Literature DB >> 19898854

Effect of limb rotation on radiographic alignment in total knee arthroplasties.

Kerstin Radtke1, Christoph Becher, Yvonne Noll, Sven Ostermeier.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Even in a well-aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA), limb rotation at the time of radiographic assessment will alter the measurement of alignment. This could influence the radiographic outcome of TKA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of limb rotation on radiographic alignment after TKA and to establish a re-calculation of this rotation by using existing radiographic landmarks.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Synthetic femur and tibia (Sawbones), Inc. Vashon Island, WA) were used to create a TKA of the Triathlon knee prosthesis system (Stryker), Limerick, Ireland). The femoral alignment was 6.5 degrees valgus. The model was fixed in an upright stand. Five series of nine anteroposterior (AP) long leg radiographs were taken on a 30 cm x 120 cm plates in full extension with the limb rotated, in 5 degrees increments, from 20 degrees external rotation to 20 degrees internal rotation. After digitizing each radiograph (Scanner Hewlett Packard XJ 527), an observer measured the anatomic mechanical angle of the femur [AMA ( degrees )], the mechanical lateral proximal femur angle [mLPFA ( degrees )], the mechanical lateral distal femur angle [mLDFA ( degrees )], the mechanical medial proximal tibia angle [mMPTA ( degrees )] and the mechanical lateral distal tibia angle [mLDTA ( degrees )] using a digital measurement software (MediCAD, Hectec, Altfraunhofen, Germany). Besides, the observer measured the geometrical distances of the femoral component figured on the long leg radiograph. A ratio of one distance to another was measured (called femoral component distance ratio).
RESULTS: The average radiographic anatomic alignment ranged from 6.827 degrees AMA (SD = 0.22 degrees ) in 20 degrees internal rotation to 4.627 degrees AMA (SD = 0.22 degrees ) in 20 degrees external rotation. Average mLPFA ( degrees ) ranged from 101.63 degrees (SD = 0.63) in 20 degrees internal rotation to 93.60 degrees (SD = 0.74 degrees ) in 20 degrees external rotation. Average mLDFA ( degrees ) ranged from 90.59 degrees (SD = 3.01 degrees ) in 20 degrees internal rotation to 86.76 degrees (SD = 0.36 degrees ) in 20 degrees external rotation. Average mMPTA ( degrees ) ranged from 90.35 degrees (SD = 0.81 degrees ) in 20 degrees internal rotation to 88.49 degrees (SD = 0.52 degrees ) in 20 degrees external rotation. Average mLDTA ( degrees ) ranged from 98.89 degrees (SD = 2.3 degrees ) in 20 degrees internal rotation to 90.53 degrees (SD = 3.39 degrees ) in 20 degrees external rotation. Without an application of limb rotation, the femoral component distance ratio was measured to be 0.89 (SD = 0.01), in 20 degrees internal rotation 0.63 (SD = 0.01) and in 20 degrees external rotation 1.16 (SD = 0.01). DISCUSSION: Limb rotation had a highly statistically significant effect on measured anatomic alignment and mechanical angles. A correlation between limb rotation, anatomic mechanical angle, mechanical angles measured at femur and tibia and the femoral component distance ratio was established. As the anatomic mechanical angle and the femoral component distance ratio change linearly in the range of 20 degrees internal and external limb rotation, a calculation of the femoral component distance ratio could be used to re-calculate the limb rotation at the time of radiographic assessment to evaluate the evidence of a long leg radiograph.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19898854     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-009-0999-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  42 in total

1.  Intraoperative assessment of resected condyle thickness in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dae Kyung Bae; Sang Jun Song; Kyoung Ho Yoon; Jung Ho Noh; Chul Hee Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Comparison of the tibiofemoral rotational alignment after mobile and fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dongwook Kim; Sang Cheol Seong; Myung Chul Lee; Sahnghoon Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Computer-assisted navigation for the intraoperative assessment of lower limb alignment in high tibial osteotomy can avoid outliers compared with the conventional technique.

Authors:  Kilian Reising; Peter C Strohm; Oliver Hauschild; Hagen Schmal; Mohmed Khattab; Norbert P Südkamp; Philipp Niemeyer
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Assessment of two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) lower limb measurements in adults: Comparison of micro-dose and low-dose biplanar radiographs.

Authors:  Andrea B Rosskopf; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Florian M Buck
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Presence of rotational errors in long leg radiographs after total knee arthroplasty and impact on measured lower limb and component alignment.

Authors:  Günther Maderbacher; Clemens Baier; Achim Benditz; Ferdinand Wagner; Felix Greimel; Joachim Grifka; Armin Keshmiri
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Three dimensional patient-specific printed cutting guides for closing-wedge distal femoral osteotomy.

Authors:  JianHui Shi; Wei Lv; Yan Wang; Ben Ma; Wei Cui; ZhenZhong Liu; KeCheng Han
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Predicting knee rotation by the projection overlap of the proximal fibula and tibia in long-leg radiographs.

Authors:  Günther Maderbacher; Jens Schaumburger; Clemens Baier; Florian Zeman; Hans-Robert Springorum; Christian Dornia; Joachim Grifka; Armin Keshmiri
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Three-dimensional reconstruction method for measuring the knee valgus angle of the femur in northern Chinese adults.

Authors:  Tong Liu; Chen-yu Wang; Jian-lin Xiao; Lan-yu Zhu; Xue-zhou Li; Yan-guo Qin; Zhong-li Gao
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.066

9.  Pinless navigation in total knee arthroplasty: navigation reduced by the maximum?

Authors:  Günther Maderbacher; Jens Schaumburger; Armin Keshmiri; Magdalena Barthel; Hans-Robert Springorum; Benjamin Craiovan; Joachim Grifka; Clemens Baier
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  What is the optimal valgus pre-set for intramedullary femoral alignment rods in total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  G Maderbacher; A Keshmiri; J Schaumburger; F Zeman; A M Birkenbach; B Craiovan; J Grifka; C Baier
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.