Literature DB >> 12350484

Evolution of the presentation and pathologic and biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer diagnosed during the PSA era.

Jean O Ung1, Jerome P Richie, Ming-Hui Chen, Andrew A Renshaw, Anthony V D'Amico.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate the evolution of the clinical presentation and pathologic and biochemical outcomes for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy during the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) era.
METHODS: One thousand fifty-nine consecutive men treated with radical prostatectomy from January 1989 to December 2000 comprised the study cohort. A chi-squared metric was used to compare the proportions of patients during three intervals (1989 to 1992, 1993 to 1996, and 1997 to 2000) by categories of PSA level, biopsy Gleason score, clinical T stage, percent positive biopsy cores, age, and risk group, as well as pathologic T stage, Gleason score, margin status, and lymph node status. Actual 2-year PSA recurrence-free survival rates are reported for patients with a minimal follow-up of 24 months, stratified by the interval and preoperative risk group.
RESULTS: There was a significant shift in the preoperative characteristics toward younger patients (P <0.0001) with nonpalpable disease (P <0.0001), lower PSA levels (P <0.0001), fewer percent positive biopsies (P <0.0001), and lower preoperative risk group classification (P <0.0001). Pathologically, a significant downward stage migration was found toward organ-confined disease (P <0.0001) and improvement in surgical margin status (P <0.001). The actual 2-year PSA recurrence-free survival rates improved during the three intervals spanning the PSA era from 60% to 78% and 82% (P <0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: With the introduction of serum PSA as a screening tool, we have noted an evolution toward a lower pathologic stage, grade, and improved PSA outcome. These findings provide further support that serum PSA screening increases the proportion of patients potentially curable after radical prostatectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12350484     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01814-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  19 in total

1.  Prostate Cancer Knowledge, Prevention, and Screening Behaviors in Jamaican Men.

Authors:  Belinda F Morrison; William D Aiken; Richard Mayhew; Yulit Gordon; Folakemi T Odedina
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Racial differences in PSA screening interval and stage at diagnosis.

Authors:  William R Carpenter; Daniel L Howard; Yhenneko J Taylor; Louie E Ross; Sara E Wobker; Paul A Godley
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 3.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: review and assessment of an emerging technique.

Authors:  J B Basillote; T E Ahlering; D W Skarecky; D I Lee; R V Clayman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  In vivo imaging of intraprostatic-specific gene transcription by PET.

Authors:  Frédéric Pouliot; Breanne D W Karanikolas; Mai Johnson; Makoto Sato; Saul J Priceman; David Stout; Joanne Sohn; Nagichettiar Satyamurthy; Jean B deKernion; Lily Wu
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Evolution of the clinical presentation of men undergoing radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Phillip M Pierorazio; Ashley E Ross; Misop Han; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin; Edward M Schaeffer
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  The Role of Magnetic Resonance Image Guided Prostate Biopsy in Stratifying Men for Risk of Extracapsular Extension at Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Dima Raskolnikov; Arvin K George; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Baris Turkbey; M Minhaj Siddiqui; Nabeel A Shakir; Chinonyerem Okoro; Jason T Rothwax; Annerleim Walton-Diaz; Sandeep Sankineni; Daniel Su; Lambros Stamatakis; Maria J Merino; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  Saturation biopsies for prostate cancer: current uses and future prospects.

Authors:  Nicolas B Delongchamps; Gabriel P Haas
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 14.432

8.  Impact of body mass index on biochemical recurrence rates after radical prostatectomy: an analysis utilizing propensity score matching.

Authors:  Ahmed Magheli; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Bruce J Trock; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Alan W Partin; Misop Han; Mark L Gonzalgo
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  An analysis of a multiple biomarker panel to better predict prostate cancer metastasis after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Alison Y Zhang; Karen Chiam; Ygal Haupt; Stephen Fox; Simone Birch; Wayne Tilley; Lisa M Butler; Karen Knudsen; Clay Comstock; Krishan Rasiah; Judith Grogan; Kate L Mahon; Tina Bianco-Miotto; Carmela Ricciardelli; Maret Böhm; Susan Henshall; Warick Delprado; Phillip Stricker; Lisa G Horvath; James G Kench
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Prostate specific antigen versus prostate specific antigen density as a prognosticator of pathological characteristics and biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ahmed Magheli; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Bruce J Trock; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Alan W Partin; Misop Han; Mark L Gonzalgo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.