INTRODUCTION: Electrical stimulation therapy (EST) involves the use of a low-intensity electrical current in the treatment of neuromuscular conditions. During the recent two decades, EST has emerged as a potential neuroprotective strategy in certain ophthalmic diseases, aided by a lack of effective management for these conditions. PURPOSE: The aim of this review is to summarize and discuss current available evidence for the use of EST in ophthalmic diseases in the laboratory setting and in human trials. METHODS: The compilation and review of published English-language reports on the use of EST in human ophthalmic disease and animal models of ophthalmic disease. RESULTS: From published reports, research work on the use of EST in ophthalmic diseases began in the last 20 years. Different methods of electrical stimulation have been devised, with varying levels of invasiveness. Results from human trials have favored earlier and repeated treatment after insults to the optic nerve, while EST has shown transient effectiveness in degenerative diseases of photoreceptors. Patients also reported no serious adverse effects from EST in the clinical trials. Results from animal studies have further confirmed survival benefits of EST in retinal cell survival, with the underlying mechanism likely multifactorial, but involving Müller cell modulation. CONCLUSIONS: Results from human and animal studies have demonstrated the relevance and potential effectiveness of EST in ophthalmic disease. However, optimal disease and species-specific stimulation settings need to be defined.
INTRODUCTION: Electrical stimulation therapy (EST) involves the use of a low-intensity electrical current in the treatment of neuromuscular conditions. During the recent two decades, EST has emerged as a potential neuroprotective strategy in certain ophthalmic diseases, aided by a lack of effective management for these conditions. PURPOSE: The aim of this review is to summarize and discuss current available evidence for the use of EST in ophthalmic diseases in the laboratory setting and in human trials. METHODS: The compilation and review of published English-language reports on the use of EST in humanophthalmic disease and animal models of ophthalmic disease. RESULTS: From published reports, research work on the use of EST in ophthalmic diseases began in the last 20 years. Different methods of electrical stimulation have been devised, with varying levels of invasiveness. Results from human trials have favored earlier and repeated treatment after insults to the optic nerve, while EST has shown transient effectiveness in degenerative diseases of photoreceptors. Patients also reported no serious adverse effects from EST in the clinical trials. Results from animal studies have further confirmed survival benefits of EST in retinal cell survival, with the underlying mechanism likely multifactorial, but involving Müller cell modulation. CONCLUSIONS: Results from human and animal studies have demonstrated the relevance and potential effectiveness of EST in ophthalmic disease. However, optimal disease and species-specific stimulation settings need to be defined.
Authors: M C Rodriguez-Oroz; J A Obeso; A E Lang; J-L Houeto; P Pollak; S Rehncrona; J Kulisevsky; A Albanese; J Volkmann; M I Hariz; N P Quinn; J D Speelman; J Guridi; I Zamarbide; A Gironell; J Molet; B Pascual-Sedano; B Pidoux; A M Bonnet; Y Agid; J Xie; A-L Benabid; A M Lozano; J Saint-Cyr; L Romito; M F Contarino; M Scerrati; V Fraix; N Van Blercom Journal: Brain Date: 2005-06-23 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: P M D'Cruz; D Yasumura; J Weir; M T Matthes; H Abderrahim; M M LaVail; D Vollrath Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2000-03-01 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: A Antal; I Alekseichuk; M Bikson; J Brockmöller; A R Brunoni; R Chen; L G Cohen; G Dowthwaite; J Ellrich; A Flöel; F Fregni; M S George; R Hamilton; J Haueisen; C S Herrmann; F C Hummel; J P Lefaucheur; D Liebetanz; C K Loo; C D McCaig; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; V Moliadze; M A Nitsche; R Nowak; F Padberg; A Pascual-Leone; W Poppendieck; A Priori; S Rossi; P M Rossini; J Rothwell; M A Rueger; G Ruffini; K Schellhorn; H R Siebner; Y Ugawa; A Wexler; U Ziemann; M Hallett; W Paulus Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2017-06-19 Impact factor: 3.708
Authors: Maria Della Volpe-Waizel; Hanna Camenzind Zuche; Ursula Müller; Annekatrin Rickmann; Hendrik P N Scholl; Margarita G Todorova Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2019-11-12 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Thomas Josef Dauben; Josefin Ziebart; Thomas Bender; Sarah Zaatreh; Bernd Kreikemeyer; Rainer Bader Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2016-12-04 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Siegfried K Wagner; Jasleen K Jolly; Maria Pefkianaki; Florian Gekeler; Andrew R Webster; Susan M Downes; Robert E Maclaren Journal: BMJ Open Ophthalmol Date: 2017-12-14
Authors: Jung-Hwan A Lim; Benjamin K Stafford; Phong L Nguyen; Brian V Lien; Chen Wang; Katherine Zukor; Zhigang He; Andrew D Huberman Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 2016-07-11 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: Lin Fu; Frederic K Fung; Amy Cheuk-Yin Lo; Yau-Kei Chan; Kwok-Fai So; Ian Yat-Hin Wong; Kendrick Co Shih; Jimmy Shiu-Ming Lai Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2018-05-29 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Lin Fu; Sum Sum Kwok; Yau Kei Chan; Jimmy Shiu Ming Lai; Weihua Pan; Li Nie; Kendrick Co Shih Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2019-11-11 Impact factor: 3.411