Literature DB >> 19909741

Optimal parameters of transcorneal electrical stimulation (TES) to be neuroprotective of axotomized RGCs in adult rats.

Takeshi Morimoto1, Tomomitsu Miyoshi, Hajime Sawai, Takashi Fujikado.   

Abstract

We previously showed that transcorneal electrical stimulation (TES) promoted the survival of axotomized retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) of rats. However the relationship between the parameters of TES and the neuroprotective effect of TES on axotomized RGCs was unclear. In the present study, we determined whether the neuroprotective effect of TES is affected by the parameters of TES. Adult male Wistar rats received TES just after transection of the left optic nerve (ON). The pulse duration, current intensity, frequency, waveform, and numbers of sessions of the TES were changed systematically. The alterations of the retina were examined histologically seven days or fourteen days after the ON transection. The optimal neuroprotective parameters were pulse duration of 1 and 2 ms/phase (P < 0.001, each), current intensity of 100 and 200 muA (P < 0.05, each), and stimulation frequency of 1, 5, and 20 Hz (P < 0.001, respectively). More than 30 min of TES was necessary to have a neuroprotective effect (P < 0.001). Symmetric pulses without an inter-pulse interval were most effective (P < 0.001). Repeated TES was more neuroprotective than a single TES at 14 days after ON transection (P < 0.001). Our results indicate that there is a range of optimal neuroprotective parameters of TES for axotomized RGCs of rats. These values will provide a guideline for the use of TES in patients with different retinal and optic nerve diseases. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19909741     DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2009.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Eye Res        ISSN: 0014-4835            Impact factor:   3.467


  23 in total

1.  Electrical stimulation--a therapeutic strategy for retinal and optic nerve disease?

Authors:  Florian Gekeler; Karl Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Effects of steroid administration and transcorneal electrical stimulation on the anatomic and electrophysiologic deterioration of nonarteritic ischemic optic neuropathy in a rodent model.

Authors:  Takako Osako; Hideki Chuman; Tomoyuki Maekubo; Michitaka Ishiai; Naoko Kawano; Nobuhisa Nao-I
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 3.  Electrical Stimulation as a Means for Improving Vision.

Authors:  Amer Sehic; Shuai Guo; Kin-Sang Cho; Rima M Corraya; Dong F Chen; Tor P Utheim
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.307

4.  Retinal neurovascular responses to transcorneal electrical stimulation measured with optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Xiaofan Su; Hao Zheng; Qian Li; Pengcheng Sun; Meixuan Zhou; Heng Li; Jiahui Guo; Xinyu Chai; Chuanqing Zhou
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2020-01-20

5.  Age-dependent differences in recovered visual responses in Royal College of Surgeons rats transduced with the Channelrhodopsin-2 gene.

Authors:  Hitomi Isago; Eriko Sugano; Zhuo Wang; Namie Murayama; Eri Koyanagi; Makoto Tamai; Hiroshi Tomita
Journal:  J Mol Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.444

6.  Effects of subretinal electrical stimulation in mer-KO mice.

Authors:  Julie A Mocko; Moon Kim; Amanda E Faulkner; Yang Cao; Vincent T Ciavatta; Machelle T Pardue
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 7.  The role of electrical stimulation therapy in ophthalmic diseases.

Authors:  Lin Fu; Amy Cheuk Yin Lo; Jimmy Shiu Ming Lai; Kendrick Co Shih
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  [Transcorneal electrostimulation].

Authors:  F Gekeler
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.059

9.  Improvement of visual acuity after transcorneal electrical stimulation in case of Best vitelliform macular dystrophy.

Authors:  Naoki Ozeki; Kei Shinoda; Hisao Ohde; Susumu Ishida; Kazuo Tsubota
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 10.  Neuroprotective strategies for retinal disease.

Authors:  Machelle T Pardue; Rachael S Allen
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 21.198

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.