Literature DB >> 19910029

Hypereosinophilic syndrome: a multicenter, retrospective analysis of clinical characteristics and response to therapy.

Princess U Ogbogu1, Bruce S Bochner, Joseph H Butterfield, Gerald J Gleich, Johannes Huss-Marp, Jean Emmanuel Kahn, Kristin M Leiferman, Thomas B Nutman, Florian Pfab, Johannes Ring, Marc E Rothenberg, Florence Roufosse, Marie-Helene Sajous, Javed Sheikh, Dagmar Simon, Hans-Uwe Simon, Miguel L Stein, Andrew Wardlaw, Peter F Weller, Amy D Klion.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) is a heterogeneous group of rare disorders defined by persistent blood eosinophilia > or =1.5 x 10(9)/L, absence of a secondary cause, and evidence of eosinophil-associated pathology. With the exception of a recent multicenter trial of mepolizumab (anti-IL-5 mAb), published therapeutic experience has been restricted to case reports and small case series.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to collect and summarize baseline demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics in a large, diverse cohort of patients with HES and to review responses to treatment with conventional and novel therapies.
METHODS: Clinical and laboratory data from 188 patients with HES, seen between January 2001 and December 2006 at 11 institutions in the United States and Europe, were collected retrospectively by chart review.
RESULTS: Eighteen of 161 patients (11%) tested were Fip1-like 1-platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (FIP1L1-PDGFRA) mutation-positive, and 29 of 168 patients tested (17%) had a demonstrable aberrant or clonal T-cell population. Corticosteroid monotherapy induced complete or partial responses at 1 month in 85% (120/141) of patients with most remaining on maintenance doses (median, 10 mg prednisone equivalent daily for 2 months to 20 years). Hydroxyurea and IFN-alpha (used in 64 and 46 patients, respectively) were also effective, but their use was limited by toxicity. Imatinib (used in 68 patients) was more effective in patients with the FIP1L1-PDGFRA mutation (88%) than in those without (23%; P < .001).
CONCLUSION: This study, the largest clinical analysis of patients with HES to date, not only provides useful information for clinicians but also should stimulate prospective trials to optimize treatment of HES.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19910029      PMCID: PMC2829669          DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.09.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol        ISSN: 0091-6749            Impact factor:   10.793


  17 in total

1.  Elevated serum tryptase levels identify a subset of patients with a myeloproliferative variant of idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome associated with tissue fibrosis, poor prognosis, and imatinib responsiveness.

Authors:  Amy D Klion; Pierre Noel; Cem Akin; Melissa A Law; D Gary Gilliland; Jan Cools; Dean D Metcalfe; Thomas B Nutman
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2003-04-03       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 2.  The hypereosinophilic syndrome: analysis of fourteen cases with review of the literature.

Authors:  M J Chusid; D C Dale; B C West; S M Wolff
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  Molecular characterization of the idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) in 35 French patients with normal conventional cytogenetics.

Authors:  C Roche-Lestienne; S Lepers; V Soenen-Cornu; J-E Kahn; J-L Laï; E Hachulla; F Drupt; A-L Demarty; A-S Roumier; M Gardembas; M Dib; N Philippe; N Cambier; S Barete; C Libersa; O Bletry; P-Y Hatron; B Quesnel; C Rose; K Maloum; O Blanchet; P Fenaux; L Prin; C Preudhomme
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 4.  The idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome.

Authors:  P F Weller; G J Bubley
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1994-05-15       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  A tyrosine kinase created by fusion of the PDGFRA and FIP1L1 genes as a therapeutic target of imatinib in idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome.

Authors:  Jan Cools; Daniel J DeAngelo; Jason Gotlib; Elizabeth H Stover; Robert D Legare; Jorges Cortes; Jeffrey Kutok; Jennifer Clark; Ilene Galinsky; James D Griffin; Nicholas C P Cross; Ayalew Tefferi; James Malone; Rafeul Alam; Stanley L Schrier; Janet Schmid; Michal Rose; Peter Vandenberghe; Gregor Verhoef; Marc Boogaerts; Iwona Wlodarska; Hagop Kantarjian; Peter Marynen; Steven E Coutre; Richard Stone; D Gary Gilliland
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-03-27       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Abnormal clones of T cells producing interleukin-5 in idiopathic eosinophilia.

Authors:  H U Simon; S G Plötz; R Dummer; K Blaser
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-10-07       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Safety and efficacy of the monoclonal anti-interleukin-5 antibody SCH55700 in the treatment of patients with hypereosinophilic syndrome.

Authors:  Amy D Klion; Melissa A Law; Pierre Noel; Yae-Jean Kim; Thomas P Haverty; Thomas B Nutman
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2003-12-24       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  High serum thymus and activation-regulated chemokine levels in the lymphocytic variant of the hypereosinophilic syndrome.

Authors:  Aurore de Lavareille; Florence Roufosse; Peter Schmid-Grendelmeier; Anne-Sophie Roumier; L Schandené; Elie Cogan; Hans-Uwe Simon; Michel Goldman
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 10.793

9.  Response to corticosteroids in the hypereosinophilic syndrome. Association with increased serum IgE levels.

Authors:  R K Bush; M Geller; W W Busse; D K Flaherty; H A Dickie
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1978-08

10.  FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion: prevalence and clinicopathologic correlates in 89 consecutive patients with moderate to severe eosinophilia.

Authors:  Animesh Pardanani; Stephanie R Brockman; Sarah F Paternoster; Heather C Flynn; Rhett P Ketterling; Terra L Lasho; Ching-Liang Ho; Chin-Yang Li; Gordon W Dewald; Ayalew Tefferi
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 22.113

View more
  138 in total

Review 1.  How to Assess, Control, and Manage Uncontrolled CRS/Nasal Polyp Patients.

Authors:  Rahuram Sivasubramaniam; Richard J Harvey
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 2.  Practical approach to the patient with hypereosinophilia.

Authors:  Florence Roufosse; Peter F Weller
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 10.793

Review 3.  Approach to patients with eosinophilia.

Authors:  Lanny J Rosenwasser
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct

Review 4.  Eosinophilic myeloproliferative disorders.

Authors:  Amy D Klion
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2011

5.  Biomarkers of eosinophil involvement in allergic and eosinophilic diseases: review of phenotypic and serum markers including a novel assay to quantify levels of soluble Siglec-8.

Authors:  Ho Jeong Na; Robert G Hamilton; Amy D Klion; Bruce S Bochner
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.303

6.  A Case of Erythroderma Secondary to Hypereosinophilia.

Authors:  Mohammed Shafi Abdulsalam; Hari Chandana Ghanta; Prabu Pandurangan; Maya Menon; Sheba S K Jacob
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-05-01

Review 7.  Eosinophilic pneumonias.

Authors:  Praveen Akuthota; Peter F Weller
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  Unravelling the NERDS syndrome.

Authors:  Achintya Dinesh Singh; Tejas Menon Suri; Rakesh Kumar Jagdish; Uma Kumar
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2018-05-12

9.  Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of High-Dose Mepolizumab Treatment for Hypereosinophilic Syndrome.

Authors:  Fei Li Kuang; Michael P Fay; JeanAnne Ware; Lauren Wetzler; Nicole Holland-Thomas; Thomas Brown; Hector Ortega; Jonathan Steinfeld; Paneez Khoury; Amy D Klion
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2018-05-08

10.  Eosinophilic gastroenteritis and related eosinophilic disorders.

Authors:  Calman Prussin
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.806

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.