Literature DB >> 19895875

Arm movement maps evoked by cortical magnetic stimulation in a robotic environment.

L M Jones-Lush1, T N Judkins, G F Wittenberg.   

Abstract

Many neurological diseases result in a severe inability to reach for which there is no proven therapy. Promising new interventions to address reaching rehabilitation using robotic training devices are currently under investigation in clinical trials but the neural mechanisms that underlie these interventions are not understood. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) may be used to probe such mechanisms quickly and non-invasively, by mapping muscle and movement representations in the primary motor cortex (M1). Here we investigate movement maps in healthy young subjects at rest using TMS in the robotic environment, with the goal of determining the range of TMS accessible movements, as a starting point for the study of cortical plasticity in combination with robotic therapy. We systematically stimulated the left motor cortex of 14 normal volunteers while the right hand and forearm rested in the cradle of a two degree-of-freedom planar rehabilitation robot (IMT). Maps were created by applying 10 stimuli at each of nine locations (3x3 cm(2) grid) centered on the M1 movement hotspot for each subject, defined as the stimulation location that elicited robot cradle movements of the greatest distance. TMS-evoked movement kinematics were measured by the robotic encoders and ranged in magnitude from 0 to 3 cm. Movement maps varied by subject and by location within a subject. However, movements were very consistent within a single stimulation location for a given subject. Movement vectors remained relatively constant (limited to <90 degrees section of the planar field) within some subjects across the entire map, while others covered a wider range of directions. This may be due to individual differences in cortical physiology or anatomy, resulting in a practical limit to the areas that are TMS-accessible. This study provides a baseline inventory of possible TMS-evoked arm movements in the robotic reaching trainer, and thus may provide a real-time, non-invasive platform for neurophysiology based evaluation and therapy in motor rehabilitation settings. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19895875      PMCID: PMC2818445          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.10.065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  27 in total

Review 1.  Constraints on somatotopic organization in the primary motor cortex.

Authors:  M H Schieber
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  The cortical control of movement revisited.

Authors:  Michael S A Graziano; Charlotte S R Taylor; Tirin Moore; Dylan F Cooke
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-10-24       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Finger somatotopy in human motor cortex.

Authors:  R Beisteiner; C Windischberger; R Lanzenberger; V Edward; R Cunnington; M Erdler; A Gartus; B Streibl; E Moser; L Deecke
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  The motor cortex and the coding of force.

Authors:  A P Georgopoulos; J Ashe; N Smyrnis; M Taira
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-06-19       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke.

Authors:  M L Aisen; H I Krebs; N Hogan; F McDowell; B T Volpe
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1997-04

6.  Topographic mapping of trans-cranial magnetic stimulation data on surface rendered MR images of the brain.

Authors:  K D Singh; S Hamdy; Q Aziz; D G Thompson
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-10

7.  Overview of clinical trials with MIT-MANUS: a robot-aided neuro-rehabilitation facility.

Authors:  H I Krebs; N Hogan; B T Volpe; M L Aisen; L Edelstein; C Diels
Journal:  Technol Health Care       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.285

8.  Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke.

Authors:  Peter S Lum; Charles G Burgar; Peggy C Shor; Matra Majmundar; Machiel Van der Loos
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Topographic maps of human motor cortex in normal and pathological conditions: mirror movements, amputations and spinal cord injuries.

Authors:  L G Cohen; S Bandinelli; H R Topka; P Fuhr; B J Roth; M Hallett
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl       Date:  1991

10.  Mechanisms of use-dependent plasticity in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  C M Bütefisch; B C Davis; S P Wise; L Sawaki; L Kopylev; J Classen; L G Cohen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  4 in total

1.  Variability of motor cortical excitability using a novel mapping procedure.

Authors:  Andrew E Littmann; Colleen L McHenry; Richard K Shields
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Timing of motor cortical stimulation during planar robotic training differentially impacts neuroplasticity in older adults.

Authors:  Crystal L Massie; Shailesh S Kantak; Priya Narayanan; George F Wittenberg
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Rapid plasticity of motor corticospinal system with robotic reach training.

Authors:  S S Kantak; L M Jones-Lush; P Narayanan; T N Judkins; G F Wittenberg
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-05-11       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Modulation of corticospinal output in agonist and antagonist proximal arm muscles during motor preparation.

Authors:  Cécilia Neige; Hugo Massé-Alarie; Martin Gagné; Laurent J Bouyer; Catherine Mercier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.