Literature DB >> 19896669

Geometry, time-dependent and failure properties of human meniscal attachments.

Karen N Hauch1, Diego F Villegas, Tammy L Haut Donahue.   

Abstract

Meniscectomies have been shown to lead to osteoarthritis and the success of meniscal replacements remains questionable. It has been suggested that the success of a meniscal replacement is dependent on several factors, one of which is the secure fixation and firm attachment of the replacement to the tibial plateau at the horn locations. To aid in the development of meniscal replacements, the objectives of the current study were to determine the time-dependent and failure properties of human meniscal attachments. In contrast to the time-dependent tests, during uniaxial failure testing a charge-coupled video camera was used to document the local strain and linear modulus distribution across the surface of the attachments. The lateral attachments were statistically smaller in cross-sectional area and longer than the medial attachments. The anterior attachments were statistically longer and had a smaller cross-sectional area than the posterior attachments. From the stress relaxation tests, the load and stress relaxation rates of the medial anterior attachment were statistically greater than the medial posterior attachment. There were no significant differences in the creep, structural properties or the ultimate stress between the different attachments. Ultimate strain varied between attachments, as well as along the length of the attachment. Ultimate strain in the meniscus region (10.4+/-6.9%) and mid-substance region (12.7+/-16.4%) was smaller than the bony insertion region (32.2+/-21.5%). The lateral and anterior attachments were also found to have statistically greater strain than the medial and posterior attachments, respectively. The linear modulus was statistically weaker in the bony insertion region (69.7+/-33.7MPa) compared to the meniscus region (153+/-123MPa) and mid-substance region (195+/-121MPa). Overall the anterior attachments (169+/-130MPa) were also found to be statistically stronger than the posterior attachments (90.8+/-64.9MPa). These results can be used to help design tissue-engineered replacement menisci and their insertions and show the differences in material properties between attachments, as well as within an attachment. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19896669      PMCID: PMC2813343          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.09.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  45 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanical factors in tissue engineered meniscal repair.

Authors:  L A Setton; F Guilak; E W Hsu; T P Vail
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Effects of freezing/thawing on the biomechanical properties of human tendons.

Authors:  P Clavert; J F Kempf; F Bonnomet; P Boutemy; L Marcelin; J L Kahn
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Strain in the human medial collateral ligament during valgus loading of the knee.

Authors:  J C Gardiner; J A Weiss; T D Rosenberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Meniscofemoral ligaments--structural and material properties.

Authors:  Chinmay M Gupte; Andrew Smith; Nils Jamieson; Anthony M J Bull; Rhidian DeW Thomas; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 5.  Allograft meniscal transplantation: background, techniques, and results.

Authors:  Brian J Cole; Thomas R Carter; Scott A Rodeo
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2003

6.  MR diagnosis of posterior root tears of the lateral meniscus using arthroscopy as the reference standard.

Authors:  Arthur A De Smet; Donna G Blankenbaker; Richard Kijowski; Ben K Graf; Kazuhiko Shinki
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  How the stiffness of meniscal attachments and meniscal material properties affect tibio-femoral contact pressure computed using a validated finite element model of the human knee joint.

Authors:  Tammy L Haut Donahue; M L Hull; Mark M Rashid; Christopher R Jacobs
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Severity of medial meniscus damage in the canine knee after anterior cruciate ligament transection.

Authors:  G N Smith; E A Mickler; M E Albrecht; S L Myers; K D Brandt
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.576

9.  Comparison of viscoelastic, structural, and material properties of double-looped anterior cruciate ligament grafts made from bovine digital extensor and human hamstring tendons.

Authors:  T L Donahue; C Gregersen; M L Hull; S M Howell
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.097

10.  Nonlinear viscoelasticity in rabbit medial collateral ligament.

Authors:  Rittu V Hingorani; Paolo P Provenzano; Roderic S Lakes; Anthony Escarcega; Ray Vanderby
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.934

View more
  20 in total

1.  [Anterior meniscotibial ligaments. Forces under various load conditions].

Authors:  A M Seitz; R Kasisari; A Lubomierski; A Ignatius; L Dürselen
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Forces acting on the anterior meniscotibial ligaments.

Authors:  Andreas Seitz; Riza Kasisari; Lutz Claes; Anita Ignatius; Lutz Dürselen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Loading of the medial meniscus in the ACL deficient knee: A multibody computational study.

Authors:  Trent M Guess; Swithin Razu
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 2.242

4.  Dynamically tensioned ACL functional knee braces reduce ACL and meniscal strain.

Authors:  Sebastian Tomescu; Ryan Bakker; David Wasserstein; Mayank Kalra; Micah Nicholls; Cari Whyne; Naveen Chandrashekar
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Predicted loading on the menisci during gait: The effect of horn laxity.

Authors:  Trent M Guess; Swithin Razu; Hamidreza Jahandar; Antonis Stylianou
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Influence of partial meniscectomy on attachment forces, superficial strain and contact mechanics in porcine knee joints.

Authors:  Maren Freutel; Andreas M Seitz; Anita Ignatius; Lutz Dürselen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Hyperelastic properties of human meniscal attachments.

Authors:  Adam C Abraham; John T Moyer; Diego F Villegas; Gregory M Odegard; Tammy L Haut Donahue
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  From meniscus to bone: a quantitative evaluation of structure and function of the human meniscal attachments.

Authors:  Adam C Abraham; Tammy L Haut Donahue
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 8.947

9.  A statistically-augmented computational platform for evaluating meniscal function.

Authors:  Hongqiang Guo; Thomas J Santner; Tony Chen; Hongsheng Wang; Caroline Brial; Susannah L Gilbert; Matthew F Koff; Amy L Lerner; Suzanne A Maher
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Internal pressure of human meniscal root attachments during loading.

Authors:  Adam C Abraham; Diego F Villegas; Kenton R Kaufman; Tammy L Haut Donahue
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 3.494

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.