Literature DB >> 17620928

Central contributions to contractions evoked by tetanic neuromuscular electrical stimulation.

David F Collins1.   

Abstract

Tetanic electrical stimulation applied over human muscle or peripheral nerve generates contractions by depolarizing motor axons beneath the stimulating electrodes. However, the simultaneous depolarization of sensory axons can also contribute to the contractions by the synaptic recruitment of spinal motoneurons. Maximizing this central contribution may be beneficial for reducing muscle atrophy or restoring movement for persons with movement disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17620928     DOI: 10.1097/jes.0b013e3180a0321b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev        ISSN: 0091-6331            Impact factor:   6.230


  51 in total

1.  The effects of wide pulse neuromuscular electrical stimulation on elbow flexion torque in individuals with chronic hemiparetic stroke.

Authors:  J M Clair-Auger; D F Collins; J P A Dewald
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 2.  Physiological and methodological considerations for the use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Nicola A Maffiuletti
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  Effects of Use and Disuse on Non-paralyzed and Paralyzed Skeletal Muscles.

Authors:  David R Dolbow; Ashraf S Gorgey
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2016-01-02       Impact factor: 6.745

4.  Extra forces evoked during electrical stimulation of the muscle or its nerve are generated and modulated by a length-dependent intrinsic property of muscle in humans and cats.

Authors:  Alain Frigon; Christopher K Thompson; Michael D Johnson; Marin Manuel; T George Hornby; C J Heckman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Models of passive and active dendrite motoneuron pools and their differences in muscle force control.

Authors:  Leonardo Abdala Elias; Vitor Martins Chaud; André Fabio Kohn
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-06       Impact factor: 1.621

6.  Effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation intensity over the tibial nerve trunk on triceps surae muscle fatigue.

Authors:  Aude-Clémence M Doix; Boris Matkowski; Alain Martin; Karin Roeleveld; Serge S Colson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Caution is required when comparing the effectiveness of voluntary versus stimulated versus combined strength training modalities.

Authors:  Nicola A Maffiuletti
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Less indication of muscle damage in the second than initial electrical muscle stimulation bout consisting of isometric contractions of the knee extensors.

Authors:  Abdulaziz Aldayel; Marc Jubeau; Michael R McGuigan; Kazunori Nosaka
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 9.  Do metabolites that are produced during resistance exercise enhance muscle hypertrophy?

Authors:  Scott J Dankel; Kevin T Mattocks; Matthew B Jessee; Samuel L Buckner; J Grant Mouser; Jeremy P Loenneke
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  High-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation modulates interhemispheric inhibition in healthy humans.

Authors:  Nicolas Gueugneau; Sidney Grosprêtre; Paul Stapley; Romuald Lepers
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.