donald L Weaver; Rachael E Chicoine; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Bo Fan; Amir Pasha Mahmoudzadeh; Jeff Wang; Jason M Johnson; Sally D Herschorn; Louise A Brinton; Mark E Sherman
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  The metabolic syndrome and mammographic breast density in a racially diverse and predominantly immigrant sample of women.

Authors:  Parisa Tehranifar; Angeline Protacio; Karen M Schmitt; Elise Desperito; Sabine Oskar; Alan J Potter; Natalie J Engmann; Mary Beth Terry
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Mammographic density, parity and age at first birth, and risk of breast cancer: an analysis of four case-control studies.

Authors:  Christy G Woolcott; Karin Koga; Shannon M Conroy; Celia Byrne; Chisato Nagata; Giske Ursin; Celine M Vachon; Martin J Yaffe; Ian Pagano; Gertraud Maskarinec
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Reproductive and menstrual factors and mammographic density in African American, Caribbean, and white women.

Authors:  Parisa Tehranifar; Diane Reynolds; Julie Flom; Loralee Fulton; Yuyan Liao; Elizabeth Kudadjie-Gyamfi; Mary Beth Terry
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 2.506

7.  Baseline mammographic breast density and the risk of invasive breast cancer in postmenopausal women participating in the NSABP study of tamoxifen and raloxifene (STAR).

Authors:  Reena S Cecchini; Joseph P Costantino; Jane A Cauley; Walter M Cronin; D Lawrence Wickerham; Hanna Bandos; Joel L Weissfeld; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2012-10-11

8.  Response of bilateral breasts to the endogenous hormonal fluctuation in a menstrual cycle evaluated using 3D MRI.

Authors:  Jeon-Hor Chen; Siwa Chan; Dah-Cherng Yeh; Peter T Fwu; Muqing Lin; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 2.546

9.  Reader variability in breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms: the effect of image postprocessing on relative and absolute measures.

Authors:  Brad M Keller; Diane L Nathan; Sara C Gavenonis; Jinbo Chen; Emily F Conant; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Alcohol intake from early adulthood to midlife and mammographic density.

Authors:  Jasmine A McDonald; Karin B Michels; Barbara A Cohn; Julie D Flom; Parisa Tehranifar; Mary Beth Terry
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 2.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.