Literature DB >> 25258465

Percent Mammographic Density and Dense Area as Risk Factors for Breast Cancer.

C Rauh1, C C Hack1, L Häberle1, A Hein1, A Engel1, M G Schrauder1, P A Fasching1, S M Jud1, A B Ekici2, C R Loehberg1, M Meier-Meitinger3, S Ozan1, R Schulz-Wendtland3, M Uder3, A Hartmann4, D L Wachter4, M W Beckmann1, K Heusinger1.   

Abstract

Purpose: Mammographic characteristics are known to be correlated to breast cancer risk. Percent mammographic density (PMD), as assessed by computer-assisted methods, is an established risk factor for breast cancer. Along with this assessment the absolute dense area (DA) of the breast is reported as well. Aim of this study was to assess the predictive value of DA concerning breast cancer risk in addition to other risk factors and in addition to PMD.
Methods: We conducted a case control study with hospital-based patients with a diagnosis of invasive breast cancer and healthy women as controls. A total of 561 patients and 376 controls with available mammographic density were included into this study. We describe the differences concerning the common risk factors BMI, parital status, use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and menopause between cases and controls and estimate the odds ratios for PMD and DA, adjusted for the mentioned risk factors. Furthermore we compare the prediction models with each other to find out whether the addition of DA improves the model.
Results: Mammographic density and DA were highly correlated with each other. Both variables were as well correlated to the commonly known risk factors with an expected direction and strength, however PMD (ρ = -0.56) was stronger correlated to BMI than DA (ρ = -0.11). The group of women within the highest quartil of PMD had an OR of 2.12 (95 % CI: 1.25-3.62). This could not be seen for the fourth quartile concerning DA. However the assessment of breast cancer risk could be improved by including DA in a prediction model in addition to common risk factors and PMD. Conclusions: The inclusion of the parameter DA into a prediction model for breast cancer in addition to established risk factors and PMD could improve the breast cancer risk assessment. As DA is measured together with PMD in the process of computer-assisted assessment of PMD it might be considered to include it as one additional breast cancer risk factor that is obtained from breast imaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; mammographic density; risk

Year:  2012        PMID: 25258465      PMCID: PMC4168400          DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1315129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd        ISSN: 0016-5751            Impact factor:   2.915


  45 in total

1.  A case-control study of mammographic densities in Hawaii.

Authors:  G Maskarinec; L Meng
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Body size, mammographic density, and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Lisa J Martin; Limei Sun; Helen Guo; Anna Chiarelli; Greg Hislop; Martin Yaffe; Salomon Minkin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Cumulative sum quality control for calibrated breast density measurements.

Authors:  John J Heine; Ke Cao; Craig Beam
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Family history, mammographic density, and risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Lisa J Martin; Olga Melnichouk; Helen Guo; Anna M Chiarelli; T Gregory Hislop; Martin J Yaffe; Salomon Minkin; John L Hopper; Norman F Boyd
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Mammographic density as a risk factor for breast cancer in a German case-control study.

Authors:  Katharina Heusinger; Christian R Loehberg; Lothar Haeberle; Sebastian M Jud; Peter Klingsiek; Alexander Hein; Christian M Bayer; Claudia Rauh; Michael Uder; Alexander Cavallaro; Matthias S May; Boris Adamietz; Ruediger Schulz-Wendtland; Thomas Wittenberg; Florian Wagner; Matthias W Beckmann; Peter A Fasching
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.497

