Literature DB >> 18948228

Staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma by imaging studies.

Jimmie C Wong1, David S K Lu.   

Abstract

Imaging studies play a crucial role in the diagnosis and management of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Computed tomography (CT) is the most widely available and best-validated modality for imaging patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. To maximize the diagnostic efficacy of CT, use of a pancreas protocol is mandatory. The sensitivity of CT for diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (89%-97%) and its positive predictive value for predicting unresectability (89%-100%) are high. The positive predictive value of CT for predicting resectability (45%-79%) is low because the diagnostic criteria for diagnosing vascular invasion by tumor favors specificity over sensitivity to avoid denying surgery to patients with potentially resectable tumor. Furthermore, the sensitivity of CT for small hepatic and peritoneal metastases is limited. Magnetic resonance imaging has not been shown to perform better than CT for the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, but can be helpful as an adjunct to CT, particularly for evaluation of small hepatic lesions that cannot be fully characterized by CT. Ultrasound is often the first study obtained in patients with obstructive jaundice or unexplained abdominal pain, but its utility for diagnosis and staging of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma is limited. Positron emission tomography/CT combines the functional information provided by positron emission tomography with the anatomic information provided by CT and is a promising modality for imaging of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, but its utility has not been established. Endoscopic ultrasound is generally considered superior to CT for the diagnosis and local staging of pancreatic cancer, but is limited by availability and inability to assess for distant metastases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18948228     DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.09.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  38 in total

1.  An MRI-driven practice: a new perspective on MRI for the evaluation of adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas.

Authors:  Elliot B Tapper; Diego Martin; N Volkan Adsay; David Kooby; Bobby Kalb; Juan M Sarmiento
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Margaret A Tempero; J Pablo Arnoletti; Stephen Behrman; Edgar Ben-Josef; Al B Benson; Jordan D Berlin; John L Cameron; Ephraim S Casper; Steven J Cohen; Michelle Duff; Joshua D I Ellenhorn; William G Hawkins; John P Hoffman; Boris W Kuvshinoff; Mokenge P Malafa; Peter Muscarella; Eric K Nakakura; Aaron R Sasson; Sarah P Thayer; Douglas S Tyler; Robert S Warren; Samuel Whiting; Christopher Willett; Robert A Wolff
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 3.  Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: definitions and management.

Authors:  Nicole E Lopez; Cristina Prendergast; Andrew M Lowy
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Intraoperative ultrasound with contrast medium in resective pancreatic surgery: a pilot study.

Authors:  Antonino Spinelli; Daniele Del Fabbro; Matteo Sacchi; Alessandro Zerbi; Guido Torzilli; Fabio R Lutman; Luigi Laghi; Alberto Malesci; Marco Montorsi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Management of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Amit Mahipal; Jessica Frakes; Sarah Hoffe; Richard Kim
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-10-15

Review 6.  Pancreatic cancer: diagnosis and treatments.

Authors:  Hong-Yu Li; Zhong-Min Cui; Jiang Chen; Xiao-Zhong Guo; Ying-Yi Li
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-02-14

Review 7.  A Multidisciplinary Approach to Pancreas Cancer in 2016: A Review.

Authors:  Evan L Fogel; Safi Shahda; Kumar Sandrasegaran; John DeWitt; Jeffrey J Easler; David M Agarwal; Mackenzie Eagleson; Nicholas J Zyromski; Michael G House; Susannah Ellsworth; Ihab El Hajj; Bert H O'Neil; Attila Nakeeb; Stuart Sherman
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Accuracy of differential diagnosis for pancreatic cancer is improved in the combination of RCAS1 and CEA measurements and cytology in pancreatic juice.

Authors:  Yoshiki Naito; Yoshinobu Okabe; Masakatsu Nagayama; Takuya Nishinakagawa; Tomoki Taira; Akihiko Kawahara; Satoshi Hattori; Kazuyuki Machida; Yusuke Ishida; Ryohei Kaji; Kazuhiro Mikagi; Hisafumi Kinoshita; Makiko Yasumoto; Jun Akiba; Masayoshi Kage; Manabu Nakashima; Koichi Ohshima; Hirohisa Yano
Journal:  Med Mol Morphol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 2.309

9.  Radical resection and outcome for malignant tumors of the pancreatic body and tail.

Authors:  Shao-Liang Han; Wei-Jian Zhang; Xiao-Feng Zheng; Xian Shen; Qi-Qiang Zeng; Qing-Hong Ke
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Pancreatic adenocarcinoma in a patient with situs inversus: a case report of this rare coincidence.

Authors:  Eric L Sceusi; Curtis J Wray
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.