Literature DB >> 19908345

Radical resection and outcome for malignant tumors of the pancreatic body and tail.

Shao-Liang Han1, Wei-Jian Zhang, Xiao-Feng Zheng, Xian Shen, Qi-Qiang Zeng, Qing-Hong Ke.   

Abstract

AIM: To analyze the factors influencing radical (R0) resection rate and surgical outcome for malignant tumor of the pancreatic body and tail.
METHODS: The clinical and operative data and follow-up results of 214 pancreatic body and tail cancer patients were analyzed retrospectively.
RESULTS: One hundred and twenty/214 pancreatic body and tail cancer patients underwent surgical treatment; the overall resection rate was 59.2% (71/120), and the R0 resection rate was 40.8% (49/120). Compared with non-R0 treatment, the patients receiving an R0 resection had smaller size tumor (P<0.01), cystadenocarcinoma (P<0.01), less lymph node metastasis (P<0.01), less peri-pancreatic organ involvement (P<0.01) and earlier stage disease (P<0.01). The overall 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates for pancreatic body and tail cancer patients were 12.7% (25/197), 7.6% (15/197) and 2.5% (5/197), respectively, and ductal adenocarcinoma patients had worse survival rates [15.0% (9/60), 6.7% (4/60) and 1.7% (1/60), respectively] than cystadenocarcinoma patients [53.8% (21/39), 28.2% (11/39) and 10.3% (4/39)] (P<0.01). Moreover, the 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates in patients with R0 resection were 55.3% (26/47), 31.9% (15/47) and 10.6% (5/47), respectively, significantly better than those in patients with palliative resection [9.5% (2/21), 0 and 0] and in patients with bypass or laparotomy [1.2% (1/81), 0 and 0] (P<0.01).
CONCLUSION: Early diagnosis is crucial for increasing the radical resection rate, and radical resection plays an important role in improving survival for pancreatic body and tail cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19908345      PMCID: PMC2776864          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.15.5346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  27 in total

1.  Value of splenic preservation during distal pancreatectomy for chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  S A White; C D Sutton; D P Berry; A R Dennison
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  [Surgical therapy of tumor of body and tail of pancreas: report of 117 cases].

Authors:  Qian Liu; Ping Zhao; Cheng-feng Wang; Jian-qiang Cai; Yong-fu Shao; Xiao-feng Bai
Journal:  Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2006-03-01

3.  One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies.

Authors:  John L Cameron; Taylor S Riall; JoAnn Coleman; Kenneth A Belcher
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  [Prospective evaluation of ultrasonography, multi-slice spiral CT, endoscopic ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of TNM staging and assessment of resectability in pancreatic carcinoma].

Authors:  Yan-tao Tian; Cheng-feng Wang; Yi Shan; Dong-bing Zhao; Gui-qi Wang; Xin-ming Zhao; Han Ouyang; Yu-zhi Hao; Yue-min Sun; Hui Qu; Ping Zhao
Journal:  Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2008-11-04

5.  Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization.

Authors:  J H Balcom; D W Rattner; A L Warshaw; Y Chang; C Fernandez-del Castillo
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-04

6.  Distal pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes in 235 patients.

Authors:  K D Lillemoe; S Kaushal; J L Cameron; T A Sohn; H A Pitt; C J Yeo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Is there a role for staging laparoscopy in patients with locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma?

Authors:  Margo Shoup; Corinne Winston; Murray F Brennan; Diane Bassman; Kevin C Conlon
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Prognostic factors following curative resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a population-based, linked database analysis of 396 patients.

Authors:  Jonathan E Lim; Michael W Chien; Craig C Earle
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma by imaging studies.

Authors:  Jimmie C Wong; David S K Lu
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 11.382

10.  Periampullary adenocarcinoma: analysis of 5-year survivors.

Authors:  C J Yeo; T A Sohn; J L Cameron; R H Hruban; K D Lillemoe; H A Pitt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  6 in total

1.  Effects of a histone deacetylase inhibitor, sodium butyrate, on 53-kDa protein expression and sensitivity to anticancer drugs of pancreatic cancer cells.

Authors:  Masaki Kitazono; Hiroyuki Shinchi; Sumiya Ishigami; Shinichi Ueno; Shoji Natsugoe
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2010-06

Review 2.  Pleiotrophin promotes perineural invasion in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Jun Yao; Xiu-Feng Hu; Xiao-Shan Feng; She-Gan Gao
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Contour variations of the body and tail of the pancreas: evaluation with MDCT.

Authors:  Ahmad Khalid Omeri; Shunro Matsumoto; Maki Kiyonaga; Ryo Takaji; Yasunari Yamada; Kazuhisa Kosen; Hiromu Mori; Hidetoshi Miyake
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  Long-term results and prognostic factors in resected pancreatic body and tail adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Vinayak S Rohan; Jun-Te Hsu; Keng-Hao Liu; Chun-Nan Yeh; Ta-Sen Yeh; Yi-Yin Jan; Tsann-Long Hwang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2013-03

5.  The advances of Midkine with peripheral invasion in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Jun Yao; Wen-Yao Li; She-Gan Gao
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 6.166

6.  Radical resection and enucleation in Chinese adolescents with pancreatic tumors: A 15-year case series.

Authors:  Lie Yao; Zhi-Bo Xie; Chen Jin; Yong-Jian Jiang; Ji Li; Feng Yang; Quan-Jun Lin; De-Liang Fu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.889

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.