6.  Reproducibility of visual assessment on mammographic density.

Authors:  Jinnan Gao; Ruth Warren; Helen Warren-Forward; John F Forbes
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-07-07       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Texture features from mammographic images and risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Armando Manduca; Michael J Carston; John J Heine; Christopher G Scott; V Shane Pankratz; Kathy R Brandt; Thomas A Sellers; Celine M Vachon; James R Cerhan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  11q13 is a susceptibility locus for hormone receptor positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Diether Lambrechts; Therese Truong; Christina Justenhoven; Manjeet K Humphreys; Jean Wang; John L Hopper; Gillian S Dite; Carmel Apicella; Melissa C Southey; Marjanka K Schmidt; Annegien Broeks; Sten Cornelissen; Richard van Hien; Elinor Sawyer; Ian Tomlinson; Michael Kerin; Nicola Miller; Roger L Milne; M Pilar Zamora; José Ignacio Arias Pérez; Javier Benítez; Ute Hamann; Yon-Dschun Ko; Thomas Brüning; Jenny Chang-Claude; Ursel Eilber; Rebecca Hein; Stefan Nickels; Dieter Flesch-Janys; Shan Wang-Gohrke; Esther M John; Alexander Miron; Robert Winqvist; Katri Pylkäs; Arja Jukkola-Vuorinen; Mervi Grip; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Jonathan Beesley; Xiaoqing Chen; Florence Menegaux; Emilie Cordina-Duverger; Chen-Yang Shen; Jyh-Cherng Yu; Pei-Ei Wu; Ming-Feng Hou; Irene L Andrulis; Teresa Selander; Gord Glendon; Anna Marie Mulligan; Hoda Anton-Culver; Argyrios Ziogas; Kenneth R Muir; Artitaya Lophatananon; Suthee Rattanamongkongul; Puttisak Puttawibul; Michael Jones; Nicholas Orr; Alan Ashworth; Anthony Swerdlow; Gianluca Severi; Laura Baglietto; Graham Giles; Melissa Southey; Federik Marmé; Andreas Schneeweiss; Christof Sohn; Barbara Burwinkel; Betul T Yesilyurt; Patrick Neven; Robert Paridaens; Hans Wildiers; Hermann Brenner; Heiko Müller; Volker Arndt; Christa Stegmaier; Alfons Meindl; Sarah Schott; Claus R Bartram; Rita K Schmutzler; Angela Cox; Ian W Brock; Graeme Elliott; Simon S Cross; Peter A Fasching; Ruediger Schulz-Wendtland; Arif B Ekici; Matthias W Beckmann; Olivia Fletcher; Nichola Johnson; Isabel Dos Santos Silva; Julian Peto; Heli Nevanlinna; Taru A Muranen; Kristiina Aittomäki; Carl Blomqvist; Thilo Dörk; Peter Schürmann; Michael Bremer; Peter Hillemanns; Natalia V Bogdanova; Natalia N Antonenkova; Yuri I Rogov; Johann H Karstens; Elza Khusnutdinova; Marina Bermisheva; Darya Prokofieva; Shamil Gancev; Anna Jakubowska; Jan Lubinski; Katarzyna Jaworska; Katarzyna Durda; Børge G Nordestgaard; Stig E Bojesen; Charlotte Lanng; Arto Mannermaa; Vesa Kataja; Veli-Matti Kosma; Jaana M Hartikainen; Paolo Radice; Paolo Peterlongo; Siranoush Manoukian; Loris Bernard; Fergus J Couch; Janet E Olson; Xianshu Wang; Zachary Fredericksen; Grethe Grenaker Alnaes; Vessela Kristensen; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Peter Devilee; Robert A E M Tollenaar; Caroline M Seynaeve; Maartje J Hooning; Montserrat García-Closas; Stephen J Chanock; Jolanta Lissowska; Mark E Sherman; Per Hall; Jianjun Liu; Kamila Czene; Daehee Kang; Keun-Young Yoo; Dong-Young Noh; Annika Lindblom; Sara Margolin; Alison M Dunning; Paul D P Pharoah; Douglas F Easton; Pascal Guénel; Hiltrud Brauch
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 4.878

9.  Prognostic value of a combined estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, Ki-67, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemical score and comparison with the Genomic Health recurrence score in early breast cancer.

Authors:  Jack Cuzick; Mitch Dowsett; Silvia Pineda; Christopher Wale; Janine Salter; Emma Quinn; Lila Zabaglo; Elizabeth Mallon; Andrew R Green; Ian O Ellis; Anthony Howell; Aman U Buzdar; John F Forbes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Risk of estrogen receptor-positive and -negative breast cancer and single-nucleotide polymorphism 2q35-rs13387042.

