Fei Li Kuang1, Michael P Fay2, JeanAnne Ware3, Lauren Wetzler3, Nicole Holland-Thomas4, Thomas Brown3, Hector Ortega5, Jonathan Steinfeld6, Paneez Khoury3, Amy D Klion3. 1. Human Eosinophil Section, LPD, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, Md. Electronic address: feili.kuang@nih.gov. 2. Biostatistics Research Branch, DCR, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, Md. 3. Human Eosinophil Section, LPD, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, Md. 4. Clinical Research Directorate/Clinical Monitoring Research Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research sponsored by the National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Md. 5. Respiratory, US Medical Affairs, GlaxoSmithKline, La Jolla, Calif. 6. Respiratory Therapy Area Unit and Flexible Discovery Unit, GlaxoSmithKline, Philadelphia, Pa.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Conventional therapies for hypereosinophilic syndromes (HES) have variable efficacy and carry significant long-term toxicities. Anti-IL-5 (mepolizumab) therapy has a glucocorticoid (GC)-sparing effect in GC-sensitive HES, but the efficacy of mepolizumab in treatment-refractory HES patients with severe disease has not been examined to date. OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of response to mepolizumab in subjects with severe treatment-refractory HES and compare long-term outcomes in these subjects with HES subjects treated with conventional therapies. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of clinical and laboratory data from 35 HES subjects treated with mepolizumab and 55 HES subjects on conventional therapy, all followed at a single center, was performed. RESULTS: Peak eosinophilia, GC sensitivity, pulmonary involvement, HES clinical subtype, and pretreatment serum IL-5 were correlated with mepolizumab response. Despite evidence of more severe disease at baseline, mepolizumab-treated subjects had comparable long-term clinical outcomes to HES subjects treated with conventional therapies and reported improvements in therapy-related comorbidities. Subjects managed with mepolizumab monotherapy had fewer disease flares than HES subjects on conventional therapies or mepolizumab-treated HES subjects requiring additional HES therapies. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that mepolizumab is an effective and well-tolerated therapy for HES, but suggests that response is more likely in GC-responsive subjects with idiopathic or overlap forms of HES. A primary benefit of treatment is the reduction of comorbidity due to discontinuation or the reduction of conventional HES therapies. Although subjects who completely discontinued GC had the most benefit, high-dose mepolizumab was a safe and effective salvage therapy for severe, treatment-refractory HES. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND: Conventional therapies for hypereosinophilic syndromes (HES) have variable efficacy and carry significant long-term toxicities. Anti-IL-5 (mepolizumab) therapy has a glucocorticoid (GC)-sparing effect in GC-sensitive HES, but the efficacy of mepolizumab in treatment-refractory HES patients with severe disease has not been examined to date. OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of response to mepolizumab in subjects with severe treatment-refractory HES and compare long-term outcomes in these subjects with HES subjects treated with conventional therapies. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of clinical and laboratory data from 35 HES subjects treated with mepolizumab and 55 HES subjects on conventional therapy, all followed at a single center, was performed. RESULTS: Peak eosinophilia, GC sensitivity, pulmonary involvement, HES clinical subtype, and pretreatment serum IL-5 were correlated with mepolizumab response. Despite evidence of more severe disease at baseline, mepolizumab-treated subjects had comparable long-term clinical outcomes to HES subjects treated with conventional therapies and reported improvements in therapy-related comorbidities. Subjects managed with mepolizumab monotherapy had fewer disease flares than HES subjects on conventional therapies or mepolizumab-treated HES subjects requiring additional HES therapies. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that mepolizumab is an effective and well-tolerated therapy for HES, but suggests that response is more likely in GC-responsive subjects with idiopathic or overlap forms of HES. A primary benefit of treatment is the reduction of comorbidity due to discontinuation or the reduction of conventional HES therapies. Although subjects who completely discontinued GC had the most benefit, high-dose mepolizumab was a safe and effective salvage therapy for severe, treatment-refractory HES. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Miguel L Stein; Margaret H Collins; Joyce M Villanueva; Jonathan P Kushner; Philip E Putnam; Bridget K Buckmeier; Alexandra H Filipovich; Amal H Assa'ad; Marc E Rothenberg Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2006-11-07 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Michael E Wechsler; Praveen Akuthota; David Jayne; Paneez Khoury; Amy Klion; Carol A Langford; Peter A Merkel; Frank Moosig; Ulrich Specks; Maria C Cid; Raashid Luqmani; Judith Brown; Stephen Mallett; Richard Philipson; Steve W Yancey; Jonathan Steinfeld; Peter F Weller; Gerald J Gleich Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-05-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Marc E Rothenberg; Amy D Klion; Florence E Roufosse; Jean Emmanuel Kahn; Peter F Weller; Hans-Uwe Simon; Lawrence B Schwartz; Lanny J Rosenwasser; Johannes Ring; Elaine F Griffin; Ann E Haig; Paul I H Frewer; Jacqueline M Parkin; Gerald J Gleich Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-03-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ian D Pavord; Pascal Chanez; Gerard J Criner; Huib A M Kerstjens; Stephanie Korn; Njira Lugogo; Jean-Benoit Martinot; Hironori Sagara; Frank C Albers; Eric S Bradford; Stephanie S Harris; Bhabita Mayer; David B Rubin; Steven W Yancey; Frank C Sciurba Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-09-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jennifer K Garrett; Sean C Jameson; Blythe Thomson; Margaret H Collins; Lynne E Wagoner; Debbie K Freese; Lisa A Beck; Joshua A Boyce; Alexandra H Filipovich; Joyce M Villanueva; Steven A Sutton; Amal H Assa'ad; Marc E Rothenberg Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2003-12-12 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Kathleen R Bartemes; Koji Iijima; Takao Kobayashi; Gail M Kephart; Andrew N McKenzie; Hirohito Kita Journal: J Immunol Date: 2011-12-23 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Ian D Pavord; Stephanie Korn; Peter Howarth; Eugene R Bleecker; Roland Buhl; Oliver N Keene; Hector Ortega; Pascal Chanez Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-08-18 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Dara Burris; Chen E Rosenberg; Justin T Schwartz; Yin Zhang; Michael D Eby; J Pablo Abonia; Patricia C Fulkerson Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract Date: 2019-05-22
Authors: Michael M Chen; Florence Roufosse; Sa A Wang; Srdan Verstovsek; Sandy R Durrani; Marc E Rothenberg; Thanai Pongdee; Joseph Butterfield; Timothy Lax; Michael E Wechsler; Miguel L Stein; Princess U Ogbogu; Basil M Kahwash; Sameer K Mathur; Dagmar Simon; Praveen Akuthota; Nicole Holland; Lauren Wetzler; JeanAnne M Ware; Canting Guo; Michael P Fay; Paneez Khoury; Amy D Klion; Bruce S Bochner Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract Date: 2022-02-15
Authors: Elizabeth A Jacobsen; David J Jackson; Enrico Heffler; Sameer K Mathur; Albert J Bredenoord; Ian D Pavord; Praveen Akuthota; Florence Roufosse; Marc E Rothenberg Journal: Annu Rev Immunol Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 28.527