Literature DB >> 23219249

Response of bilateral breasts to the endogenous hormonal fluctuation in a menstrual cycle evaluated using 3D MRI.

Jeon-Hor Chen1, Siwa Chan, Dah-Cherng Yeh, Peter T Fwu, Muqing Lin, Min-Ying Su.   

Abstract

The normal breast tissue responds to the fluctuation of endogenous hormones during a menstrual cycle (MC) and shows changes in breast density. The changes between left and right breasts of the same women were compared to evaluate the symmetrical response. Twenty-four healthy women were recruited in this study. Four weekly magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies were performed during one MC. A computer algorithm was used to segment the breast and the fibroglandular tissue to measure the fibroglandular tissue volume (FV) and three morphological parameters: circularity, convexity and irregularity. The coefficient of variation (CV) for each parameter measured among four MRI studies was calculated; also, the maximal percent change between two MRI studies that show the highest and the lowest FV was calculated. These parameters measured from left and right breasts were compared using Pearson correlation. For the FV, the CV measured between left and right breasts of 24 subjects was highly correlated, with r=0.91; the maximal percent difference was also highly correlated, with r=0.93. Overall, the mean left-to-right difference in the measured FV was small: 1.2%±1.1% for CV and 2.6%±2.3% for the maximal percent difference. For the three morphological parameters, the mean left-to-right percentage difference was similar to the differences seen in FV; however, these morphological parameters do not reveal a high functional symmetry between left and right breasts. The results showed that the measured FV from left and right breasts of the same woman revealed a high functional symmetry. Since endogenous hormone plays an important role in the development of breast cancer, it would be interesting to investigate whether the functional asymmetry of response in some patients is associated with the risk of developing unilateral breast cancer.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23219249      PMCID: PMC3597749          DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.10.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  46 in total

1.  A case-control study of mammographic densities in Hawaii.

Authors:  G Maskarinec; L Meng
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Body size, mammographic density, and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Lisa J Martin; Limei Sun; Helen Guo; Anna Chiarelli; Greg Hislop; Martin Yaffe; Salomon Minkin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Morphological changes in breast tissue with menstrual cycle.

Authors:  Rathi Ramakrishnan; Seema A Khan; Sunil Badve
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 7.842

4.  Quantitative analysis of breast parenchymal patterns using 3D fibroglandular tissues segmented based on MRI.

Authors:  Ke Nie; Daniel Chang; Jeon-Hor Chen; Chieh-Chih Hsu; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Association of computerized mammographic parenchymal pattern measure with breast cancer risk: a pilot case-control study.

Authors:  Jun Wei; Heang-Ping Chan; Yi-Ta Wu; Chuan Zhou; Mark A Helvie; Alexander Tsodikov; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Berkman Sahiner
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Developing asymmetry identified on mammography: correlation with imaging outcome and pathologic findings.

Authors:  Jessica W T Leung; Edward A Sickles
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Computerized texture analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns of digitized mammograms.

Authors:  Hui Li; Maryellen L Giger; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Anna Margolis; Li Lan; Michael R Chinander
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Focal asymmetric breast density: mammographic, sonographic and pathological correlation in 97 lesions--a call to restrain biopsies.

Authors:  Fani Sperber; Ur Metser; Andrea Gat; Anat Shalmon; Neora Yaal-Hahoshen
Journal:  Isr Med Assoc J       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 0.892

9.  Positive predictive value of specific mammographic findings according to reader and patient variables.

Authors:  Aruna Venkatesan; Philip Chu; Karla Kerlikowske; Edward A Sickles; Rebecca Smith-Bindman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Texture features from mammographic images and risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Armando Manduca; Michael J Carston; John J Heine; Christopher G Scott; V Shane Pankratz; Kathy R Brandt; Thomas A Sellers; Celine M Vachon; James R Cerhan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 4.254

View more
  3 in total

1.  Near Field Breast Tumor Detection Using Ultra-Narrow Band Probe with Machine Learning Techniques.

Authors:  Maged A Aldhaeebi; Thamer S Almoneef; Abdulbaset Ali; Zhao Ren; Omar M Ramahi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Ethnic and age differences in right-left breast asymmetry in a large population-based screening population.

Authors:  Sue M Hudson; Louise S Wilkinson; Rachel Denholm; Bianca L De Stavola; Isabel Dos-Santos-Silva
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 3.629

3.  Comprehensive analysis of haemostatic profile depending on clinicopathological determinants in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Piotr Rhone; Barbara Ruszkowska-Ciastek; Kornel Bielawski; Alen Brkic; Elżbieta Zarychta; Barbara Góralczyk; Krzysztof Roszkowski; Danuta Rość
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 3.840

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.