Authors:  Roger L Milne; Javier Benítez; Heli Nevanlinna; Tuomas Heikkinen; Kristiina Aittomäki; Carl Blomqvist; José Ignacio Arias; M Pilar Zamora; Barbara Burwinkel; Claus R Bartram; Alfons Meindl; Rita K Schmutzler; Angela Cox; Ian Brock; Graeme Elliott; Malcolm W R Reed; Melissa C Southey; Letitia Smith; Amanda B Spurdle; John L Hopper; Fergus J Couch; Janet E Olson; Xianshu Wang; Zachary Fredericksen; Peter Schürmann; Michael Bremer; Peter Hillemanns; Thilo Dörk; Peter Devilee; Christie J van Asperen; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Caroline Seynaeve; Per Hall; Kamila Czene; Jianjun Liu; Yuqing Li; Shahana Ahmed; Alison M Dunning; Melanie Maranian; Paul D P Pharoah; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Jonathan Beesley; Natalia V Bogdanova; Natalia N Antonenkova; Iosif V Zalutsky; Hoda Anton-Culver; Argyrios Ziogas; Hiltrud Brauch; Christina Justenhoven; Yon-Dschun Ko; Susanne Haas; Peter A Fasching; Reiner Strick; Arif B Ekici; Matthias W Beckmann; Graham G Giles; Gianluca Severi; Laura Baglietto; Dallas R English; Olivia Fletcher; Nichola Johnson; Isabel dos Santos Silva; Julian Peto; Clare Turnbull; Sarah Hines; Anthony Renwick; Nazneen Rahman; Børge G Nordestgaard; Stig E Bojesen; Henrik Flyger; Daehee Kang; Keun-Young Yoo; Dong-Young Noh; Arto Mannermaa; Vesa Kataja; Veli-Matti Kosma; Montserrat García-Closas; Stephen Chanock; Jolanta Lissowska; Louise A Brinton; Jenny Chang-Claude; Shan Wang-Gohrke; Chen-Yang Shen; Hui-Chun Wang; Jyh-Cherng Yu; Sou-Tong Chen; Marina Bermisheva; Tatjana Nikolaeva; Elza Khusnutdinova; Manjeet K Humphreys; Jonathan Morrison; Radka Platte; Douglas F Easton
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  A review of the influence of mammographic density on breast cancer clinical and pathological phenotype.

Authors:  Michael S Shawky; Cecilia W Huo; Kara Britt; Erik W Thompson; Michael A Henderson; Andrew Redfern
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Re-excision Rates and Local Recurrence in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Breast Conserving Therapy.

Authors:  M Dieterich; H Dieterich; H Moch; C Rosso
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  [Future of mammography-based imaging].

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; T Wittenberg; T Michel; A Hartmann; M W Beckmann; C Rauh; S M Jud; B Brehm; M Meier-Meitinger; G Anton; M Uder; P A Fasching
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Predicting Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Subtype Using Multiple Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms for Breast Cancer Risk and Several Variable Selection Methods.

Authors:  Lothar Häberle; Alexander Hein; Matthias Rübner; Michael Schneider; Arif B Ekici; Paul Gass; Arndt Hartmann; Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland; Matthias W Beckmann; Wing-Yee Lo; Werner Schroth; Hiltrud Brauch; Peter A Fasching; Marius Wunderle
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.915

5.  Mammographic Density Change and Risk of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Shadi Azam; Mikael Eriksson; Arvid Sjölander; Roxanna Hellgren; Marike Gabrielson; Kamila Czene; Per Hall
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  The contributions of breast density and common genetic variation to breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Celine M Vachon; V Shane Pankratz; Christopher G Scott; Lothar Haeberle; Elad Ziv; Matthew R Jensen; Kathleen R Brandt; Dana H Whaley; Janet E Olson; Katharina Heusinger; Carolin C Hack; Sebastian M Jud; Matthias W Beckmann; Ruediger Schulz-Wendtland; Jeffrey A Tice; Aaron D Norman; Julie M Cunningham; Kristen S Purrington; Douglas F Easton; Thomas A Sellers; Karla Kerlikowske; Peter A Fasching; Fergus J Couch
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Mammographic Density and Prediction of Nodal Status in Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  C C Hack; L Häberle; K Geisler; R Schulz-Wendtland; A Hartmann; P A Fasching; M Uder; D L Wachter; S M Jud; C R Loehberg; M P Lux; C Rauh; M W Beckmann; K Heusinger
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.915

8.  Influence of Family History of Breast or Ovarian Cancer on Pathological Complete Response and Long-Term Prognosis in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Marius Wunderle; Lothar Häberle; Alexander Hein; Sebastian M Jud; Michael P Lux; Carolin C Hack; Julius Emons; Felix Heindl; Naiba Nabieva; Christian R Loehberg; Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland; Arndt Hartmann; Matthias W Beckmann; Peter A Fasching; Paul Gass
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.268

9.  Polymorphisms in the RANK/RANKL genes and their effect on bone specific prognosis in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Alexander Hein; Christian M Bayer; Michael G Schrauder; Lothar Häberle; Katharina Heusinger; Reiner Strick; Matthias Ruebner; Michael P Lux; Stefan P Renner; Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland; Arif B Ekici; Arndt Hartmann; Matthias W Beckmann; Peter A Fasching
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  Current strategies for the prevention of breast cancer.

Authors:  Pooja Advani; Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2014-05-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.