Literature DB >> 19901308

Cost to primary care practices of responding to payer requests for quality and performance data.

Jacqueline R Halladay1, Sally C Stearns, Thomas Wroth, Lynn Spragens, Sara Hofstetter, Sheryl Zimmerman, Philip D Sloane.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We wanted to determine how much it costs primary care practices to participate in programs that require them to gather and report data on care quality indicators.
METHODS: Using mixed quantitative-qualitative methods, we gathered data from 8 practices in North Carolina that were selected purposively to be diverse by size, ownership, type, location, and medical records. Formal practice visits occurred between January 2008 and May 2008. Four quality-reporting programs were studied: Medicare's Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI), Community Care of North Carolina (CCNC), Bridges to Excellence (BTE), and Improving Performance in Practice (IPIP). We estimated direct costs to the practice and on-site costs to the quality organization for implementation and maintenance phases of program participation.
RESULTS: Major expenses included personnel time for planning, training, registry maintenance, visit coding, data gathering and entry, and modification of electronic systems. Costs per full-time equivalent clinician ranged from less than $1,000 to $11,100 during program implementation phases and ranged from less than $100 to $4,300 annually during maintenance phases. Main sources of variation included program characteristics, amount of on-site assistance provided, experience and expertise of practice personnel, and the extent of data system problems encountered.
CONCLUSIONS: The costs of a quality-reporting program vary greatly by program and are important to anticipate and understand when undertaking quality improvement work. Incentives that would likely improve practice participation include financial payment, quality improvement skills training, and technical assistance with electronic system troubleshooting.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19901308      PMCID: PMC2775611          DOI: 10.1370/afm.1050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Fam Med        ISSN: 1544-1709            Impact factor:   5.166


  14 in total

1.  Improving quality through public disclosure of performance information.

Authors:  David Lansky
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Paying for quality: providers' incentives for quality improvement.

Authors:  Meredith B Rosenthal; Rushika Fernandopulle; HyunSook Ryu Song; Bruce Landon
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 3.  Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care.

Authors:  Basit Chaudhry; Jerome Wang; Shinyi Wu; Margaret Maglione; Walter Mojica; Elizabeth Roth; Sally C Morton; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Comparison of quality of care for patients in the Veterans Health Administration and patients in a national sample.

Authors:  Steven M Asch; Elizabeth A McGlynn; Mary M Hogan; Rodney A Hayward; Paul Shekelle; Lisa Rubenstein; Joan Keesey; John Adams; Eve A Kerr
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-12-21       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Electronic health record use and the quality of ambulatory care in the United States.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Linder; Jun Ma; David W Bates; Blackford Middleton; Randall S Stafford
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-07-09

6.  Physician attitudes toward pay-for-quality programs: perspectives from the front line.

Authors:  Gary J Young; Mark Meterko; Bert White; Barbara G Bokhour; Karen M Sautter; Dan Berlowitz; James F Burgess
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.929

7.  Performance measurement: problems and solutions.

Authors:  D M Eddy
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Report on financing the new model of family medicine.

Authors:  Stephen J Spann
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 5.166

9.  A comparison of time-and-motion and self-reporting methods of work measurement.

Authors:  T A Burke; J R McKee; H C Wilson; R M Donahue; A S Batenhorst; D S Pathak
Journal:  J Nurs Adm       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.737

10.  Start-up and incremental practice expenses for behavior change interventions in primary care.

Authors:  Martey S Dodoo; Alex H Krist; Maribel Cifuentes; Larry A Green
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.043

View more
  7 in total

1.  Practice transformation? Opportunities and costs for primary care practices.

Authors:  James M Gill; Bruce Bagley
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  Measuring Outcomes: Lessons From the World of Public Education.

Authors:  Andrew Saultz; John W Saultz
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Public reporting helped drive quality improvement in outpatient diabetes care among Wisconsin physician groups.

Authors:  Maureen A Smith; Alexandra Wright; Christopher Queram; Geoffrey C Lamb
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Cost of Transformation among Primary Care Practices Participating in a Medical Home Pilot.

Authors:  Grant R Martsolf; Ryan Kandrack; Robert A Gabbay; Mark W Friedberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  The unintended consequence of diabetes mellitus pay-for-performance (P4P) program in Taiwan: are patients with more comorbidities or more severe conditions likely to be excluded from the P4P program?

Authors:  Tsung-Tai Chen; Kuo-Piao Chung; I-Chin Lin; Mei-Shu Lai
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Combining QOF data with the care bundle approach may provide a more meaningful measure of quality in general practice.

Authors:  Carl de Wet; John McKay; Paul Bowie
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Organizational Costs and Benefits of a Health System Quality Improvement Intervention to Increase Aspirin Use for Primary Prevention of Heart Attack and Stroke.

Authors:  Jean Marie Abraham; Niki Oldenburg; Milton Eder; Russell Luepker
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2021 Sep-Oct 01       Impact factor: 1.200

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.