Literature DB >> 19903750

Evolving views of DNA replication (in)fidelity.

T A Kunkel1.   

Abstract

"It has not escaped our notice that the specific pairing we have postulated immediately suggests a possible copying mechanism for the genetic material" (Watson and Crick 1953). In the years since this remarkable understatement, we have come to realize the enormous complexity of the cellular machinery devoted to replicating DNA with the accuracy needed to maintain genetic information over many generations, balanced by the emergence of mutations on which selection can act. This complexity is partly based on the need to remove or tolerate cytotoxic and mutagenic lesions in DNA generated by environmental stress. Considered here is the fidelity with which undamaged and damaged DNA is replicated by the many DNA polymerases now known to exist. Some of these seriously violate Watson-Crick base-pairing rules such that, depending on the polymerase, the composition and location of the error, and the ability to correct errors (or not), DNA synthesis error rates can vary by more than a millionfold. This offers the potential to modulate rates of point mutations over a wide range, with consequences that can be either deleterious or beneficial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19903750      PMCID: PMC3628614          DOI: 10.1101/sqb.2009.74.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol        ISSN: 0091-7451


  61 in total

Review 1.  Translesion DNA synthesis in eukaryotes: a one- or two-polymerase affair.

Authors:  Satya Prakash; Louise Prakash
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Kinetic amplification of enzyme discrimination.

Authors:  J Ninio
Journal:  Biochimie       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 4.079

3.  Structural basis for the dual coding potential of 8-oxoguanosine by a high-fidelity DNA polymerase.

Authors:  Luis G Brieba; Brandt F Eichman; Robert J Kokoska; Sylvie Doublié; Tom A Kunkel; Tom Ellenberger
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2004-08-05       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  A constant rate of spontaneous mutation in DNA-based microbes.

Authors:  J W Drake
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Enthalpy-entropy compensation in DNA melting thermodynamics.

Authors:  J Petruska; M F Goodman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1995-01-13       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  The 3'-->5' exonucleases of both DNA polymerases delta and epsilon participate in correcting errors of DNA replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  A Morrison; A Sugino
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1994-02

7.  Structure of large fragment of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I complexed with dTMP.

Authors:  D L Ollis; P Brick; R Hamlin; N G Xuong; T A Steitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1985 Feb 28-Mar 6       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Kinetic basis of spontaneous mutation. Misinsertion frequencies, proofreading specificities and cost of proofreading by DNA polymerases of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  A R Fersht; J W Knill-Jones; W C Tsui
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1982-03-25       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 9.  Fidelity of DNA synthesis.

Authors:  L A Loeb; T A Kunkel
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 23.643

10.  Rates of spontaneous mutation in bacteriophage T4 are independent of host fidelity determinants.

Authors:  M E Santos; J W Drake
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  85 in total

Review 1.  DNA replication fidelity in Escherichia coli: a multi-DNA polymerase affair.

Authors:  Iwona J Fijalkowska; Roel M Schaaper; Piotr Jonczyk
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 16.408

Review 2.  The role of DNA exonucleases in protecting genome stability and their impact on ageing.

Authors:  Penelope A Mason; Lynne S Cox
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2011-09-23

Review 3.  RNase H2-RED carpets the path to eukaryotic RNase H2 functions.

Authors:  Susana M Cerritelli; Robert J Crouch
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2019-10-23

4.  Known mutator alleles do not markedly increase mutation rate in clinical Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains.

Authors:  Daniel A Skelly; Paul M Magwene; Brianna Meeks; Helen A Murphy
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Emerging critical roles of Fe-S clusters in DNA replication and repair.

Authors:  Jill O Fuss; Chi-Lin Tsai; Justin P Ishida; John A Tainer
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2015-02-02

Review 6.  Mechanisms of DNA damage, repair, and mutagenesis.

Authors:  Nimrat Chatterjee; Graham C Walker
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 3.216

7.  Mutation, Eugenics, and the Boundaries of Science.

Authors:  Michael Lynch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 8.  Practicing pathology in the era of big data and personalized medicine.

Authors:  Jiang Gu; Clive R Taylor
Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol       Date:  2014-01

Review 9.  Cancer genome landscapes.

Authors:  Bert Vogelstein; Nickolas Papadopoulos; Victor E Velculescu; Shibin Zhou; Luis A Diaz; Kenneth W Kinzler
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Y-family polymerase conformation is a major determinant of fidelity and translesion specificity.

Authors:  Ryan C Wilson; Meghan A Jackson; Janice D Pata
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 5.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.